• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Karakteristik Penderita Infark Miokard Akut Rawat Inap Di Rsu Dr. Pirngadi Medan Tahun 2010-2011

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Membagikan "Karakteristik Penderita Infark Miokard Akut Rawat Inap Di Rsu Dr. Pirngadi Medan Tahun 2010-2011"

Copied!
25
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Lampiran 1.

Analisis Kecendrungan dengan Persamaan Regresi Linear

Memakai rumus : Y = a + bx

Jumlah Penderita Infark Miokard Akut di RSU Dr. Pirngadi Medan

Berdasarkan Data Tahun 2007-2011

Tahun

Tahun dalam

kode (X)

Y

XY

X

2

2007

1

51

51

1

2008

2

47

94

4

2009

3

54

162

9

2010

4

49

196

16

2011

5

61

305

25

∑Xi=15

∑Yi=262

∑XiYi=811

∑Xi

2

=55

n=5

(

∑Xi

) (

∑Yi

) – (

∑Xi

) (

∑XiYi)

n

∑XiYi

– (

∑Xi

) (

∑Yi

)

a =

b =

n

∑Xi

2

– (

∑Xi

)

2

n

∑Xi

2

– (

∑Xi

)

2

(262) (55) – (15) (811)

5 (811) – (15) (262)

a =

b =

5 (55) – (15)

2

5 (55) – (15)

2245

125

a =

b =

50

50

a= 44,9

b = 2,5

(2)

jika X=1 maka Y = 2,5 (1) + 44,9 = 47,4

jika X=2 maka Y = 2,5 (2) + 44,9 = 49,9

jika X=3 maka Y = 2,5 (3) + 44,9 = 52,4

jika X=4 maka Y = 2,5 (4) + 44,9 = 54,9

jika X=5 maka Y = 2,5 (5) + 44,9 = 57,4

(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

102

brmaulin

sng 63 6 2 1 1 2 4 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 3 2

103 marlan 47 3 2 1 2 1 4 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 4 2

104 m. ansyor 48 3 2 1 3 1 3 4 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1

105 adiarto 37 1 1 1 2 1 4 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 8 2

106 Ngolu

smboln 52 4 2 1 1 2 4 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 7 2

107 murni 63 6 2 2 2 1 4 5 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 5 2

108 Satria

sbring 53 4 2 1 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 3

109 syamsul 65 7 2 1 3 1 4 4 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 3

(7)

Lampiran 3. Hasil Pengolahan Data

1.

Analisis Deskriptif

Karakteristik Penderita Infark Miokard Akut

Umur penderita

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid 35-40 7 6.4 6.4 6.4

41-46 10 9.1 9.1 15.5

47-52 17 15.5 15.5 30.9

53-58 23 20.9 20.9 51.8

59-64 18 16.4 16.4 68.2

65-70 19 17.3 17.3 85.5

71-76 11 10.0 10.0 95.5

77-82 5 4.5 4.5 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

jenis kelamin

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Laki-laki 70 63.6 63.6 63.6

Perempuan 40 36.4 36.4 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

suku penderita

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Batak 59 53.6 53.6 53.6

Jawa 34 30.9 30.9 84.5

Melayu 6 5.5 5.5 90.0

Minang 7 6.4 6.4 96.4

Aceh 1 .9 .9 97.3

Lainnya 3 2.7 2.7 100.0

(8)

agama penderita

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Islam 76 69.1 69.1 69.1

Kristen Protestan 22 20.0 20.0 89.1

Kristen Katolik 11 10.0 10.0 99.1

Hindu 1 .9 .9 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

pendidikan terakhir

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak Tamat SD 1 .9 .9 .9

SD 13 11.8 11.8 12.7

SLTP 17 15.5 15.5 28.2

SLTA 73 66.4 66.4 94.5

Akademi / PT 6 5.5 5.5 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

pekerjaan penderita

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Wiraswasta 37 33.6 33.6 33.6

PNS/TNI/POLRI 30 27.3 27.3 60.9

Petani 2 1.8 1.8 62.7

Karyawan Swasta 6 5.5 5.5 68.2

IRT 30 27.3 27.3 95.5

Lainnya 5 4.5 4.5 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

asal penderita

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Dalam Kota Medan 82 74.5 74.5 74.5

Luar Kota Medan 28 25.5 25.5 100.0

(9)

nyeri dada penderita

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ya 103 93.6 93.6 93.6

Tidak 7 6.4 6.4 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

sesak nafas

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ya 66 60.0 60.0 60.0

Tidak 44 40.0 40.0 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

keringat dingin

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ya 22 20.0 20.0 20.0

Tidak 88 80.0 80.0 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

badan lemas

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ya 22 20.0 20.0 20.0

Tidak 88 80.0 80.0 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

status faktor risiko

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Tercatat 104 94.5 94.5 94.5

Tidak Tercatat 6 5.5 5.5 100.0

(10)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ya 16 14.5 15.4 15.4

Tidak 88 80.0 84.6 100.0

Total 104 94.5 100.0

Missing System 6 5.5

Total 110 100.0

hipertensi

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ya 87 79.1 83.7 83.7

Tidak 17 15.5 16.3 100.0

Total 104 94.5 100.0

Missing System 6 5.5

Total 110 100.0

diabetes mellitus

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ya 39 35.5 37.5 37.5

Tidak 65 59.1 62.5 100.0

Total 104 94.5 100.0

Missing System 6 5.5

Total 110 100.0

(11)

hiperkolesterolemia

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ya 12 10.9 11.5 11.5

Tidak 92 83.6 88.5 100.0

Total 104 94.5 100.0

Missing System 6 5.5

Total 110 100.0

obesitas

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ya 1 .9 1.0 1.0

Tidak 103 93.6 99.0 100.0

Total 104 94.5 100.0

Missing System 6 5.5

Total 110 100.0

kebiasan merokok

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ya 33 30.0 31.7 31.7

Tidak 71 64.5 68.3 100.0

Total 104 94.5 100.0

Missing System 6 5.5

(12)

status komplikasi

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ada 61 55.5 55.5 55.5

Tidak Ada 49 44.5 44.5 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

aritmia

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ya 56 50.9 91.8 91.8

Tidak 5 4.5 8.2 100.0

Total 61 55.5 100.0

Missing System 49 44.5

Total 110 100.0

syok kardiogenik

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ya 9 8.2 14.8 14.8

Tidak 52 47.3 85.2 100.0

Total 61 55.5 100.0

Missing System 49 44.5

Total 110 100.0

penatalaksanaan medis

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid obat-obatan 103 93.6 93.6 93.6

obat-obatan + pemasangan

kateter 7 6.4 6.4 100.0

(13)

sumber pembiayaan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid JPKM 37 33.6 33.6 33.6

ASKES 46 41.8 41.8 75.5

Biaya Sendiri 27 24.5 24.5 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

Statistics lama rawatan rata-rata

N Valid 110

Missing 0

Mean 5.45

Median 5.00

Std. Deviation 4.001

Variance 16.011

Minimum 1

Maximum 20

keadaan sewaktu pulang

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Pulang Berobat Jalan (PJB) 72 65.5 65.5 65.5

Pulang Atas Permintaan

Sendiri (PAPS) 7 6.4 6.4 71.8

Meninggal Dunia 31 28.2 28.2 100.0

Total 110 100.0 100.0

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

lama rawatan rata-rata 110 1 20 5.45 4.001

(14)

2.

ANALISA STATISTIK

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Umur penderita * jenis

kelamin 110 100.0% 0 .0% 110 100.0%

Umur penderita * jenis kelamin Crosstabulation

jenis kelamin

Total Laki-laki Perempuan

Umur penderita 35-39 Count 4 2 6

% within Umur penderita 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within jenis kelamin 5.7% 5.0% 5.5%

% of Total 3.6% 1.8% 5.5%

40-44 Count 6 2 8

% within Umur penderita 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

% within jenis kelamin 8.6% 5.0% 7.3%

% of Total 5.5% 1.8% 7.3%

45-49 Count 12 0 12

% within Umur penderita 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within jenis kelamin 17.1% .0% 10.9%

% of Total 10.9% .0% 10.9%

50-54 Count 8 4 12

% within Umur penderita 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within jenis kelamin 11.4% 10.0% 10.9%

% of Total 7.3% 3.6% 10.9%

55-59 Count 15 6 21

% within Umur penderita 71.4% 28.6% 100.0%

% within jenis kelamin 21.4% 15.0% 19.1%

% of Total 13.6% 5.5% 19.1%

60-64 Count 9 7 16

% within Umur penderita 56.2% 43.8% 100.0%

% within jenis kelamin 12.9% 17.5% 14.5%

% of Total 8.2% 6.4% 14.5%

65-69 Count 7 9 16

(15)

% within jenis kelamin 10.0% 22.5% 14.5%

% of Total 6.4% 8.2% 14.5%

70-74 Count 4 7 11

% within Umur penderita 36.4% 63.6% 100.0%

% within jenis kelamin 5.7% 17.5% 10.0%

% of Total 3.6% 6.4% 10.0%

75-79 Count 5 2 7

% within Umur penderita 71.4% 28.6% 100.0%

% within jenis kelamin 7.1% 5.0% 6.4%

% of Total 4.5% 1.8% 6.4%

80-84 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur penderita .0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within jenis kelamin .0% 2.5% .9%

% of Total .0% .9% .9%

Total Count 70 40 110

% within Umur penderita 63.6% 36.4% 100.0%

% within jenis kelamin 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(16)

Crosstabs umur berdasarkan status komplikasi

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

status komplikasi * Umur

penderita 110 100.0% 0 .0% 110 100.0%

status komplikasi * Umur penderita Crosstabulation

Umur penderita

Total < 45 > 45

status komplikasi Ada Count 0 61 61

% within status komplikasi .0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within Umur penderita .0% 59.2% 55.5%

% of Total .0% 55.5% 55.5%

Tidak Ada Count 7 42 49

% within status komplikasi 14.3% 85.7% 100.0%

% within Umur penderita 100.0% 40.8% 44.5%

% of Total 6.4% 38.2% 44.5%

Total Count 7 103 110

% within status komplikasi 6.4% 93.6% 100.0%

% within Umur penderita 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 6.4% 93.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 9.307a

1 .002

Continuity Correctionb 7.063 1 .008

Likelihood Ratio 11.917 1 .001

Fisher's Exact Test .003 .003

Linear-by-Linear Association 9.222 1 .002

N of Valid Casesb 110

(17)

Crosstabs penatalaksanaan medis berdasarkan status komplikasi

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

status komplikasi *

penatalaksanaan medis 110 100.0% 0 .0% 110 100.0%

status komplikasi * penatalaksanaan medis Crosstabulation

penatalaksanaan medis

Total obat-obatan

obat-obatan + pemasangan

kateter

status komplikasi Ada Count 54 7 61

Expected Count 57.1 3.9 61.0

% within status komplikasi 88.5% 11.5% 100.0%

% within penatalaksanaan

medis 52.4% 100.0% 55.5%

% of Total 49.1% 6.4% 55.5%

Tidak Ada Count 49 0 49

Expected Count 45.9 3.1 49.0

% within status komplikasi 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within penatalaksanaan

medis 47.6% .0% 44.5%

% of Total 44.5% .0% 44.5%

Total Count 103 7 110

Expected Count 103.0 7.0 110.0

% within status komplikasi 93.6% 6.4% 100.0%

% within penatalaksanaan

medis 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(18)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.005a 1 .014

Continuity Correctionb 4.234 1 .040

Likelihood Ratio 8.635 1 .003

Fisher's Exact Test .016 .014

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.951 1 .015

N of Valid Casesb 110

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,12.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

kolmogrov wirnov, lama rawatan rata-rata berdsarkan

penatalaksanaan medis

Descriptive Statistics

N Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum

lama rawatan rata-rata 110 5.45 4.001 1 20

penatalaksanaan medis 110 1.06 .245 1 2

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

lama rawatan rata-rata

penatalaksanaan medis

N 110 110

Normal Parametersa Mean 5.45 1.06

Std. Deviation 4.001 .245

Most Extreme Differences Absolute .154 .539

Positive .154 .539

Negative -.133 -.398

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.615 5.650

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .011 .000

(19)

T-Test lama rawatan rata-rata berdsarkan penatalaksanaan medis

Group Statistics

penatalaksanaan

medis N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

lama rawatan rata-rata

obat-obatan 103 5.47 4.019 .396

obat-obatan +

pemasangan kateter 7 5.14 4.018 1.519

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of

Variances t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Std. Error Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Lower Upper

lama rawatan rata-rata

Equal variances assumed

.013 .909 .206 108 .837 .323 1.570 -2.789 3.435

Equal variances not assumed

.206 6.842 .843 .323 1.569 -3.405 4.052

Crosstabs penatalaksanaan medis berdasarkan sumber

pembiayaan

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

sumber pembiayaan *

(20)

sumber pembiayaan * penatalaksanaan medis Crosstabulation

penatalaksanaan medis

Total obat-obatan

obat-obatan + pemasanga

n kateter

sumber pembiayaan

JPKM Count 34 3 37

Expected Count 34.6 2.4 37.0

% within sumber

pembiayaan 91.9% 8.1% 100.0%

% within penatalaksanaan

medis 33.0% 42.9% 33.6%

% of Total 30.9% 2.7% 33.6%

ASKES Count 43 3 46

Expected Count 43.1 2.9 46.0

% within sumber

pembiayaan 93.5% 6.5% 100.0%

% within penatalaksanaan

medis 41.7% 42.9% 41.8%

% of Total 39.1% 2.7% 41.8%

Biaya Sendiri

Count 26 1 27

Expected Count 25.3 1.7 27.0

% within sumber

pembiayaan 96.3% 3.7% 100.0%

% within penatalaksanaan

medis 25.2% 14.3% 24.5%

% of Total 23.6% .9% 24.5%

Total Count 103 7 110

Expected Count 103.0 7.0 110.0

% within sumber

pembiayaan 93.6% 6.4% 100.0%

% within penatalaksanaan

medis 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(21)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .511a 2 .774

Likelihood Ratio .551 2 .759

Linear-by-Linear Association .490 1 .484

N of Valid Cases 110

a. 3 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,72.

Oneway lama rawatan rata-rata berdsarkan sumber pembiayaan

Descriptives

N Mean

Std.

Deviation Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Minimum Maximum

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

JPKM 37 6.08 3.707 .609 4.85 7.32 1 18

ASKES 46 5.98 4.607 .679 4.61 7.35 1 20

Biaya Sendiri 27 3.67 2.646 .509 2.62 4.71 1 12

Total 110 5.45 4.001 .382 4.69 6.20 1 20

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

lama rawatan rata-rata

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

2.148 2 107 .122

ANOVA

lama rawatan rata-rata

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 113.438 2 56.719 3.719 .027

Within Groups 1631.735 107 15.250

(22)

Crosstabs status komplikasi berdsarkan keadaan sewaktu pulang

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

keadaan sewaktu pulang *

status komplikasi 110 100.0% 0 .0% 110 100.0%

keadaan sewaktu pulang * status komplikasi Crosstabulation

status komplikasi

Total

Ada Tidak Ada

keadaan sewaktu pulang

Pulang Berobat Jalan (PJB)

Count 32 40 72

Expected Count 39.9 32.1 72.0

% within keadaan sewaktu

pulang 44.4% 55.6% 100.0%

% within status komplikasi 52.5% 81.6% 65.5%

% of Total 29.1% 36.4% 65.5%

Pulang Atas Permintaan Sendiri (PAPS)

Count 3 4 7

Expected Count 3.9 3.1 7.0

% within keadaan sewaktu

pulang 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

% within status komplikasi 4.9% 8.2% 6.4%

% of Total 2.7% 3.6% 6.4%

Count 26 5 31

Expected Count 17.2 13.8 31.0

% within keadaan sewaktu

pulang 83.9% 16.1% 100.0%

% within status komplikasi 42.6% 10.2% 28.2%

% of Total 23.6% 4.5% 28.2%

Total Count 61 49 110

Expected Count 61.0 49.0 110.0

% within keadaan sewaktu

pulang 55.5% 44.5% 100.0%

% within status komplikasi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(23)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 14.116a 2 .001

Likelihood Ratio 15.306 2 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 12.809 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 110

a. 2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,12.

Crosstabs penatalaksanaan medis berdasarkan keadaan sewaktu

pulang

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

keadaan sewaktu pulang *

penatalaksanaan medis 110 100.0% 0 .0% 110 100.0%

keadaan sewaktu pulang * penatalaksanaan medis Crosstabulation

penatalaksanaan medis

Total obat-obatan

obat-obatan + pemasangan

kateter

keadaan sewaktu pulang

Pulang Berobat Jalan (PJB)

Count 70 2 72

Expected Count 67.4 4.6 72.0

% within keadaan

sewaktu pulang 97.2% 2.8% 100.0%

% within

penatalaksanaan medis 68.0% 28.6% 65.5%

% of Total 63.6% 1.8% 65.5%

Pulang Atas Permintaan Sendiri (PAPS)

Count 7 0 7

Expected Count 6.6 .4 7.0

% within keadaan

(24)

% within

penatalaksanaan medis 6.8% .0% 6.4%

% of Total 6.4% .0% 6.4%

Meninggal Dunia Count 26 5 31

Expected Count 29.0 2.0 31.0

% within keadaan

sewaktu pulang 83.9% 16.1% 100.0%

penatalaksanaan medis 25.2% 71.4% 28.2%

% of Total 23.6% 4.5% 28.2%

Total Count 103 7 110

Expected Count 103.0 7.0 110.0

% within keadaan

sewaktu pulang 93.6% 6.4% 100.0%

% within

penatalaksanaan medis 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 93.6% 6.4% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.991a 2 .030

Likelihood Ratio 6.439 2 .040

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.965 1 .015

N of Valid Cases 110

a. 3 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,45.

Oneway lama rawatan rata-rata berdsarkan keadaan sewaktu

pulang

Descriptives

N Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Minimum Maximum Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pulang Berobat

Jalan (PJB) 72 6.10 3.489 .411 5.28 6.92 1 18

Pulang Atas Permintaan Sendiri (PAPS)

7 4.71 3.861 1.459 1.14 8.28 1 13

Meninggal Dunia 31 4.10 4.833 .868 2.32 5.87 1 20

(25)

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

lama rawatan rata-rata

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

1.451 2 107 .239

ANOVA

lama rawatan rata-rata

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 90.715 2 45.358 2.933 .058

Within Groups 1654.458 107 15.462

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Hasil analisis antara faktor-faktor (biaya pestisida, biaya pupuk, biaya benih, upah tenaga kerja, produksi, harga gabah) yang mempengaruhi pendapatan petani padi sawah di Desa

Kitosan mempunyai sifat hidrofobik (menolak air), reaktif secara kimia, mempunyai kesanggupan membentuk membran film, bersifat anti mikroba, dapat dimakan, dan mempunyai sifat

Upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap hak keperdataan warga masyarakat di atas tanah yang berada dalam kawasan hutan berdasarkan SK 463/2013 yakni daerah yang berdasarkan SK

ANDI PRAMANA MATONDANG : Pengaruh Komposisi Kacang Mete dan Kacang Tanah, serta Lama Penyanggraian Terhadap Mutu Mentega Kacang Campuran (Mixed Peanut Butter).. HALIM SULAIMAN

Konsekuensinya adalah, kematian bahasa secara khusus terjadi dalam ketidakstabilan masyarakat tutur yang dwibahasawan atau multibahasawan sebagai akibat pergeseran bahasa karena

dan alternatif perbaikan yang dapat digunakan untuk memperbaiki kecacatan produksi.. Metode yang digunakan adalah dengan menggunakan

Untuk respons adaptasi konsep diri sebanyak (50,0%) responden merasa kurang percaya diri bila berhadapan dengan orang lain, hasil penelitian ini sesuai dengan pendapat Stuart

Penerapan good governance dalam pemerintahan desa akan berkaitan dengan hubungan antara kepala desa dengan kepala daerah, dalam kasus kepala desa dolok huluan, hubungan