166 DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Adair, John. (2007). Decision Making & Problem Solving Strategies. London: Kogan Page.
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (eds). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning Teaching and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of education Objectives. New York: Addisin Wesley.
Anderson, D. dan Nashon, S. (2006). “Predators of Knowledge Construction: Interpreting Students’ Metacognition in an Amusement Park Physics Program”. Wiley InterScience. Tersedia: http//www.interscience.wiley.co. Arends, R. L. (1997). Classroom Instruction and Management. New York:
McGraw-Hill Book Co.
. (2004). Learning to Teach. 5th Ed. Boston: McGraw Hill
. (2008a). Learning to Teach. Buku I. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
. (2008b). Learning to Teach. Buku II. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar. Baser, M. (2006). Effect of Conceptual Change Oriented Instruction on Students’
Understanding of Heat and Temperature Concepts. Journal Maltese Education Research. Vol:4 No.1 2006 64-79. Tersedia: www.educ.um.edu.mt/jmer.
Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research. 4st Edition. New York: Longman, Inc.
Campbell, J. (2007). “Using Metacogs to Collaborate with Students to Improve
Teaching and Learning in Physics”. Tersedia
http://www.ccfi.educ.ubc.ca/publication/insight/v11n02/articles/campbell. html
Cartwright, C. A. & Cartwright, G. P. (1984). Developing Observation Skills. 2nd Ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
167 Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test
Theory, New York: CBS College Publishing.
Dahar, R.W. (1996) Teori-teori belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Desoete, A., (2007). “Evaluating and improving the mathematics teaching-learning process through metacognitiaon”. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. 5, (13), 705-730.
Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., dan Buysse, A. (2001). “Metacognition and Mathematical Problem Solving in Grade 3”. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 34, (5), 435-449.
Dori, Y. I & Belcher, J. (2005). “How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts”. The journal of learning science. 14, (2). 243-279. Tersedia: http://web.mit.edu/.[26 September 2007].
Escalada, L., & Zollman, D. A., (1997). “An Investigation on the Effects of Using Interactive Digital Video in a Physics Classroom on Student Learning and Attitudes”. Journal of research in science teaching. 34, (5). 467–489.
Gaigher, E., Rogan J. M. and Braun, M. W. H. (2007). “Exploring the Development of Conceptual Understanding through Structured Problem-solving in Physics”. International Journal of Science Education. 29, (9), 1089–1110.
Garritz, A. (2010). Pedagogical Content Knowledge and the Affective domain of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Vol. 4, No. 2 (July 2010). ISSN 1931-4744. Tersedia: http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl.
Giancoli, D. C. (2001). Physics: Principles with Applications, Fifth Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International.
Gok, T. (2010). “The general Assessment of Problem Solving Processes and Metacognition in Physics Education”. Eurasian Journal Physics Chemical Education. 2,(2).110-122.
Grinnel, Jr., R. M. (1988). Social Work Research and Evaluation. Illionis: F.E. Peacock Pub. Inc.
Guilford, J. P. and Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental Statistic in Psychology and Education. Singapure: McGraw-Hill.
168 Corwin Press, INC. A Sage Publications Company Thousand Oaks, California.
Heller, K., & Heller, P. (1999). Problem-Solving Labs. Introductory Physics I Mechanics. Cooperative Group problem-solving in physics.
Henderson, C., & Kuo, V. (2001). Instructors’ Ideas about Problem Solving – Setting Goals. Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Rochester, NY.
Hestenes, D. & Wells, M. (1997). Mechanics Baseline Test.
Hollingworth, R. & McLoughlin. (2002). The Development of Metacognitive Skilss among Firts Year Science Student. Tersedia http://fyhe.Qut.Edu.au./FYHE-Previous/Papers/HollingworthPaper.doc.
Israel, S. E., Block, C. C., Bauserman, K. L., Kinnucan-Welsch (Ed). (2005). Metacognition in Literacy Learning. Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher. Mahwah, New Jersey. London.
Joice, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2008). Models of Teaching. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Jennifer L. (2006). Physics Problem Solving. University of Minnesota.
Kaplan & Saccuzzo. (2005). Psychological Testing. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Kipnis, M. dan Hofstein, A. (2007). “The Inquiry Laboratory as a Source for Development of Metacognitive Skills”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
Kuo, V. (2004). An explanatory model of physics faculty conception about the problem solving process. University of Minnesota: Ph. D. Thesis.
Kuhn, D. & Dean, D. Jr. (2004). Metacognitive: A Bridge between Cognitive Psycology and Educational Practice. Theory Into Practice. Volume 43. No. 4.
Lorenzo, M. (2005). The Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Problem Solving Heuristic. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3: 33–58.
169 Malone, L. K. (2006a). A comparative Study of the Cognitive and Metacognitive between Modeling and Non-Modeling High School Physics Students. Thesis.
Malone, L. K. (2006b). “The convergence of knowledge organization, problem-solving behavior, and metacognition research with the Modeling Method of physics instruction” – Part I. Journal Physics Teacher Education. Online, 4(1).
_____. (2007). “The convergence of knowledge organization, problem-solving behavior, and metacognition research with the Modeling Method of physics instruction” – Part II. Journal Physics Teacher Education.
www.phy.ilstu.edu/jpteo. 4, (2).
Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom Assessment & Grading that Work. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia USA. Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z.,
Rankin, S. C., Suhor (1998). Dimensions of Thinking: Framework for Curriculum and Instruction. CUSO: ASCD.
Matlin, M. E. (2009). Cognitive Psychology. Seventh Edition. International Student Version. Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc.
_______ (2003). Cognition. Fifth Edition. Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc.
McGregor, D. (2007). Developing Thinking Developing Learning : A Guide to Thinking Skills in Education Berkshire: Open University Press, Mc Graw-Hill.
Mehrens & Lehmann. (1984). Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. New York: New York: CBS College Publishing.
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). “The Relationshif between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gain in Physics: A Possible Hidden Variable in Diagnostic Pretest Score”. Am.J.Phys.70,(2),1259-1267.[Online]. Tersedia: w.physic.lastate.edu/per/does/addendum_on_normalizedgain. [10 Februari 2008].
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. [Online]. Tersedia:
http://books.nap.edu/html/inquiry_addendum/notice.html. [9 Oktober
2001].
170 Ornek, F., Robinson, W. R., & Haugan, M. P. (2008). What Makes Physics Difficult? International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 2008. 3(1).
Panaoura, A. & Philippou, G. (2004) The Measurement of Young Pupils’ Metacognitive Ability in Mathematics: The Case of Self-Representation and Self-Evaluation. In Journal CERME 4 [Online] Provided: http://Cerme4.crm.es/papers%20 definities /2/ panaoura.philippou.pdf
Panaoura, A. & Panaoura, G. (2006) Cognitive and Metacognitive Performance on Mathematics. [Online]. Provided : http:/self.uws.edu.au/conferences/ 2004 panaoura. philippou
Perfect, T. J. & Schwartz, B. L. (2002). Applied Metacognition. Cambridge University Press.
Phang, F. A. (2006). The Patterns of Physics Problem-Solving From the Perspective of Metacognition. Master dissertation, University of
Cambridge. Retrieved:
http://people.pwf.cam.ac.ok./kst/24/ResearchStudents/Abdullah2006meta-cognition.pdf
Pretz, J.E., Naples, A., & Sternberg, R.J. (2003). Recognizing, Defining, and Representing Problems dalam Davidson & Sternberg (Eds). The Psychology of Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Priyatno, D. (2009). Lima jam Belajar Olah Data dengan SPSS 17. Penerbit Andi Yogyakarta
Ruseffendi, H. E. T. (1998). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang Noneksakta Lainnya. Semarang: IKIP Semarang.
Rutherford, F. J. & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Saleh, S. (2011). The Level of B.Sc.Ed Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Newtonian Physics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences October 2011, Vol. 1, No. 3 ISSN: 2222-6990
171 Schraw, G. & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive Theories. Educational Psychology, Departement of Educational Psychology Papers and Publications.http://www.springerlink.com/content/1040-726X.
Selçuk, G. S., Çalı kan, S., dan Erol, M. (2008). “The Effects of Problem solving Instruction on Physics Achievement, Problem Solving Performance and Strategy Use”. Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ. 2, (3). 151-166. http://www.journal.lapen.org.mx
Slavin, R. E. (2000). Educational Psychology: Thoery and Practice. Sixth Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Publisher.
Slavin, R. E. (1994). Educational Psychology: Theories and Practies. Fourth Edition. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon Publisher.
Solaz-Portolés, J. J. & Sanjosé, V. (2007). Representation in Problem Solving in Science: Direction for Practice. Asia Pasific Forum Science Learning and Teaching. Volume 8, Issue 2, Article 4, p.1.
Solaz-Portolés, J.J. & Sanjosé, V. (2007). “Cognitive variables in science problem solving: A review of research”. Journal Physics Teacher Education. www.phy.ilstu.edu/jpteo. 4, (2).
Sugiyono, (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
______ , (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata, N.S. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2004). Pengembangan Kurikulum, Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Supranata, S. (2006) Analitis, Validitas, Reliabilitas, dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tan, O. S. (2004). Enhanching Thinking Problem Based Learning Approached. Singapura: Thomson.
172 Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S. & Semmel, M. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Source Book. Bloominton: Center for Innovation on Teaching the Handicapped.
Thomas, G., Anderson, D. and Nashon, S. (2008). “Development of an Instrument Designed to Investigate Elements of Science Students’ Metacognition, Self-Efficacy and Learning Processes: The SEMLI-S”. International Journal of Science Education. 30, (13), (17). 1701–1724.
Ronald K. Thornton, R. K. & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). “Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula”. Am. J. Phys. 66, (4). 338-352.
Tipler, P. A. (1991). Fisika untuk Sains dan Teknik. Jilid 1. PT. Gelora Aksara Pratama. Penerbit Erlangga.
Wagner A., Altherr, S., Eckert, B., and Jodl, H. J. (2006). Multimedia in physics education: a video for the quantitative analysis of the centrifugal force and the Coriolis force. Eur. J. Phys. 27 (2006) L27–L30.
Weinert, F. E. and Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding. The Psycholigy of education and Instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers Hillsdale, New Jersey. London.
Weisberg, R.W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Wenning, C. J. and Wenning, R. E. (2006). “A generic model for inquiry-oriented lab in postsecondary introductory physics”. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 3(3). 24-33. Available at: http://www.phy.ilstu. edu/jpteo
Winn, W. and Snyder, D. (1998). Metacognition. Graduate Student, SDSU Depart-ment of Educational Technology
Yürük, N. (2007). “A Case Study of one Student’s Metaconteptual Process and the Changes in Her Alternative Conceptions of Force and Motion”. Eurasia Journal, Sciences & Technology Education. 3, (4). 305-325.
Zainul, A. (2008). Asesmen Sumatif dan Formatif. Makalah. PPs UPI. Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.
