• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

isprsarchives XL 7 W1 145 2013

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "isprsarchives XL 7 W1 145 2013"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

Loading

Gambar

Figure 1. The location of the test site
Table 1 and 2, respectively. Obviously, the overall accuracy of
Figure 3. Classification result: (a) proposed method, (b) supervised Wishart classifier

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

level 2A satellite optical image using SAR data (in other words the co-registration of optical and SAR data), over greater areas of Earth’s surface (not just small image patches),

On the basis of RMS height and the mean backscattering coefficient within each window, the groups of pixels are labeled as one of the major land cover types i.e., water, urban

RA1) To perform quantitative validation of the simulation model against real data and test the model sensitivity to vege- tation parameters. RA2) To use the simulation model

This research focused on the latter part by analysing the impact of uncertainty on land-use maps, obtained through a remote sensing interpretation chain involving

From the point of view of remote sensing and photogrammetry field, this article first took an overview of its applications on agriculture throughout past 3 decades, analyzed

1) The accuracy of three different SVM classifiers is much better than the traditional minimum distance classification. The Feature weighted& Mixed kernels SVM proposed in

The accuracy assessment was derived based on the available land cover maps for fuzzy post classification comparison, combined fuzzy spectral – temporal

In order to investigate the suitability of different input datasets for the classification of different land use / land cover types we also performed accuracy assessments for