104
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O. & Patton, B. R. (2012). Argumetation and formal reasoning skills in argumentation-based guided inquiry course. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 46 (12), hlm. 4756-4760.
Achmad, R. (2004). Kimia lingkungan. Yogyakarta: Andi Press.
Akinoglu, O. &Tandogan, R. O. (2007). The effects of problem-based active
learning in science education on student’s academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 6, hlm. 1205-1209.
Arifin, M. (1984). Pengembangan program pengajaranbidangstudikimia. Surabaya: Airlangga Press.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Statistikkonsepdasardanaplikasinya. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Arimbawa,P., Saida, I.W., &Tika,I.N. (2013) Pengaruh model pembelajaranberbasisproyekterhadapkemampuanpemecahanmasalah IPA sehari-hariditinjaudarimotivasiberprestasisiswa. E-Journal Program PascasarjanaUniversitasPendidikanGanesha, 3 (1),hlm.83-87.
Arends, R. I. (2009). Learning to teach. United States of America : The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Arnyana, I.B.P. (2007). Penerapanmodel
PBLpadapelajaranbiologiuntukmeningkatkankompetensidankemampuanbe rpikirkritissiswakelasX SMAN 1 Singarajatahunpelajaran 2006/2007.JurnalPendidikandanPengajaranUndiksa, 2 (2), hlm. 61-65.
Bao, L. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8 (5), hlm. 323-331.
Bekiroglu, F. O. &Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of the relationship between engagement in scientific argumentation and conceptual knowledge.
International Journal of science and Mathematics Education, 10, hlm. 1415-1443.
Berland, L. K.& Hammer, D. (2011). Framing of scientific argumentation.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8 (3), hlm 114-118.
Bilgin, I., Senocak, E. &Sosbilir, M. (2009). The effects of probem based learning
quantitative problems in gas concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Sains& Technology Education, 5 (2), hlm. 153-164.
Bottcher, F. &Meisert, A. (2011). Argumentation in science education: a model-based framework. Journal of science and Education, 20, hlm. 102-140.
Brown, N. J. S. (2010). The evidence- based reasoning framework: assessig scientific reasoning. Educational Assesssment, 15, hlm. 123-141.
Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., &Kutluca, A. Y. (2014). The quality of pre-service
science teachers’ argumantion: Influence of content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, hlm. 309-331.
Chen, C. T. & She, H. C. (2014). The effectiveness of scientific inquiry with/without integration of scientific reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14 (7), hlm. 511-516.
Choi, A., Hand, B. & Norton-Meier, L. (2013). Grade 5 student’s online argumentation about their in-class inquiry investigations. Research Science Education, 43 (5), hlm 724-738.
Christenson, N. (2012). Using the see-sep model to analyze upper secondary
student’s use of supporting reasons in arguing socioscientific issues.Journal Science Education Technology, 21 (3), hlm. 342-347.
Coladarci, T., Cobb, C. D., Minium, E.W. & Clarke, R.B. (2011). Fundamental of statistical reasoning in education. United States of America : Wiley.
Copi, I.M. & Cohen, C. (1990). Introduction to logic. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Dahar, R.W. (2011). Teori-teoribelajardanpembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Dawson, V. &Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: an indicator of scientific literacy?.International Journal of Science Education, 3 (11), hlm. 1421-1445.
Dawson, V. M, &Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing
students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetic. Research in Science Education, 40, hlm. 133-148.
De Graaff, E. &Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristic of problem based learnig.
Depdiknas. (2008). Pengembangan model pendidikankecakapanhidup. [Online]. Diaksesdari http://www.puskur.net
Depdiknas. (2013). Permendikbud No. 68 tahun 2013 tentangKurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Ding, L., Wei, X.& Mollohan, K. (2014). Does higher education improve student scientific reasoning skill?.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14 (5), hlm. 383-386.
Dolan, E & Grady, J. (2010). Recognizing students’ scientific reasoning: a tool for categorizing complexity of reasoning during teaching by inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, hlm. 31-55.
Dunbar, K. N. &Klahr, D. (2012). The oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning. USA: Oxford University Press.
Duschl, R. A. (2007). Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria. Science & Technology Education Library, 35, hlm. 159-175.
Eggen&Kauchak. (2012). Strategidanmodel pembelajaran. Jakarta :Indeks
Erduran, S., Ardac, D., &Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: case studies of pre-service secondary science teacher.
Eurasia Journal of Mathematic Science and Technology Education, 2 (2), hlm.1-14.
Erduran, S.&Jimenez, A. M. (2011). Argumentation in science education. Science & Technology Education Library, 39 (1),hlm. 158-173.
Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y. & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education. International Journal of STEM Education, 2 (1), hlm. 81-86.
Feierabend, T. (2012). Two approaches for analyzing students’ competence of
evaluation in group discussions about climate change.International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7 (4), 581-598.
Foong, C. C. &Daeniel, E. G. S. (2010). Assesing students’ argumentation made
in sosio-scientific contexts: the considerations of structural complexity and the depth of content knowledge. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 9, hlm. 1120-1127.
Frosch, C. A. (2015). Understanding the role of reasoning ability in mathematical achievement. [Online]. Diaksesdarihttp://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1419/paper0105.pdf.
Frutak, E. M. (2008). A framework for analyzing reasoning in science classroom discourse: paperpresented at the annual meeting of the American.
Educational Research Association, 14 (1), hlm. 39-44.
Gallagher, S. (1995). Implementing problem based learning in science classrooms.
School Science and Mathematics, 95 (3), hlm. 136-146
Gracia-Mila, M., Gilabert, S., Erduran, S., Feltton, M. (2013). The effect of argumentative task goal on the quality of argumentative discourse.
Research in Science Education, 97 (4), hlm. 497-523
Gulo, W. (2002).Strategibelajarmengajar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Gurlen, E. (2011). Problem the effect of problem based learning on learning outcomes, problem solving skillsand selfefficacy belief. Journal of Education, 5 (2), hlm. 62-63.
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/ gain score. United States of America: Indiana University.
Hakyolu, H. &Bekiroglu, F. O. (2011). Assesment of students science knowledge levels and involvement with argumentation. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subject in Education, 2 (1), hlm. 346-354.
Hamdayana, (2014). Model danmetodepembelajarankreatifdanberkarakter. Bogor: Ghilia Indonesia.
Han, J.(2013). Scientific reasoning: research, development, assessment. (Dissertation), The Ohio State University.
Hartati, R. (2015). Implementasi model problem based learning (PBL) padapembelajaranipaterpaduuntukmeningkatkanliterasisainsdankemamp
uanberpikirkritissiswakelasVII SMP
padamateripencemaranlingkungan.(Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Herawati, D. (2015).
Herman, T. (2007).
Pembelajaranberbasismasalahuntukmeningkatkankemampuanberpikirm atematistingkattinggisiswasekolahmenengahpertama. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Hmelo, C. & Silver. (2004). Problem based learning: what and how do students learn?.Educational Psychology Review, 16 (3), hlm. 235-262.
Holil, Anwar. (2009). Hakikatpembelajaran IPA2. Online. Diaksesdarihttp://anwarholil.blogspot.com/2009/01/hakikat-pembelajaran-ipa.html.
Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatansaintifikdankontekstualdalampembelajaranabad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hudoyo, H. (1979). Pengembangankurikulummatematika&pelaksanaannya di depankelas. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Hutapea, N. M. (2013). Peningkatankemampuanpenalaran, komunikasimatematisdankemandirianbelajarsiswa SMA melaluipembelajarangeneratif. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Inch, E. S. (2006). Critical thinking and communication: the use of reason in argument. Boston: Pearson Education.
Indrawati, (2000). Keterampilan proses sains. Bandung: PustakaRekaCipta.
Irwan, Z. D. (1996). Prinsip-prinsipekologi, ekosistem, lingkungandanpelestariannya. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Jalaludin, D. (2009). Penggunaan model
pembelajaranberbasismasalahdenganpendekataninkuiriterbimbinguntukm eningkatkanpenguasaankonseplistrikdinamisdankecakapanilmiahsiswadidi k SMA. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Jasin, M. (2011). Ilmualamiahdasar. Jakarta: Grafindo.
Jufri, W. (2013). Belajardanpembelajaransains. Bandung: PustakaRekaCipta
Juliawan, D. (2012). Pengaruh model
Johnson , E. B. (2010). Contextual teaching learning. Bandung: Kaifa.
Joko, S. (2012). Keefektifan model pembelajarankontekstualdenganpendekatan
open ended
dalamaspekpenalarandanpemecahanmasalahpadamaterisegitiga di kelas
VII. [Online].
Diaksesdarihttp//e-journal.upgrismg.ac.id/index.php/malihpeddas/article/view/64.
Kaya, E., Erdurn, S. & Cetin, P. S. (2010). High school students’ perception of argumentation.Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2, hlm. 3971-3975.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud No. 81 A tahun 2013 tentangpanduanpengembanganpembelajarankurikulum 2013. Jakarta: DirektoratPembinaanSekolahmenengah Pertama.
Keskin, S. C. (2013). Student cognitive awareness about of reasons of environmental problems. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28 (3), hlm. 378-381.
Klegeris, A. (2011).Impact of problem based learning in a large classroom setting: student perception and problem solving skills.Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 7 (4), hlm. 437-445.
Koenenman , M., Goedhart, M. &Ossevoort, M. (2013). Introducing pre-university students to primary scientific literatur through argumentation analysis. Research Science Education, 43 (9), hlm. 2009-2034
Koenig, K., Schen. M.&Bao, L. (2012). Explicitly targeting pre-service teacher scientific reasoning abilities and understanding of nature of science through an introductory science cource.Winter, 21 (2), hlm. 58-62
Konstantinidou, A. &Macagno, F. (2013). Understaning students’ reasoning: argumentation schemes as an interpretation method in science education.
Science & Education, 22, hlm. 1069-1087.
Kulatunga, U., Moog, R. S. & Lewis, J. E. (2013). Argumentation and participation patterns in general chemistry peer-led sessions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,50 (10), hlm. 1207-123.
Kuhn,D., &Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. World Applied Sciences Journal, 18 (5), hlm. 1245-1260.
studikuasieksperimenterhadapsiswakelas X SMA N 11 Bandung, (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Kusumaningsih, D. (2011).
Upayameningkatkankemampuanberpikirkritissiswakelas X-C SMA N 11 Yogyakarta melaluipembelajaranmatematikaperbandingantrigonometri.
[Online]. Diaksesdari
http//core.kmi.open.ac.uk/download/pdf/11859973.pdf.
Kuslan, L. &Stone,A. H. (1969). Teaching children science: an inquryapproachs.
California: Publishing Company, Inc.
Lawson, A. E. (2004). The nature and development of scientific reasoning: a synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematic Education, 2, hlm. 307-338.
Lazonder, A. W.&Drost, S. W. (2014). Advancing scientific reasoning in upper elementary classrooms: direct instruction versus task structuring. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15 (2), hlm 109-113.
Lee, C. Q.& She, H. C. (2010). Facilitating students’ conceptual change and scientific reasoning involving the unit of combustion. Research in Science Education, 40, hlm. 479-504.
Liliasari&Trawil, M. 2013.
Berpikirkompleksdanimplementasidalampembelajaran IPA. Makasar: UNM
Lohman, M. & Finkelstein, M. (2002). Designing case in problem based learning to foster problem solving skill. European Journal of Dental Education, 6 (2), hlm. 121-127.
Lyle, K. & Robinson, W. (2001). Teaching science problem solving: an overview of experimental work.Journal of Chemical Eduction, 78 (9), hlm. 1162-1165.
Majid, A. (2014). Implementasikurikulum 2013: Kajianteoritisdanpraktis.
Bandung: Interes.
Manurung, S. R. (2013). Pengembangan model pembelajarandengan media hiperteksberdasarkanskemapemecahanmasalahberintikanargumentasitoul min: suatustudipenerapanpada topic kinematika. (Disertasi). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Mercier, H.&heintz, C. (2014). Scientist’s argumentatif reasoning. Spinger Science and Business Media, 33, hlm. 513-524.
Muhson, A.
(2009).Peningkatanminatbelajardanpemahamanmahasiswamelaluipenerap an problem based learning.JurnalKependidikan, 39(2),hlm. 171-182.
Mujiyanto. (2012). Pengaruh model blended learning terhadappemahamankonsepditinjaudaripenalaran formal siswakelas X
SMAN 1 Balikpapan. [Online].
Diaksesdarihttp://karyailmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/disertasi/article/view/22 821.
Mulyasa, A. (2010). Model pembelajaraninkuiridenganmenggunakan virtual
laboratory dan real laboratory
untukmeningkatkanpenguasaankonsepdankemampuanpenalaransiswasma padatopiklistrikdinamis. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Muslim. (2014). Pengembanganprogram
perkuliahanfisikasekolahberorientasikemampuanberargumentasicalon guru fisika. (Disertasi). UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Mustafa, S. P. (2013). Pengaruhmodel
pembelajarangeneratifterhadapkemampuan pemecahan masalah dan penalaransiswa. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
National Research Council.(1996). National science education standards. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
Newman, M. J. (2011). Problem based learning: an introduction and overview of the key feature of the approach. Journal of Veterinary, 23 (3), hlm. 12-20.
Nurdini, S. (2013).
Pengaruhpembelajaranberbasismasalahterhadapkemampuanpemecahanm asalahdanketerampilan proses IPA siswapadasistemekskresi. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikanIndnesia, Bandung.
Nuryanti,P.(2010). Pengaruh model
pembelajaranberbasispraktikumterhadapketerampilan proses sains, sikapilmiahdanpenguasaankonsepsistemregulasi. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Novianawati. (2015).
unakan model levels of inquiry. JurnalPendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4 (1), hlm. 19 – 25.
Osborne, J.(2001). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School Science Review, 41 (10), hlm. 994-1020.
Redhana, I. W.
(2012).Modelpembelajaranberbasismasalahdanpertanyaansocratikuntukme ningkatkanketerampilanberpikirkritissiswa. JurnalCakrawalaPendidikan, 3 (1), hlm. 13-17.
Redjeki, S. (2014). Model-model pembelajaran yang mendukungkurikulum2013.
Makalah.UniversitasKuningan.
Roshayanti, F. (2012).Pengembangan model
asesmenargumentatifuntukmengukurketerampilanargumentasimahasiswap adakonsepfisiologimanusia.JurnalCakrawalaPendidikan, 3 (2), hlm. 63-68.
Rusmono. (2014). Strategipembelajarandenganproblem based learning ituperlu. untukmeningkatkanprofesionalitas guru. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Rustaman, N. Y. (2007). Assesmendalampembelajaransains. Bandung: UPI.
Rutherford, F. J. &Ahlgren, A., (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sadia, I. W. (2007). Pengembangankemampuanberpikir formal siswaSMA
melaluipenerapan model pembelajaran “problem based learning” dan “cycle learning” dalampembelajaranfisika.
JurnalPendidikandanPengajaranUndiksha, 1, hlm. 1-2.
Sani, R. A. (2014). Pembelajaransaintifikuntukimplementasikurikulum2013. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategipembelajaranberorientasistandar proses pendidikan. Bandung: KencanaPrenada Media Group.
Santrock, J. W. (2013).Children. New York: The Mc-Graw Hill Companies, Inc
Sitohang, K., Rima, F., Molan, B. (2012). Critical thingkingmembangunpemikiranlogis. Jakarta: SinarHarapan.
Sitorus, A. (2011).
PeningkatankemampuanpenalarandanpemecahanmasalahsiswaSMA menggunakanstrategipembelajaranpeningkatankemampuanberpikir.[Onlin e]. Diaksesdari http//diglib.unnimed.ac.id/bookmark/1334/senior.
Slameto. (2010). Belajardanfaktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rinekacipta.
Sprod, T. (1998). “I can change your opinion on that”: social constructivist whole
class discussions and their effect on scientific reasoning. Research in Science Education, 28 (4), hlm. 463-480.
Sudjana. (2005). Metodastatistik. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sugiyono. (2013) Metodepenelitianpendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suharnan. (2012).
Penerapanpendekatanklasifikasiuntukmeningkatkanpengetahuankonsepdu niatumbuhandanpenalaransiswa SMA berdasarkan gender.(Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Sund R. R. &Trowbrbge, L. W. (1973). Teaching science by inquiry in the secondary school, 22nd ed. Ohio: Merill Pub. Howell Company.
Sunu. (2001). MelindungilingkungandenganmenerapkanISO. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Suparno, P. (2001). Teoriperkembangankognitif jean piaget. Yogjakarta :Kanisius.
Surapranata. S. (2009). Analisis, validitas, reliabilitas dan interpretasi hasil tes. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Sutopo&Waldrip, B. (2014). Impact of a representational approach on students’ reasoning and conceptual understanding in learning mechanics.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12 (7), hlm. 741-765.
Tarigan, E. A. (2015). Penerapan PBL
Tatar, E. &Oktaym, M. (2011). The effectiveness of problem based learning on teaching the first law of thermodynamics.Research in Science and Technological Education. 29(3), hlm. 315-332.
Tjasyono, B. (2004). Klimatologi. Bandung:ITB.
Tosun, C. &Taskesenligil,Y. (2011). The effect of problem based learning on student motivation towards chemistry classes and on learning strategies.Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9 (1), hlm. 126-131.
Trianto. (2014). Model pembelajaranterpadu, konsep, strategi, danimplementasinyadalamkurikulumtingkatsatuanpendidikan (KTSP).
Jakarta : PT BumiAksara.
Toharudin, U. (2011). Membangunliterasisains. Bandung:Humaniora
Tytler, R., Haslam, F., Prain, V.&Hubber, P. (2009). An explicit representational focus for teaching and learning about animals in the environment.
Teaching Science, 55(4), hlm. 21-27.
Tytler, R.& Peterson, S. (2003). Tracing young children’s scientific reasoning.
Research in Science Education, 33 (3), hlm. 433-465.
Varma, K. (2014). Supporting scientific experimentation and reasoning in young elementay school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23,hlm. 381-397.
Vasconcelos, C. (2010). Teaching environmental education through PBL: evaluation of a teaching intervention program. Research Science Education, 40 (1), hlm. 219-232.
Verheij, B. (2005). Evaluating argument based on Toulmin’s scheme.Argumentation Journal, 19, hlm. 347-371
Waldrip, B. (2012). Reasoning through representing in school science. Teaching Science, 58 (1), hlm. 14-18.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V.&Sellings, P. (2013). Explaining Newton’s Laws of motion: using student reasoning through representation to develop conceptual understanding. Instructional Science, 41, hlm. 165-189.
Widodo, L. W. (2013).
NegeriDonomulyoKulonProgotahunpelajaran 2012/2013. JurnalFisika Indonesia,17(49), hlm. 1410-2994.
Wikipedia. (2013). Indeksstandarpencemarudara. [Online]. Diaksesdarihttp://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indeks_Standar_Pencemar_Udara
Winter. (2001). Speaking of teaching. Stanford University Newsletter On Teaching, 11(1), hlm. 1-6.
Wong, K. K. H.& Day, J. R.. (2009). A comparative study of problem-based and lecture-based learning in junior secondary school science. Research Science Education, 39 (4), hlm. 625-642.
Wu, Y. T. & Tsai, C. C. (2011). The effects of different online searching activities on high school students’ cognitive structures and information reasoning regarding a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 41 (6), hlm. 771-785.
Wulandari, N. (2015). Implementasi model problem based learning (PBL) pada pembelajaran ipa terpadu untuk meningkatkan literasisains dan keterampilan pemecahan masalah siswa smp pada materi kalor. (Tesis). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Yang, F. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Reasoning about Science –related uncertain issue and epistemological perspectives among children. Instructional Science, 3, hlm. 325-354.
Yuliati, L. &Zulaika, S. (2013). Pengaruhintegrative learning terhadappenguasaankonsepkemampuanpemecahanmasalahfisikasiswakelas X. Proceeding Seminar Nasional IPA V (hlm. 332-335). Semarang : UNNES
