• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Pengaruh Persepsi Tentang Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan Terhadap Pasien Pulang Atas Permintaan Sendiri di Rumah Sakit Advent Medan Tahun 2014

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Pengaruh Persepsi Tentang Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan Terhadap Pasien Pulang Atas Permintaan Sendiri di Rumah Sakit Advent Medan Tahun 2014"

Copied!
41
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Lampiran 1

LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN

Saya yang namanya tersebut dibawah ini :

Nama

:

Umur

:

Alamat

:

No. Hp

:

Setelah mendapatkan penjelasan mengenai manfaat penelitian yang berjudul

“Pengaruh Persepsi tentang Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan Terhadap Pasien Pulang Atas

Permintaan Sendiri di Rumah Sakit Advent Kota Medan Tahun 2014”, maka kami

menyatakan untuk tidak keberatan untuk menjadi responden dalam penelitian

tersebut.

Yang Menyatakan

Responden

(2)

Lampiran 2

KUESIONER PENELITIAN

Medan, Januari 2014

Kepada Yth.

Bapak / Ibu Responden

Di Tempat

Dengan Hormat,

Bersama surat ini kami sampaikan bahwa dalam rangka untuk meningkatkan

kualitas pelayanan kesehatan yang ada di Rumah Sakit Advent Kota Medan, maka

kami bermaksud melakukan penelitian tentang pengaruh persepsi tentang mutu

pelayanan kesehatan terhadap pasien pulang atas permintaan sendiri di Rumah Sakit

Advent Kota Medan. Untuk itu kami mohon kesediaan Bapak/Ibu sekalian untuk

menjadi responden dalam penelitian ini dan dapat mengisi kuesioner yang kami

berikan sesuai dengan kondisi yang sebenarnya. Kami akan menjamin kerahasiaan

terhadap apapun yang telah Bapak/Ibu berikan dan tidak akan mengurangi kualitas

pelayanan yang akan Bapak/Ibu terima.

Demikian atas partisipasi dan kerjasamanya kami ucapkan terima kasih.

Hormat Saya.

Peneliti

(3)

KUESIONER

PENGARUH PERSEPSI TENTANG MUTU PELAYANAN KESEHATAN

TERHADAP PASIEN PULANG ATAS PERMINTAAN SENDIRI

DIRUMAH SAKIT ADVENT TAHUN 2014 KOTA MEDAN

Responden

: ...

Identitas Responden

1.

Nama

: ...

2.

Umur / Tanggal Lahir

: ...

3.

Jenis Kelamin

: Laki – Laki Perempuan

4.

Pendidikan

:

SD

SLTP

SLTA

Akademik / DIII

S.1 / S.2

5. Pekerjaan

: Pegawai Swasta / PNS

Wiraswata / Pedagang

Petani

Buruh

Tidak Bekerja

(4)

Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan

Petunjuk : Mohon Bapak / Ibu mengisi dengan memberi tanda chek list (

√) pada

kolom sesuai dengan jawaban saudara berdasarkan pelayanan yang anda

terima.

Keterangan :

SP

= Sangat Puas

(Skore 5)

P

= Puas

(Skore 4)

RR

= Ragu-Ragu

(Skore 3)

TP

= Tidak Puas

(Skore 2)

STP

= Sangat Tidak Puas (Skore 1)

1.

Bukti Fisik (Penampilan Pelayanan) / Tangible

No

Pernyataan

SP

P RR TP STP

1

Halaman parkir luas dan nyaman.

2

Keadaan rumah sakit bersih dan nyaman.

3

Terdapat keberadaan dan penempatan papan

petunjuk yang jelas.

4

Tempat tidur bersih dan nyaman.

5

Peralatan medis lengkap dan canggih serta sesuai

dengan apa yang dibutuhkan pasien.

6

Peralatan medis bersih.

7

Kamar mandi pasien bersih dan wangi.

8

Penampilan petugas administrasi bersih dan rapi.

9

Penampilan perawat bersih dan rapi.

10. Penampilan dokter bersih dan rapi.

2.

Kehandalan Pelayanan / Reliability

a.

Pelayanan Administrasi

No

Pernyataan

SP

P RR TP STP

1

Pendaftaran Pasien dapat dilakukan dengan cepat

dan tepat.

2

Prosedur pelayanan pasien di bagian administrasi

tidak berbelit- belit.

3

Petugas administrasi memberikan pelayanan yang

informatif, ramah dan sopan.

(5)

b.

Pelayanan Dokter

No

Pernyataan

SP

P RR TP STP

1

Dokter ramah dalam berkomunikasi

2

Dokter menjelaskan tentang keadaan pasien.

3

Dokter berkunjung secara teratur dan tepat waktu.

4

Dokter mampu menentukan penyakit pasien dan

tindakan medis selanjutnya.

c.

Pelayanan Perawat

No

Pernyataan

SP

P RR TP STP

1

Perawat berkomunikasi ramah dan sopan dengan

pasien.

2

Perawat Menanggapi Keluhan Pasien

3

Perawat melayani pasien (memandikan,memberi

makan,memberi obat).

4

Perawat menggantikan seprei dalam waktu

tertentu.

d.

Fasilitas Makanan

No

Pernyataan

SP

P RR TP STP

1

Makanan memiliki cita rasa yang baik.

2

Makanan disajikan secara teratur dan tepat waktu.

3

Makanan disajikan dalam keadaan hangat.

4

Menu makanan bervariasi.

e.

Pelayanan Petugas Obat

No

Pernyataan

SP

P RR TP STP

1

Petugas obat menjelaskan penggunaan obat.

2

Obat yang diresepkan dokter tersedia dengan baik

jenis maupun jumlahnya.

3

Prosedur penagihan resep obat tidak berbelit.

(6)

f.

Fasilitas Ruang Rawat Inap

No

Pernyataan

SP

P RR TP STP

1

Ruang rawat inap bersih,nyaman dan tertata rapi

serta adanya ventilasi yang cukup.

2

Ketersediaan air kamar mandi tetap diperhatikan

petugas.

3

Ketersediaan bel untuk memanggil petugas.

4

Penerangan ruang rawat inap diperhatikan secara

teratur.

3.

Daya tanggap / Responsiviness

No

Pernyataan

SP

P RR TP STP

1

Dokter memberikan respon cepat terhadap

keluhan pasien.

2

Perawat merespon setiap keluhan dari pasien.

3

Dokter bersedia membantu pasien setiap saat.

4

Perawat bersedia membantu pasien setiap saat.

5

Tindakan pertolongan cepat dan tepat.

4.

Jaminan / Assurance

No

Pernyataan

SP

P RR TP STP

1

Dokter terampil dan cepat menetapkan diagnosis.

2

Perawat terampil dalam melaksanakan tugasnya.

3

Pasien tidak lama menunggu diagnosis maupun

pelayanan medis di rumah sakit.

(7)

5.

Perhatian Pelayanan / Empathy

No

Pernyataan

SP

P RR TP STP

1

Pelayanan kepada pasien tidak memandang status

sosial dan lain – lain.

2

Petugas dengan sabar melayani kebutuhan pasien.

3

Perawat memberikan perhatian yang baik kepada

pasien.

4

Dokter memberikan perhatian yang baik kepada

pasien.

(8)
(9)
(10)

Lampiran 4

OUTPUT Frequency Table

Umur katagori

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid < 40 tahun 25 40.3 40.3 40.3

>= 40 tahun 37 59.7 59.7 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0

Jenis Kelamin Responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid SMP 4 6.5 6.5 6.5

SMA 35 56.5 56.5 62.9

Sarjana 23 37.1 37.1 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0

Pekerjaan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(11)

Bukti Fisik 1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(12)

Bukti Fisik 5

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(13)

Bukti Fisik 9

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Bukti Fisik 10

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Bukti fisik

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Baik 17 27.4 27.4 27.4

Kurang baik 45 72.6 72.6 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0

Pelayanan Administrasi 1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Administrasi 2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Sangat tidak puas 19 30.6 30.6 30.6

Ragu-ragu 43 69.4 69.4 100.0

(14)

Pelayanan Administrasi 3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Administrasi 4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Dokter 1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Dokter 2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(15)

Pelayanan Dokter 3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Dokter 4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Perawat 1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Perawat 2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(16)

Pelayanan Perawat 3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Perawat 4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Makan 1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Makan 2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(17)

Pelayanan Makan 3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Makan 4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Petugas Obat 1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Petugas Obat 2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(18)

Pelayanan Petugas Obat 3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayanan Petugas Obat 4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayan Ruang Rawat Inap 1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayan Ruang Rawat Inap 2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(19)

Pelayan Ruang Rawat Inap 3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Pelayan Ruang Rawat Inap 4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid baik 26 41.9 41.9 41.9

tidak baik 36 58.1 58.1 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0

Daya Tanggap 1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(20)

Daya Tanggap 2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Daya Tanggap 3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Daya Tanggap 4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Daya Tanggap 5

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(21)

Daya Tanggap

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(22)

Jaminan 4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Jaminan Kepastian

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid baik 26 41.9 41.9 41.9

kurang baik 36 58.1 58.1 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0

Perhatian 1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(23)

Perhatian 2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Perhatian 3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Perhatian 4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Perhatian 5

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(24)

Perhatian

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid baik 31 50.0 50.0 50.0

kurang baik 31 50.0 50.0 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0

Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid >= 3 hari 24 38.7 38.7 38.7

< 3 hari 38 61.3 61.3 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0

Bukti fisik * Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Crosstab

Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Total >= 3 hari < 3 hari

Bukti fisik Baik Count 6 11 17

% within Bukti fisik 35.3% 64.7% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 25.0% 28.9% 27.4%

% of Total 9.7% 17.7% 27.4%

Kurang baik Count 18 27 45

% within Bukti fisik 40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 75.0% 71.1% 72.6%

% of Total 29.0% 43.5% 72.6%

Total Count 24 38 62

% within Bukti fisik 38.7% 61.3% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(25)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .115a 1 .734

Continuity Correctionb .002 1 .962

Likelihood Ratio .116 1 .733

Fisher's Exact Test .779 .485

Linear-by-Linear Association .113 1 .736

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.58. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Kehandalan * Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Crosstab

Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Total >= 3 hari < 3 hari

Kehandalan baik Count 15 11 26

% within Kehandalan 57.7% 42.3% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 62.5% 28.9% 41.9%

% of Total 24.2% 17.7% 41.9%

kurang baik Count 9 27 36

% within Kehandalan 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 37.5% 71.1% 58.1%

% of Total 14.5% 43.5% 58.1%

Total Count 24 38 62

% within Kehandalan 38.7% 61.3% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(26)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.801a 1 .009

Continuity Correctionb 5.493 1 .019

Likelihood Ratio 6.848 1 .009

Fisher's Exact Test .017 .009

Linear-by-Linear Association 6.691 1 .010

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.06. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Daya Tanggap * Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Crosstab

Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Total >= 3 hari < 3 hari

Daya Tanggap baik Count 9 5 14

% within Daya Tanggap 64.3% 35.7% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 37.5% 13.2% 22.6%

% of Total 14.5% 8.1% 22.6%

kurang baik Count 15 33 48

% within Daya Tanggap 31.2% 68.8% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 62.5% 86.8% 77.4%

% of Total 24.2% 53.2% 77.4%

Total Count 24 38 62

% within Daya Tanggap 38.7% 61.3% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(27)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 4.986a 1 .026

Continuity Correctionb 3.691 1 .055

Likelihood Ratio 4.888 1 .027

Fisher's Exact Test .033 .028

Linear-by-Linear Association 4.905 1 .027

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.42. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Jaminan Kepastian * Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Crosstab

Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Total >= 3 hari < 3 hari

Jaminan Kepastian baik Count 7 19 26

% within Jaminan

Kepastian 26.9% 73.1% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 29.2% 50.0% 41.9%

% of Total 11.3% 30.6% 41.9%

kurang baik Count 17 19 36

% within Jaminan

Kepastian 47.2% 52.8% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 70.8% 50.0% 58.1%

% of Total 27.4% 30.6% 58.1%

Total Count 24 38 62

% within Jaminan

Kepastian 38.7% 61.3% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(28)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.622a 1 .105

Continuity Correctionb 1.836 1 .175

Likelihood Ratio 2.677 1 .102

Fisher's Exact Test .122 .087

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.580 1 .108

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.06. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Perhatian * Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Crosstab

Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Total >= 3 hari < 3 hari

Perhatian baik Count 17 14 31

% within Perhatian 54.8% 45.2% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 70.8% 36.8% 50.0%

% of Total 27.4% 22.6% 50.0%

kurang baik Count 7 24 31

% within Perhatian 22.6% 77.4% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 29.2% 63.2% 50.0%

% of Total 11.3% 38.7% 50.0%

Total Count 24 38 62

% within Perhatian 38.7% 61.3% 100.0%

% within Pasien pulang

permintaan sendiri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(29)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.798a 1 .009

Continuity Correctionb 5.507 1 .019

Likelihood Ratio 6.959 1 .008

Fisher's Exact Test .018 .009

Linear-by-Linear Association 6.689 1 .010

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 62 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 62 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 62 100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding Original

Value Internal Value

>= 3 hari 0

< 3 hari 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Predicted

Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Percentage Correct >= 3 hari < 3 hari

Step 0 Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

>= 3 hari 0 24 .0

< 3 hari 0 38 100.0

Overall Percentage 61.3

(30)

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant .460 .261 3.106 1 .078 1.583

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares value has decreased from the previous step.

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 64.364a .257 .348

2 65.716a .240 .326

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Classification Tablea

Observed

Predicted

Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

Percentage Correct >= 3 hari < 3 hari

Step 1 Pasien pulang permintaan sendiri

>= 3 hari 12 12 50.0

(31)

Overall Percentage 72.6 Step 2 Pasien pulang permintaan

sendiri

>= 3 hari 13 11 54.2

< 3 hari 5 33 86.8

Overall Percentage 74.2

a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: RKAT, DTKAT, JKAT, PKAT.

Model if Term Removed

Variable

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Step 2a Variables JKAT 1.348 1 .246

Overall Statistics 1.348 1 .246

(32)

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.928 10

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

(33)

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

29.1667 48.351 6.95346 10

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.789 4

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Pelayanan Administrasi 1 1.9333 .82768 30

Pelayanan Administrasi 2 2.0667 1.01483 30

Pelayanan Administrasi 3 1.8000 .88668 30

Pelayanan Administrasi 4 1.9667 .76489 30

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Pelayanan Administrasi 1 5.8333 4.282 .758 .659

Pelayanan Administrasi 2 5.7000 4.493 .474 .814

Pelayanan Administrasi 3 5.9667 4.378 .647 .712

Pelayanan Administrasi 4 5.8000 5.062 .557 .759

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

(34)

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.780 4

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Pelayanan Dokter 1 3.0667 .52083 30

Pelayanan Dokter 2 2.9333 .63968 30

Pelayanan Dokter 3 2.5667 .81720 30

Pelayanan Dokter 4 3.2333 .81720 30

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Pelayanan Dokter 1 8.7333 3.168 .764 .674

Pelayanan Dokter 2 8.8667 3.016 .644 .701

Pelayanan Dokter 3 9.2333 2.599 .603 .722

Pelayanan Dokter 4 8.5667 2.944 .444 .813

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

(35)

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.798 4

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Pelayanan Perawat 1 3.0000 .58722 30

Pelayanan Perawat 2 2.6000 .77013 30

Pelayanan Perawat 3 3.1333 .50742 30

Pelayanan Perawat 4 2.5333 .77608 30

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Pelayanan Perawat 1 8.2667 3.237 .424 .827

Pelayanan Perawat 2 8.6667 2.092 .805 .636

Pelayanan Perawat 3 8.1333 3.085 .637 .751

Pelayanan Perawat 4 8.7333 2.340 .647 .734

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

(36)

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.947 4

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Pelayanan Makan 1 3.4333 .97143 30

Pelayanan Makan 2 3.3000 .98786 30

Pelayanan Makan 3 3.3000 .98786 30

Pelayanan Makan 4 3.3333 .99424 30

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Pelayanan Makan 1 9.9333 7.582 .914 .918

Pelayanan Makan 2 10.0667 7.857 .827 .945

Pelayanan Makan 3 10.0667 7.651 .876 .930

Pelayanan Makan 4 10.0333 7.620 .875 .930

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

(37)

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.765 4

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Pelayanan Petugas Obat 1 3.1333 .57135 30

Pelayanan Petugas Obat 2 2.5333 .77608 30

Pelayanan Petugas Obat 3 2.9667 .61495 30

Pelayanan Petugas Obat 4 3.1667 .59209 30

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Pelayanan Petugas Obat 1 8.6667 2.713 .452 .764

Pelayanan Petugas Obat 2 9.2667 2.271 .434 .803

Pelayanan Petugas Obat 3 8.8333 2.213 .710 .633

Pelayanan Petugas Obat 4 8.6333 2.240 .733 .625

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

(38)

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.808 4

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Pelayan Ruang Rawat Inap 1 2.93 .868 30

Pelayan Ruang Rawat Inap 2 3.13 .937 30

Pelayan Ruang Rawat Inap 3 3.13 .900 30

Pelayan Ruang Rawat Inap 4 3.00 .983 30

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Pelayan Ruang Rawat Inap 1 9.27 5.030 .735 .709

Pelayan Ruang Rawat Inap 2 9.07 4.616 .783 .678

Pelayan Ruang Rawat Inap 3 9.07 5.789 .474 .827

Pelayan Ruang Rawat Inap 4 9.20 5.269 .535 .805

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

(39)

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.714 5

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Daya Tanggap 1 9.70 4.424 .538 .664

Daya Tanggap 2 9.43 6.047 .613 .620

Daya Tanggap 3 9.70 6.631 .363 .706

Daya Tanggap 4 9.50 6.121 .597 .627

Daya Tanggap 5 9.27 6.892 .364 .704

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

(40)

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.802 5

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Jaminan 1 10.10 5.886 .631 .750

Jaminan 2 10.00 6.069 .521 .786

Jaminan 3 10.00 6.483 .489 .793

Jaminan 4 9.60 5.834 .587 .764

Jaminan 5 10.17 6.006 .731 .726

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

(41)

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.707 5

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Perhatian 1 11.13 5.154 .520 .636

Perhatian 2 11.87 6.257 .482 .656

Perhatian 3 12.67 6.161 .596 .624

Perhatian 4 12.23 6.806 .415 .683

Perhatian 5 12.10 4.990 .432 .698

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

[r]

Kelompok Kerja Unit Layanan Pengadaan Daerah Kementerian Keuangan Provinsi Jawa Barat melaksanakan Pelelangan Paket Pekerjaan Pengadaan Jasa Konsultansi Perencanaan

Panitia Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa pada BP2IP Malahayati Aceh Kementerian Perhubungan akan melaksanakan Pelelangan Umum dengan pascakualifikasi untuk paket pekerjaan

Sastrawan terkenal seperti al- Akhthal, Farazdaq dan Jarîr jika diapresiasi secara mendalam maka muatan tema yang ekspresikan banyak menggambarkan situasi sosial

Indosat Tbk is a leading telecommunication and information service provider in Indonesia that provides cellular services (Mentari, Matrix and IM3), fixed telecommunication services

[r]

Melalui website inilah dapat memudahkan konsumen dalam memesan keramik tanpa harus bersusah payah mencari keramik ke toko-toko material yang dapat membuang-buang waktu dan

Relevansi antara konsep pendidikan perspektif Ibnu Khaldun dengan pendidikan Islam kontemporer di Indonesia adalah Ibnu Khaldun memiliki konsep dasar untuk