Testing Partial as Counselor spirit Determinants direction (M1), the Visionary Leadership (Y), agents of change (M2), the Visionary Leadership (Y), Speaker Bi- means

STUDY PROGRAM AND PERFOMANCE OF LECTURER TO VISIONARY LEADERSHIP AT ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY 45 BEKASI

3) Testing Partial as Counselor spirit Determinants direction (M1), the Visionary Leadership (Y), agents of change (M2), the Visionary Leadership (Y), Speaker Bi- means

(M3) of the Visionary Leadership (Y), Coach (M4) of the Visionary Leadership (Y) and performance Lecturer (X2) and Significant Positive Effect on Visionary Leadership

Figure 4. Partial Testing Head of Study Program

Discussion

Head of quality management courses in his capacity as a bellwether, a change agent, a spokesman and trainer significant and positive effect on the performance of lecturers by 84.8% (the head of the study program) and 59.3% (lecturer). Results of statistical test of the hypothesis of quality management in his capacity as a bellwether positive and significant effect on the performance of lecturers. The research instrument aimed at the group of heads of courses and professors turned out to show a different conclusion. Head of the program to study the results of t = 1,751 <2,012 ttabel thus Ho is accepted (no significant positive effect). As for lecturers on the calculation t = 5,085>

1,665 ttabel thus H0 (there is a positive and significant influence between the two).

Results of statistical test of the hypothesis of the quality management study program heads in their capacity as agents of change and significant positive effect on the performance of the lecturer shows a different conclusion. For the head of the program of study results of t = 2,616> 2,012 ttabel thus H0 (there is a positive and

No Hypho-

thesis Coeffi-cient Line t calculat-

ed t table Decision Conculusi

on

1 Pyx = 0 0.729 9.460 1.664 H₀ rejected Significant 2 Pzx = 0 0.326 3.207 1.991 H₀ rejected Significant 3 Pzy = 0 0.520 5.116 1.991 H₀ rejected Significant

Alternative Hypothesis F calculated F table Decision Conculusion

M1,M2,M3 and M4 Simultaneously Influence Y

27.659 2.492 H0

rejected Significant

No Hyphot- hesis

Coeffi- cient Line

t calcu l-ated

t

table Decisio

n Conculus

ion

1 Pyx1= 0 -0.125 1.751 2.012 H₀ accepted

Not Significant 2 Pyx2= 0 -0.006 -2.616 2.012 H₀

accepted Not Significant 3 Pyx3= 0 0.319 3.515 2.012 H₀

rejected

Significant

4 Pyx4= 0 0.225 3.813 2.012 H0

rejected

Significant

5 Pzy= 0 0.534 5.191 1.665 H₀ rejected

Significant No Hypho-

thesis Coeffi-cient Line t calculat-

ed t table Decision Conculusi

on

Enriching Quality and Providing Affordable Education through New Academia | 101

significant influence). As for lecturers test results t = -1914 <1.665 t table thus H0 is accepted (no positive and significant influence between the two).

The results of hypothesis testing head of quality management courses in his capacity as spokesman positive and significant effect on the performance of good lecturers for courses and faculty head suggests the same conclusion. For the head of the program of study results of t = 3,515> 2,012 ttabel thus Ho is rejected (there are positive influence and significant. As for lecturers t = 2,359> 1,665 ttabel thus Ho is rejected (there are significant positive and significant correlation between the two).

The results of hypothesis testing quality management in his capacity as coach of positive and significant effect on the performance of good lecturers to Head lecturer studimaupun program suggests the same conclusion. to Head studihasil program t = 3,515> 2,012 ttabel thus Ho is rejected.

Conclusion There are positive and significant influence between management mutudalam capacity as the spokesman of the performance of lecturers. As for lecturers t = 2,359> 1,665 ttabel thus H0 is rejected. Conclusion there are significant positive and significant correlation between the two.

Head of quality management courses in his capacity as a bellwether, a change agent, a spokesman and trainer positive and significant impact on the visionary leadership of the Islamic University 45 Bekasi by 89.3% (Head of Study Program) and 67.6% (lecturer). Thus the hypothesis test conducted at the Head of the study program derive the percentage is higher than lecturers. However, results of hypothesis testing both reached the same conclusion that is positive and significant. Head of quality management courses in his capacity as a bellwether positive and significant impact on the visionary leadership of the Bekasi Islamic University 45 does not apply either to the head of the study program and lecturers. Head of the program to study the results of t = -0849 <1679 ttabel thus H0 is accepted (no significant effect between the leadership in his capacity as a determinant of the direction of the performance of lecturers). Similarly for lecturer on the calculation t = -1149 <1.665 ttabel thus H0 is accepted (no positive and significant effect on both).

Head of quality management courses in their capacity as agents of change positive and significant impact on the visionary leadership of the Islamic University 45 Bekasi. Head of the program to study the results of t = 3,688> 1,679 ttabel thus H0 (there are significant quality management study program heads in their capacity as agents of change on the performance of lecturers positive and significant). As for the results lecturer t = -0064, <1.665 ttabel thus H0 is accepted (no significant effect between the two). Head of quality management courses in his capacity as spokesman positive and significant impact on the visionary leadership of the Islamic University 45 Bekasi. For the head of the program of study results tcount 0713 <1679 ttabel thus H0 is accepted (no effect is positive and significant correlation between mutudalam management capacity as the spokesman of the performance of lecturers). As for lecturers t = 3,563> 1,665 ttabel thus H0.ditolak (there is a positive and significant influence between the two).

Head of quality management courses in his capacity as coach of positive and significant impact on the visionary leadership of the Islamic University 45 Bekasi. Head of the program to study the results of t = -1188 <1679 ttabel thus H0. The conclusion does not influence a positive and significant correlation between the quality management program head study in the capacity as the spokesman of the performance of lecturers. As for the results lecturer t = 2,346> 1,665 ttabel thus H0 is rejected.

Conclusion there are significant positive and significant correlation between the two.

Enriching Quality and Providing Affordable Education through New Academia | 102

Faculty performance consisting of competence, berpresatasi motif, and the work environment influence positively and significantly to the visionary leadership of the Islamic University 45 Bekasi. Head of the program to study the results of t = 7598,>

1,679 ttabel thus H0 (no influence positive and significant correlation between the performance of lecturers consisting of competence, berpresatasi motif, and the work environment to the visionary leadership of the Islamic University 45 Bekasi). As for lecturers t = 5,191> 1,665 ttabel thus H0 (there is a positive and significant influence between the two).

Quality management and faculty performance and significant positive effect on the quality of the visionary leadership of the Islamic University 45 Bekasi by 86.8%

(Head of Study Program) and 62.3% (lecturer). Thus the hypothesis test conducted at the Head of the study program derive the percentage is higher than lecturers. However, both results of hypothesis testing both reached the same conclusion that is positive and significant.

Conclusion

Based on the discussion we concluded is that the overall quality management program head of the study and performance of lecturers affect positively and significantly to the visionary leadership of the university. Partially, the lowest average value is sub variables change agents and trainers, sub variable competency demonstrated in the category, sub variable empathy and productivity showed the moderate category. As for the other variables in the category sub high.

The results showed that the performance of lecturers in the category of being.

This means that they need no improvement competence of lecturers that include pedagogical, professional competence, social competence and personal competence.

The results of the research university quality variables for sub variable empathy and productivity showed the moderate category. Thus leaders should strive to be empathetic to the academic community through attention seriously to the aspirations and needs of all the people in the institution, be welcoming and polite, serve wholeheartedly, creates a conducive academic atmosphere, creating harmonious atmosphere, an open attitude and a pleasant atmosphere.

Meanwhile, productivity can be noticed on the productivity of the quality and quantity of graduates, research productivity, the productivity of community service, penguasaaan students in the academic field, and the results of student awards received.

References

Arcoro, Jerome S. (1995). Quality in Edication, An Implementation Hand Book. St Lucie Press. 100 Linton Blud. Suite 403 B Deray Beach. FL 33483.

Clark, Burton. (1983). The Higher Education System Academic Oragnization in Cross- National Perspective. Los Angeles London: University of California Press.

Directorate General of Higher Education. (2003). Guidelines for Quality Assurance Education High. Jakarta: Ministry of Education.

Hedwig, Rinda and Polla Gerardus. (2006). Model Quality Assurance System and Process Implementation in Higher Education. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

____________. (2007). Quality Assurance System in Higher Education Monitoring and

Evaluation. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Enriching Quality and Providing Affordable Education through New Academia | 103 Nanus, Burt. (1992). Visionary Leadership: How to Re-Vision the Future. Journal

the Futurist. 26, (5), 20.

Pierce, Bill. (1997). Visionary Leadership-- translating abstract purpose into concrete objectives. Journal of Physical Education. 68, (4), 34.

Robin, Stephen, (1996). Organizational Behavior Concepts, Controversies, App- lication.

New Jersey : A Simon & Schuster Company.

_____________ , (1988).

Organization Cultures.

Tose L. et al,

(1990) Managing Organizational Behavior.

New York : Harper Collins Publisher.

Sallis. Edward (1993).

Total Quality Management in Education.

Philadelphia: Kogan Page.

Stogdil, Ralph M. (1974). Handbook of Leadership a Survey of Theory and Research.

London: Collier Macmillan Publisher.

Stoner, James A. F., (1995). Management. New Delhi : Prentice Hall, Inc.

Sutermeister, A Robert, (1976). People and Productivity. New York : McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Sutisna, Oteng. (1993). Administration Education: Elementary Theory for Professional Practice. Bandung: Angkasa.

Tampubolon, Daulat P. (2001). Higher Education Quality New Paradigm of Higher

Education Management Challenges Facing the 21st Century. Jakarta: PT

GramediaPustaka Utama.

Enriching Quality and Providing Affordable Education through New Academia | 104