BAB 5 KESIMPULAN, DISKUSI DAN SARAN ....................................... 144-155
5.3 Saran Penelitian
5.3.2 Saran teoritis
1. Tidak hanya tes psikologi yang akan digunakan untuk pengambilan keputusan tentang individu seperti tes CFIT, tes psikologi lain (kuesioner, instrumen) yang digunakan untuk meneliti hubungan sebab akibat antar variabel sangat perlu untuk diuji measurement invariance. Hal ini penting diuji agar tidak terjadi kesalahan interpretasi dalam menerjemahkan hasil penelitian. Jika alat tes yang dipakai tidak memenuhi situasi measurement invariance, maka hasil penelitian tersebut akan tidak bermakna atau yang lebih berbahaya adalah menyesatkan. Sehingga diharapkan penelitian ilmiah di ilmu psikologi baik skripsi, thesis dan disertasi sudah mulai melakukan uji measurement invariance pada setiap instrumen penelitiannya.
2. Diharapkan pada penelitian selanjutnya, dilakukan uji validitas measurement invariance pada tes inteligensi CFIT menggunakan pendekatan item response theory (IRT). Hal ini perlu dilakukan sebagai metode pembanding dari pendekatan yang digunakan pada penelitian ini, yaitu confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Sehingga di masa yang akan datang akan didapatkan hasil yang lebih meyakinkan dan mendalam tentang kesahihan dari tes inteligensi CFIT.
3. Pada penelitian selanjutnya disarankan agar dilakukan penelitian yang mendalam tentang structural invariance, seperti factor variance invariance, factor covariance invariance dan latent mean structure. Hal ini penting untuk dilakukan agar penelitian tentang tes inteligensi CFIT
tidak berhenti sampai measurement invariance saja. Sehingga dapat membuka pemahaman baru untuk pengguna tes dan ilmuan tentang validitas tes inteligensi CFIT.
157
& Bacon.
Anastasi, Anne & Urbina, Susana. 1997. Psychological testing 7th edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Int.
Bollen, K.A. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Borsboom, D., Romeijn, J-W., & Wicherts, J. 2008. Measurement invariance vs selection invariance: Is fair selection possible?. Psychological Method.
13 (2), 75-98.
Borsboom, Denny. 2006. When does measurement invariance matter?. Medical Care. 44 (11), 176-181.
Brown, T.A. 2006. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York:
The Guilford Press.
Byrne, B.M., Shavelson, R.J., Muthen, B.O. 1989. Testing for equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin. 105 (3), 465-466.
Chadha, N.K. 2009. Applied psychometry. New Delhi: Chaman Enterprises.
Crocker, L. & Algina, J. 2008. Introduction to classical and modern test theory.
Ohio: Cengage Learning.
Embretson, S. & Reise, S.P. 2000. Item response theory for psychologist. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Gardner, Howard. 2011. Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences.
New York: Basic Books.
Golay, Philippe & Lecerf, Thierry. 2011. Orthogonal higher order structure and confirmatory factor analysis of the french weschler adult intelligence scale (WAIS-III). Psychological assessment. 23 (1), 143-152.
Gomez, R., Vence, A., & Gomez, A. 2011. Children’s depression inventory:
Invariance across children and adolescents and without depresive disorders. Psychological Assessment. DOI: 10.1037/a0024966.
Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H.J. 1991. Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park: Sage publications, Inc.
Hancock, G.R. & Mueller, R.O. 2006. Structural equation modeling: A second course. Connecticut: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Hayat, Bahrul. 1994. Pengantar model Rasch: Bahan penataran pengelolaan pengujian. Jakarta: Balitbang Kemendikbud.
Hesketh, S.R., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. 2004. Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychometrika. 69 (2), 167-190.
Hildebrandt, A., Sommer, W., Herzmann, G., & Wilhelm, O. 2010. Structural invariance and age-related performances differences in face cognition.
Psychology and Aging. 25 (4), 794-810.
Kankaras, M. & Moors, G. 2011. Measurement equivalence and extreme response bias in the comparison of attitudes across europe: A multigroup latent-class factor approach. Methodology. 7 (2), 68-80.
Kaplan, David. 2004. Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions.
California: Sage publication, Inc.
Kaufman, A.S & Lichtenberger, E.O. 2006. Introduction to the assessment of adolescent and adult intelligence. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Kaufman, James. & Grigorenko, Elena. L. 2009. The essential Sternberg: essay on intelligence, psychology, and education. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Kline, R.B. 2011. Principles and practices of structural equation modeling 3th edition. New York: The Guilford Press.
Kuhn, J-T. & Holling, H. 2009. Measurement invariance of divergent thinking across gender, age, and school forms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 25 (1), 1-7).
Li, Huijun., Lee, Donghyuck., Pfeiffer, S.I., Kamata, A., Kumtepe, A.T., Rosado, Javier. 2009. Measurement invariance of the gifted rating scales-school form across five cultural groups. Psychology Quarterly. (3), 186-198.
Maiano, C., Morin, A.J.S., Monthuy-Blanc, J., & Garbarino, J-M. 2010. Construct validity of the fear of negative appearence evaluation scale in community sample of French adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 26 (1), 19-27.
Marnat, G.G. 2006. The handbook of psychological assessment (4th Edition).
New Jersey: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Meade, A.W & Lautenschlager, G.J. 2004. Same questions, different answers:
CFA and two IRT approaches to measurement invariance. Paper Presented at the 19th Annual Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology Conference, Chicago, IL.
Meredith, W. & Teresi, J.A. 2006. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance. Medical Care. 44 (11) 69-77.
Milfont, T.L. & Fischer, R. 2010. Testing measurement invariance across groups:
Application in cross cultural research. International Journal for Psychological Research. 3 (1), 111-121
Miller, Patricia. 1989. Theories of developmental psychology 2nd edition. New York: Freeman.
Millsap, R.E. 2011. Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Mungas, D., Widaman, K.F., Reed, B.R., & Farias, S.T. 2011. Measurement invariance of neuropsychological tests in diverse older person.
Neuropsychology. 25 (2), 260-269.
Murphy, K.R & Davidshofer, C.O. 1994. Psychological testing: Principles and application. London: Prentice Hall Int.
Muthen, B.O. & Muthen, L.K. 2012. Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.
Nair, R.L., White, Rebecca M.B., Knight, G.P., & Roosa, M.W. 2009. Cross-language measurement equivalence of parenting measures for use with Mexican American populations. Journal of Family Psychology. 23 (5), 680-689.
Nenty, Johnson H. & Dinero, Thomas E. 1981. A cross-cultural analysis of the fairness of the Cattell culture fair intelligence test using the Rasch model.
Applied Psychological Measurement. 5 (3), 355-368.
Newman, D.A., Limbers, C.A., & Varni, J.W. 2010. Factorial invariance of child self-report across english and spanish language groups in hispanic population utilizing the PedsQLTM 4.0 generic core scales. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 26 (3), 194-202.
Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., Pastorelli, C., Connolly, J., Pepler, D., & Craig, W.
2011. Physical dating aggression in adolescence: Cultural and gender invariance. European Psychologist. 16 (4), 278-287.
Nye, Christopher D. & Drasgow, Fritz. 2011. Effect size indices for analyses of measurement equivalence: Understanding the practical importance of differences between groups. Journal Of Applied Psychology. 96 (5), 966-980.
Ogg, J.A., Brinkman, T.M., Dedrick, R.F., & Carlson, J.S. 2010. Factor structure and invariance across gender of the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment Protective Factor Scale. School Psychology Quarterly. 25 (2), 107-118.
Pedhazur, E.J. 1997. Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction 3th edition. Fort Worth: Thompson Learning, Inc.
Raju, N.S., Laffitte, L.J., & Byrne, B.M. 2002. Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87 (3), 517-529.
Reise, S.P., Widaman, K.F., & Pugh, R.H. 1993. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin. 114 (3), 522-566.
Rivera-Medina, C.L., Caraballo J.N., Rodriguez-Cordero, E.R., Bernal, G., &
Davila-Marrero, E. 2010. Factor structure of CES-D and measurement invariance across gender for low income Puerto Ricans in probability sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 78 (3), 398-408.
Salkind, Neil. J. 2007. Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. California:
Sage Publications, Inc.
Sattler, Jerome. M. 1992. Assessment of children: Revised and updated 3th edition. San Diego: Publisher, Inc.
Schinka, J.A. & Velicer, W.F. 2003. Handbook of psychology: Volume 2 research methods in psychology. New Jersey: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
South, S.C. Krueger, R.F. Iacono, W.G. 2009. Factorial invariance of the dyadic adjustment scale across gender. Psychological assessment. 21 (4), 622-628.
Spielberger, Charles. 2002. Encyclopedia of applied psychology. Florida: Elsevier Academic Press.
Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M & Baumgartner, H. 1998. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research. 25 (1), 78-90.
Sternberg, R.J. 2003. Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.