• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Membagikan "PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI"

Copied!
193
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)
(2)

i

(3)
(4)

ii i

(5)

v i

I h c i h w , s i s e h t s i h t t a h t e r a l c e d y lt s e n o h

I havew irtten ,doe sno tcontaint hework n

o it a t o u q e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , e l p o e p r e h t o f o k r o w e h t f o s tr a p r

o s and t he

s e c n e r e f e

r ,a sas cienitifcpapers hould.

, a tr a k a y g o

Y February23rd ,2012

TheWrtier

it k e Y u r a d n a m ir P i w e D a t e d a n A

(6)

v

: o t d e t a c i d e d s i s i s e h t s i h T

r o f t s i r h C s u s e J

e v o l l u f r e d n o w s i H

e

g

a

P

n

o

i

t

a

c

i

d

e

D

d a D d n a m o M d e v o l e B y M

a . k . a o k E r e h t o r B y M

^ _ ^ … r o h e L

v

: o t d e t a c i d e d s i s i s e h t s i h T

r o f t s i r h C s u s e J

e v o l l u f r e d n o w s i H

e

g

a

P

n

o

i

t

a

c

i

d

e

D

d a D d n a m o M d e v o l e B y M

a . k . a o k E r e h t o r B y M

^ _ ^ … r o h e L

v

: o t d e t a c i d e d s i s i s e h t s i h T

r o f t s i r h C s u s e J

e v o l l u f r e d n o w s i H

e

g

a

P

n

o

i

t

a

c

i

d

e

D

d a D d n a m o M d e v o l e B y M

a . k . a o k E r e h t o r B y M

^ _ ^ … r o h e L

(7)
(8)

ii

(9)
(10)

x i

T N E M E G D E L W O N K C

A S

o t e d u ti t a r g t s e t a e r g y m s s e r p x e o t e k il d l u o w I l l a f o t s ri

F TheAlmighty

t s i r h C s u s e

J fo rHi swonderfull ove ,graceandblessingi nmyl fies ot ha t I ifnally .

e c a r g s i H f o e s u a c e b d e n e p p a h t i t a h t d e v e il e b I . s i s e h t s i h t d e h s i n if

g e d u ti t a r g e r e c n i s y

M oest o mysponsor ,ChrisitnaKris ityani ,S.Pd., .M ,

d

P fo rhe rguidance ,correciton ,suggesiton ,suppo tr ,and paitence du irng my .t

n e m h s il p m o c c a s i s e h

t Ialso would thank C .Tutyandari ,S.Pd. ,M. .Pd ,and Chrisitna Lhaksmtia Anandari ,S.Pd. ,Ed .M,f orbeingverykindevaluators . I

o t e d u ti t a r g y m d n e s o s l

a al llecturer so fthe Engilsh Language Educa iton m

a r g o r P y d u t

S fort hei rguidancedu irngmys tudyi nSanataDharmaUniverstiy.

k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w

I Samue lSunu Nugraha ,S.Pd. ,S.H. ,M.Hum ,the e

t acher o fSMABOPKR I2 Yogyakatrafo rhi swliilngnesst o help medoing t he a

tr a k a y g o Y 2 I R K P O B A M S n i h c r a e s e

r and al lteacher sand staff so fSMA I

R K P O

B 2 Yogyakatra.

, s t n e r a p d e v o l e b y m o t d e s s e r d d a e d u ti t a r g t s e p e e d y

M Petru s Tr i

r u p il g n a

P and Theresia Sr iSukarsih ,fo rthei rprayer ,love ,care ,paitence , y m o t s e o g o s l a e d u ti t a r g y M . e m o t n e v i g d a h y e h t e c i v d a d n a , tr o p p u s , n o it n e tt a

, r e h t o r b y l e v o

l Eko a.k.a Lehor a.k.aPlenggong ,fo rhi ssuppor twtih hi sfunny .

s i s e h t s i h t g n i h s i n if g n ir u d e k o

j Ialso t hank myl tilteange lKeysha fo rchee irng .s

y a d y m

(11)

x l

O , y k g n e P

ilena, Anggina ,Han-han ,Resa ,Agnez Fetmuk ,Machan ,Stia ,

a k i

M I thank fo rthe suppo tr ,advice ,firendship, tear ,s laughter ,and al lthe .r

e h t e g o t h g u o r h t d a h e w t a h t s e c n e ir e p x e t s e t a e r

g I also thank to the

d n e i d e m m o

C famliy ,Synergy group members ,and t hebig famliy o fLembaga a

m r a h D a t a n a S a s a h a

B fort hes uppor tdu irngt hi spainfu land itirngproces .s

y m g n ir u d e m d e p l e h d a h o h w e n o y r e v e k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I , y ll a n i F

. y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D a t a n a S n i y d u t s

(12)

i x

S T N E T N O C F O E L B A T

e g a P E

G A P E L T I

T ……….. i S

E G A P L A V O R P P

A …….. .... .. .... .. .... .. ..……….. .. .. ii Y

T I L A N I G I R O S ’ K R O W F O T N E M E T A T

S ……...………... i v

.. E G A P N O I T A C I D E

D ……….. . v

. … … … … … .. .. .. .. .. … … … … T C A R T S B

A ………..………... . vi

K A R T S B

A ………...…….……… vii P

R A B M E

L ERNYATAANPERSETUJUANPUBLIKAS IKARYAI LMIAHUNTUK S

I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E

K ………..………... . viii x i … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C A

i x . .. .. . … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S T N E T N O C F O E L B A T

T S I

L OFFIGURES ……… . x v S

E L B A T F O T S I

L ……….. . xvi P

A F O T S I

L PENDICES ……….. . xvii

R E T P A H

C I:I NTRODUCTION .

A ResearchBackground ………....……….……… 1 .

B ProblemFormulaiton ……….………...……….……… . 3 .

C ProblemLimtiaiton ………...……….……… 4 .

(13)

ii x .

F Deifniitono fTerms ………....……… 5 R

E T P A H

C II :REVIEWOFRELATEDLITERATURE n

o it p ir c s e D l a c it e r o e h T .

A ………...….……….. . 7

l e d o M n g i s e D l a n o it c u rt s n I .

1 ……… . 7

e h T .

2 Nature fo Speaking ………... 1 1

s e c n e g il l e t n I e l p it l u M .

3 ………...……… ... 15 d

e s a B l o o h c S .

3 Curirculum ………. 18 .

B Theoreitca lFramework ………... 21

R E T P A H

C III :METHODOLOGY d

o h t e M h c r a e s e R .

A …………...……….... 2 5 n

o it a m r o f n I d n a h c r a e s e R .

1 Collecitng ………. 2 6 g

n i n n a l P .

2 ……….. 2 6 m

r o F y r a n i m il e r P p o l e v e D .

3 o fProduc t ………... 2 7 e

T d l e i F y r a n i m il e r P .

4 sitng ………... 2 7 v

e R t c u d o r P n i a M .

5 ision ………... 2 7 …

… … … … … … … … … s t n e d n o p s e R h c r a e s e R .

B ……… 2 8

.

C Insrtumentsand DataGathe irngTechniqu es……….. 2 9 D .DataAnalysi sTechniques ………... 3 1 E .Research Procedure ………. 33

R E T P A H

C IV :RESEARCHFINDINGSANDDISCUSSIONS .

A Contentso fMateiral s ………...………... 3 5 .

(14)

ii i x .

2 LearningObjecitves……….... 3 4 .

3 TopicandSubjec tContents ...……… . 64 .

4 LearningExpeirences………..………... 50 .

5 The Presentaiton o fUnti ……… ..… …. 51 4 5 . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. s l a ir e t a M e h t f o n o it p ir c s e D . 6

n g i s e D e h T .

B ingSpeaking Mateiral s………... 54

R E T P A H

C V :CONCLUSIONSANDSUGGESTIONS o

i s u l c n o C .

A ns ………..………. . 62 o

it s e g g u S .

B n s………. 64

… … … S E C N E R E F E

R ……… 76

C I D N E P P

A ES……….. 86

(15)

v i x 1

. 2 e r u g i

(16)

v x

S E L B A T F O T S I L

A f o e e r g e D 1 . 3 e l b a

T greemen t ………...……….. 32 n

e d n o p s e R f o e g a t n e c r e P e h T 2 . 3 e l b a

T ts ’Opinion (Blank )…….…………. . 32 c

i s a B d n a , d r a d n a t S y c n e t e p m o C , s c i p o T 1 . 4 e l b a

T Competence………...… 43

2 . 4 e l b a

T Unti ,sTopics, andTimeAllocaiton……….… 45 3

. 4 e l b a

T Untis ,Topics ,and Subjec tContent s………..… 46 4

. 4 e l b a

T Untis ,Topics, and Indicator s………...…. 4 7 ti

n U h c a E n i s e c n e g il l e t n I e l p it l u M f o n o it p ir c s e D e h T . 1 . 5 e l b a

T .. …… .. ….. 75

(17)

i v x s

e c i d n e p p

A ………...……... 69 A

x i d n e p p A

m o r f n o i s s i m r e P f o r e tt e

L Dina sPendidikan ………... 6 9 f

o r e tt e

L Permission t o Dina sPendidikan ...…….... 7 0 o

t n o i s s i m r e P f o r e tt e

L SMABOPKR I2Yogyaka tra... . 71 B

x i d n e p p A

n I d n a h c r a e s e R f o e ri a n n o it s e u

Q formaiton Collecitng ………... 72 y

r a n i m il e r P f o e ri a n n o it s e u

Q Field Tesitng ………. 76 C

x i d n e p p A

o f n I d n a h c r a e s e R f o t l u s e R e h

T rmaitonCollecitng…………...……… 80 l

e i F y r a n i m il e r P f o t l u s e R e h

T d Tesitng ………...…... 87

D x i d n e p p A

b a ll y

S u s……… . 90 o

s s e

L n Plans ………... .10 1 E

x i d n e p p A

e h

T P irnted Speaking Mateirals ……….. .11 3 F

x i d n e p p A

i u G s ’ r e h c a e

(18)

1

I

R

E

T

P

A

H

C

N

O

I

T

C

U

D

O

R

T

N

I

d e d i v i d s i r e t p a h c s i h T . y d u t s s i h t f o n o it c u d o rt n i e h t s t n e s e r p r e t p a h c s i h T

e h t , n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p e h t , d n u o r g k c a b h c r a e s e r e h t , y l e m a n , s n o it c e s n e v e s o t n i

h c r a e s e r e h t , s ti f e n e b h c r a e s e r e h t , s e v it c e j b o h c r a e s e r e h t , n o it a ti m il m e l b o r p

a , n o it a ti m

il ndde ifniitonoft erms.

.

A ResearchBackground

y a w t n e r e f fi d s a h t n e d u t s y r e v

E s to l earn .Theyhavedfiferen tablitiyt o l earn c t e , l a b r e v , c i g o l , e r u t c i p , c i s u m h g u o r h t l l e w n r a e l n a c m e h t f o e m o S . g n i h t e m o s

(Armsrtong ,1994). Student sshow tha tthey are good at some subjects ,no tin al l n

e v E . s t c e j b u

s student swho are very clever and really good a tmos to fal lsubjects , .

t a t s e b e h t t a h t s t c e j b u s r a l u c it r a p e v a h l li t s y e h

t I ti sbecause each studen tha s s

e m o S . s e c n e g il l e t n i t n e r e f fi

d tudent sare good at math ;some student sare good at fi

d d a h r e n d r a G d r a w o H . r D . c t e , e g a u g n a l , tr o p s , c i s u

m ferenitated seven

T . s e c n e g il l e t n

i heyare1)l ogica/lmathemaitcal ,2 )visua/ls paital ,3 )body/kinestheitc , n

a , l a n o s r e p a rt n i ) 6 , l a n o s r e p r e t n i ) 5 , c i m h t y h r/ l a c i s u m )

4 d 7 )verbal /language

: 0 0 0 2 , n a m e e r F

( 159). Tha ti swhy a teache rmus tknow tha tthei rstudent shave

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

(19)
(20)

3

(21)

.

C ProblemLimtia iton

y d u t s e h

T i s ilmtied i n designing a se to fspeaking mate irals based on mulitple e

c n e g il l e t n

i s for t enth grade student so fSMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta .The mate irals e

c n e g il l e t n i e l p it l u m f o y r o e h t e h t n o d e s a b d e n g i s e d e b l li

w s.I taimst o i mprovet he

s y ti li b a g n i k a e p s d n a y r e t s a m ’ s t n e d u t

s ot hatt heycancommunicatei n Engilshwel.l

.

D ResearchObjec itves

e v it c e j b o e n o s e t a r o b a l e y d u t s s i h

T .Theobjecitvei sasf ollow.

g n i k a e p s t n e s e r p o

T mate iralsbasedonmulitplei ntelilgences.

.

E ResearchBeneftis

f o s t n e d u t s e h t r o f s ti f e n e b e t u b ir t n o c o t d e t c e p x e s i y d u t s s i h

T SMABOPKRI

2 Yogyakarta,t heEngilsht eache ro fSMABOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta ,andt her esearcher . w

o l e b d e b ir c s e d e r a s ti f e n e b e h

T .

.

1 Fort hes tudent so fSMABOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta n

g i s e d e h

T mate irals i s expected to help the student s in learning Engilsh , t i t a h t d e p o h s i tI . ll i k s g n i k a e p s ri e h t e v o r p m i n a c y e h t t a h t o s , g n i k a e p s y ll a i c e p s e

(22)

5

.

2 Fort het eache ro fSMABOPKR 2 I Yogyakarta n

g i s e d e h

T mate irals can be an atlernaitve fo rEngilsh teache rto suppor tthei r g

n i h c a e

t mate irals. .

3 Fort her esearcher

g n i k a e p s t u o b a n o it a m r o f n i e r o m e v i g n a c y d u t s s i h

T mate iralsbased on mulitple

e c n e g il l e t n

i s.

.

F De ifni itono fTe s rm

s m r e t e h T . y d u t s e h t f o s m r e t t n a tr o p m i f o n o it i n if e d e h t s e d i v o r p y d u t s s i h T

e c n e g il l e t n i e l p it l u M e r a d e n if e d e b d l u o w t a h

t s andt enthgrades tudent .s 1 .Speaking

y e v n o c o t m e t s y s a s a e g a u g n a l e c it c a r p o t y ti li b a e h t s i y ti li b a g n i k a e p S

e h t s e c u d o r p r e k a e p s e h t , s s e c o r p g n i k a e p s e h t n I . ) 2 9 2 : 8 8 9 1 , n i a t s a G ( g n i n a e m

.) 9 5 : 9 7 9 1 , n o s w o d d i W ( ti e v i e c e r r e r a e h e h t d n a e g a s s e m

2 . Mul itpleI ntelilgences

g il l e t n I e l p it l u

M ence s were made by Dr . Howard Gardner . Mulitple h

c i h w d o h t e m a s i e c n e g il l e t n

I determined the students’ i ntelilgence t o ifnd out the o

t g n i d r o c c A . s h t g n e rt s ’ s t n e d u t

s Howard Gardne rintelilgence i s“the capactiy to n

i d e u l a v e r a t a h t s t c u d o r p n o i h s a f o t r o s m e l b o r p e v l o

s oneo rmorecutlura lsetitng”

. ) 9 8 9 1 , h c t a H & r e n d r a G

( There are seven intelilgence sproposed by Gardner .1 ) rt

s b a e e s o t , y l e v it c e f f e s r e b m u n e s u o t y ti li b a e h t :l a c it a m e h t a m /l a c i g o

L ac tpatterns ,

, t n e m n o ri v n e e h t n i fl e s e n o t n e ir o o t y ti li b a e h t :l a it a p s /l a u s i V ) 2 ; ll e w n o s a e r o t d n a

(23)
(24)

7

I

I

R

E

T

P

A

H

C

E

R

U

T

A

R

E

T

I

L

D

E

T

A

L

E

R

F

O

W

E

I

V

E

R

s i t n i o p t s ri f e h T . r e t p a h c s i h t n i d e s s u c s i d s t n i o p r o j a m o w t e r a e r e h T

s i t n i o p d n o c e s e h t d n a y d u t s e h t f o s e ir o e h t o t d e t a l e r n o it p ir c s e D l a c it e r o e h T

e h t g n i n g i s e d n i e n il e d i u g e h t s a n o it p ir c s e D k r o w e m a r

F mate irals.

.

A Theore itca lDescrip iton

a p s i h

T r twli ldiscus ssome main point sin thi sstudy .They are insrtucitona l m

n g i s e

d odels , The nature o f speaking , mulitple intelilgence , and tenth grade .s

t n e d u t s

.

1 Instruc itona lDesignModels

s s e c o r p e h t “ s i n g i s e d l a n o it c u rt s n i ,) 7 : 7 7 9 1 ( p m e K o t g n i d r o c c

A o fsystemaitc

a s t e s s d e e n d n a s m e l b o r p l a n o it c u rt s n i e n i m a x e o t y a w a s e h s il b a t s e t a h t g n i n n a l p

s t n i o p n i a m e e r h t e r a e r e h T . ” s tl u s e r e h t e t a u l a v e n e h t d n a m e h t g n i v l o s r o f e r u d e c o r p

, d o h t e m , s e v it c e j b o e r a y e h T . ) 8 : 7 7 9 1 ( p m e K y b d e s o p o r p n g i s e d e h t n

i and

a v

e luaiton .Objecitve srelated to wha tshould be learn tby the students .Method o

t d e t a l e

r wha tprocedure sand resource swli lwork best t o reach t he desrie l earning

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

(25)
(26)

9

(27)

g n i h c a e

t -learning acitviite s include the teacher’ s acitviite s and the students ’ .

s e it i v it c

a The t eacher’ sacitviitesi nclude whatt eache rshould doi n t eachingsuch e

h t t n e s e r p s

a mate irals ,explain some i mpo trant t erms ,give clear i nsrtuciton ,o r n

o o s d n a s e it i v it c a ’ s t n e d u t s e h t e z i n a g r

o (1977 :55) .The students ’acitviite s .

k r o w p u o r g r o l a u d i v i d n i e h t n i k s a t e h t g n i o d e d u l c n i .

7 Choosesomesuppor tservice ssucha sbudget ,equipmen,tf aciilitest omaintaint he .

n g i s e d

. n g i s e d e h t n i a t n i a m n a c h c i h w s e c i v r e s t r o p p u s h c i h w s e n i m r e t e d t

I There are

g n i n g i s e d n i d e d e e n e r a t a h t s t n e m e l e y n a

m a se to fmate irals .These suppor t .

) 4 8 : 7 7 9 1 ( l e n n o s r e p d n a , s t n e m p i u q e , s e it il i c a f ,s d n u f e d u l c n i s e c i v r e s .

8 Evaluate the students ’accompilshmen tto do revision and reevaluaiton o fthe d

r o n i n g i s e

d ert o makei mprovement . tI i sused t o gett o knowhow t he students ’ .

d e r u s a e m e b l li w k r o

w A tthe end o fthe teaching-learning acitviites ,teache r e h t g n it a u l a v e t a h t s y a s p m e K . s e m o c t u o g n i n r a e l e h t w o n k o t n o it a u l a v e n a s e k a m

s s e c e n s i g n i n r a e l ’ s t n e d u t

s aryi nordert oknowhowf art hel earner shaveachieved .)

(28)

1 1

e r u g i

F 2.1 :Kemp’ smodel( Kemp ,1997:9)

.

2 TheNatureo fSpeaking

’ n a n u N n i d e t a t s s a e l a Y d n a n w o r B o t g n i d r o c c

A sbook ( 1989:27,) t here are h c i h w n o it c n u f l a n o it c a s n a rt e h t s i t s ri f e h T . g n i k a e p s n i s n o it c n u f e g a u g n a l c i s a b o w t

l a n o it c a r e t n i e h t s i d n o c e s e h T . n o it a m r o f n i f o r e f s n a rt e h t h ti w d e n r e c n o c y li r a m ir p

p s f o h c e e p s f o e s o p r u p y r a m ir p e h t h c i h w n i , n o it c n u

f eech i sthe maintenance o f

,l a o G

,s c i p o T

l a r e n e G

s e s o p r u p

s ’ r e n r a e L

s ir e t c a r a h

C

-s c it

g n i n r a e L

s e v it c e j b O

t c e j b u S

t n e t n o C

e r P -

t n e m s s e s s A /

g n i h c a e T

g n i n r a e l

s e it i v it c A t r o p p u S

e c i v r e S

n o it a u l a v E

e s i v e R

(29)

.s p i h s n o it a l e r l a i c o

s According to Nunan (1989:26) ,spoken language consist so f a n e tf o s i e r e h T . s n o it a i c n u n o r p f o e g n a r a n i , s e c n a r e tt u y r a t n e m g a r f n e tf o , tr o h s

t o n a d n a r e k a e p s e n o n e e w t e b p a lr e v o d n a n o it it e p e r f o l a e d t a e r

g h e .r

1 .

2 TeachingSpeaking

o t s t n e d u t s e h t e l b a n e o t s i m o o r s s a l c e h t n i g n i k a e p s g n i h c a e t f o l a o g e h T

i h c a e b l li w t I . e c n e t e p m o c n o it a c i n u m m o c e h t e v e i h c

a eved fi t he t eache rprovide s

e v it a c i n u m m o C n o d e s a B . s s a l c e h t e g a n a m o t e r u d e c o r p d n a s e u q i n h c e t e v it c e f f e

e d i v o r p t s u m r e h c a e t , g n i k a e p s g n i h c a e t n i , h c a o r p p a ) T L C ( g n i h c a e T e g a u g n a L

e t a ir p o r p p

a mateiral sandkind so fclassroomacitviitest ha tcanbeusedast hebasico f k

s a t , k r o w p u o r g s a h c u s , y g o l o d o h t e m e v it a c i n u m m o c

a -work ,and i nformaiton gap

. ) 3 7 1 : 1 0 0 2 , s r e g o R d n a s d r a h c i R ( s e it i v it c a

o t d e s u e b n a c t a h t s r e g o R d n a s d r a h c i R y b d e s o p o r p e l p i c n ir p e m o s e r a e r e h T

g n i h c a e t tr o p p u

s -learningacitvtiyins peakingclas .s

.

1 Learnersl earnal anguaget hroughusing tit ocommunicate. .

2 Authen itc and meaningfu l communicaiton should be the goa l o f classroom .s

e it i v it c a .

3 Fluencyi sani mpo tran tdimensiono fcommunicaiton. .

4 Communicaitoni nvolvedt hei ntegraitono fdfiferentl anguages kill .s .

(30)

3

(31)
(32)

5

(33)
(34)

7 1

.

2 The parent sand the communtiy involvemen tmay increase .Acitviite sinvolving .s

s e c o r p g n i n r a e l e h t o t n i y ti n u m m o c e h t f o r e b m e m g n ir b p i h s e c it n e r p p a .

3 Student sw li lbeable t o demonsrtate and share t hei rsrtengths .Buliding srtength s m

e h t t n e d u t s a s e v i

g oitvaiton to be a "speciails.t "Thi scan in turn lead to fl

e s d e s a e r c n

i -esteem . .

4 When you "teach fo r understanding, " you r student s accumulate posiitve . e fi l n i m e l b o r p n o it u l o s g n it a e r c r o f y ti li b a p a c e h t d n a s e c n e ir e p x e l a n o it a c u d e

2 . d i v a D , g r u b n r o h T

( 004 .Ret irevedf rom wwwt.hi treen.org ,access on September 9

0 0 2 , 3

2 ).

.

B Learningac itvi itest os uppor tmul itplei ntelilgencei nl earningEngilsh.

n a m e e r F n e s r a L a n a i D y b d e ti c s a ) 6 9 9 1 ( g n o rt s m A d n a n o s it s ir h C

g n i n r a e l n i s e c n e g il l e t n I e l p it l u M e h t t r o p p u s o t s e it i v it c a e b ir c s e d ) 0 7 1 : 0 0 0 2 (

. h s il g n E

.

1 LinguisitcIntelilgence .Therearesomemate iralsandacitviite swhichcani mprove ll

a m s , s e r u t c e l s a h c u s s e s u r e h c a e t e h T . e c n e g il l e t n i c it s i u g n il e h

t - and large

t n e d u t s , s k o o b g n i k l a t r o s e tt e s s a c o t g n i n e t s il , s e m a g d r o w , s n o i s s u c s i d p u o r g

, g n il l e t y r o t s ,s e h c e e p

s debates ,memo irzing ,andusingwordprocesso .r .

2 Logic -al Mathemaitca l Intelilgence .There are some acitviite ssuch a sscience o t p l e h n a c s n r e tt a p g n i d n if d n a s s e h c g n i y a l p , s e m a g , r e b m u n , e l z z u p , t n e m ir e p x e

l a c i g o l e v o r p m

i -mathemaitcali ntelilgence.

(35)
(36)

9 1

e h t n i d e t a t s s

A Standa rNasiona lPendidikan( SNPpasa l1 ,aya t15 ,) School r

o m u l u c ir r u C d e s a

B Kurikulum Tingka tSatuan Pendidikan (KTSP )i soperaitona l ,

d e g n a r r a s i h c i h w m u l u c ir r u

c developed ,and i mplemented by each educaiton l evel o

t g n ir r e f e

r Competency standard and Basic Competence which are developed by r

a d n a t S n a d a

B Nasiona lPendidikan(Mulyana ;2007) .

) P S T K ( n a k i d i d n e P n a u t a S t a k g n i T m u l u k i r u

K i sarranged and developed

n o d e s a

b Undang-Undang20Tahun2003abou tNaitona lEducaitonSystempasa l36 , a

d , 1 t a y

a n2 ,asf ollow.

.

1 Cur irculumdevelopmenti scariredou tbyr efer irngt onaitona leducaiton

standardt or eacht hepurposeo fnaitona leducaiton.

.

2 Cur irculumi neveryl eve lofs tudyi sdevelopedbyconside irngt hep irnciple

o fdiversi ifcaitono fSatuanPendidikan ,region ,andl earner .s

o w t e r a e r e h

T Competencystandard so fSpeakingskli loft enthgradestudent s s

i t s ri f e h T . e n o r e t s e m e s n

i to r evea lmeaningi n t he rtansacitona land i nterpersona l t

x e t n o c e h t n i n o it a s r e v n o

c o fdaliyl fie.Whliet heBasicCompetenceareasf ollow.

.

a To revea lmeaning in forma lo rinforma l rtansacitona l t(o ge tthing sdone )and g n i s u y b e l b a t p e c c a d n a , y lt n e u lf , y l e t a r u c c a n o it a s r e v n o c ) e z il a i c o s ( l a n o s r e p r e t n i

c e h t n i e g a u g n a l l a b r e v e l p m i

s ontex to fdaliy lfie and including :inrtoduciton ,

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

(37)

n o it a ti v n i/ r e f f o /t s e u q e r g n it p e c c a , g n it r a p / g n it e e

m , accepitng appointment , and

.t n e m t n i o p p a g n il l e c n a c

.

b To revea lmeaning in forma lo rinforma l rtansacitona l t(o ge tthing sdone )and a

i c o s ( l a n o s r e p r e t n

i ilze )conversaiton accurately , lfuenlty ,and acceptable by using a

u g n a l l a b r e v e l p m i

s ge in the contex t o f daliy lfie , including : Expression o f .

n o it c u rt s n i g n i v i g d n a , y h t a p m y s g n i w o h s , n o it n e tt a g n i w o h s ,s s e n i p p a h

d n o c e s e h

T Competency standard t is o r evea lmeaningi n t hesho tr f uncitona l e h t n i e r u d e c o r p d n a e v it a r r a n , t n u o c e r e l p m i s f o m r o f e h t n i g o l o n o m d n a t x e t

. e fi l y li a d f o t x e t n o

c Whliet heBasicCompetenceareasf ollow.

.

a To revea lmeaning in the form o fforma land informa lshor tfuncitona ltex t n i e g a u g n a l l a b r e v g n i s u y b ) c t e , n o it a ti v n i ,t n e m e s it r e v d a , t n e m e c n u o n n a : e l p m a x e (

. e fi l y li a d f o t x e t n o c e h t

.

b To revea lmeaning in simple monolog tex tby using va irou skind o fverba l m r o f e h t n i e fi l y li a d f o t x e t n o c e h t n i e l b a t p e c c a d n a , y lt n e u lf , y l e t a r u c c a e g a u g n a l

.t x e t e r u d e c o r p d n a , e v it a r r a n , t n u o c e r :f o

s e v it c e j b O 1 . 4

f o s e v it c e j b o r o j a m e e r h t e r a e r e h

T Engilsh language learning based on l

o o h c

S -Based Cur irculum . tIi sexpected t ha ta tferl earningEngilsh student sare able :

(38)

1 2

.

1 developl anguagecompetencei nboths pokenandw irttent oachieve

informaitonall tieracy.

.

2 reailzet her oleo fEngilshi nglobailzaitonera.

.

3 recognizet heconnecitonbetweenl anguageandcutlure.

.

B Theore itca lFramework

f o t e s a g n i n g i s e d n i d e il p p a e r e w s p e t s e m o

S mate iralsfort eachingspeaking A

M S f o s t n e d u t s e d a r g h t n e t r o f e c n e g il l e t n I e l p it l u M n o d e s a

b BOPKRI II

e h T . a tr a k a y g o

Y mate iralsi sdesignedbasedont het eachers ’andt hes tudents ’need .s e

h t g n i n g i s e d n

I mate irals ,the wrtie radapted Kemp’ sInsrtucitona lDesign s i l e d o M n g i s e D l a n o it c u rt s n I s i h t g n i s o o h c n i n o s a e r e h T . y d u t s s i h t n i l e d o M

d n a , d o h t e m , s e v it c e j b o : s t n i o p n i a m e e r h t n i g n i z i s a h p m e l e d o M s i h t e s u a c e b

. w o l e b d e s s u c s i d e b d l u o w p e t s h c a E . n o it a u l a v e

.

1 Diagnosi so fNeeds

, p e t s s i h t n

I two o fKemp’ sID mode lmodel s (step 2 and step 5 )are .

d e y o l p m

e Indesigningt hes peakingmate irals ,tii snecessaryt ohavet hei nformaiton .

e g d e l w o n k f o l e v e l ri e h t d n a s c it s ir e t c a r a h c ’ s t n e d u t s e h t t u o b a

e h t g n i n g i s e d n i , s u h

T mate irals ,the wrtie rsta tr swtih conducitng a survey .

h s il g n E g n i n r a e l n i s t s e r e t n i d n a s d e e n ’ s t n e d u t s e h t t u o b

a In Kemp’ s if tfhstep said

(39)

e r p g n it c u d n o c y b d e n i a tt a s i e g d e l w o n k f o l e v e l ’ s t n e d u t s e h t t a h

t -assessment ,buti n

t a o t d e t c u d n o c s a w y e v r u s y d u t s s i h

t tain the students ’leve lo fknowledge .The f

o s t n e d u t s e d a r g h t n e t g n i y o l p m e y b d e t c u d n o c s a w y e v r u

s SMA BOPKR I 2

a t r a k a y g o

Y andanEngilsht eacher .TheEngilsht eache rwa schosenbecauseallt enth .

m i h y b t h g u a t e r e w s e s s a l c e d a r g

.

2 SpecfiyingLearningObjecitves ’

p m e

K sfris tstep i semployed in thi sstep .The main focu so fthi sstep i s n a c s e v it c e j b o g n i n r a e l e h T . ti n u h c a e r o f s c i p o t d n a s e v it c e j b o g n i n r a e l e h t g n i d i c e d

e h t n i d n u o f e

b Competency standard and Basic Competence or Kurikulum Tingka t 6

0 0 2 ) P S T K ( n a k i d i d n e P n a u t a

S andt hecurirculumo fSMABOPKR I2Yogyaka tra. e

r a p e t s s i h t f o t l u s e r e h

T Competencystandard ,Basic Competence, t opic sfo reach .t

i n u h c a e r o f n o it a c o ll a e m it d n a , ti n u

.

3 Selecitono fContent

. d e y o l p m e e r a h tr u o f d n a d ri h t s ’ p m e K , p e t s s i h t n

I The frist t hing t o do i n

s i t n e t n o c f o n o it c e l e s , s r o t a c i d n i e h t g n i v a h r e tf A . s r o t a c i d n i e h t g n i d i c e d s i p e t s s i h t

e h t n o d e s a b t n e t n o c f o n o it c e l e s e h T . d e t c u d n o

c resul t o f Need Diagnosis ,

t s y c n e t e p m o

C andard ,and Basic Competence so tha ti twli lbe sutiable wtih the h

T . s t s e r e t n i d n a s d e e n ’ s t n e d u t

s er esul toft hi ssteparesubjec tconten tandindicator s .t

(40)

3

(41)

a m r a h D a t a n a S f o m a r g o r P y d u t S n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a l h s il g n E f o s r e r u t c e l o w t e r a

f o r e h c a e t h s il g n E e n o d n a y ti s r e v i n

U SMABOPKR I2Yogyakarta. tIi sconductedi n r e tt e b n i a t b o o t s t n e d n o p s e r e h t m o r f s k c a b d e e f d n a s n o it s e g g u s n i a g o t r e d r o

g n i k a e p

s mateiralsdegined. .

7 Fina lProduc tRevision

g n i k a e p s r e tt e b n i a t b o o t d e t c u d n o c n o i s i v e r , p e t s s i h t n

I mate irals design .

’ p m e

K seigh tstepsuggestsr evisionand i mprovement sbased ont hesugges iton sand s k c a b d e e f d n a s n o it s e g g u s e h t g n i n i a g r e tf A . p e t s s u o i v e r p e h t m o r f n i a g s k c a b d e e f

e s i v e r r e ti r w e h t ,s t n e d n o p s e r e h t m o r

(42)

5 & R

(43)
(44)

7 2

.

3 Developpreilminaryf ormo fproduct

l a n o it c u rt s n i f o n o it a r a p e r p e h t d e d u l c n i t

I mate irals , handbooks , and

u o h s t a h t e l p i c n ir p t n a tr o p m i n A . e s i v e d n o it a u l a v

e ldbe observedi ndevelopingt he o t s a o s t c u d o r p e h t s e r u t c u rt s o t s i t c u d o r p l a n o it a c u d e n a f o m r o f y r a n i m il e r p

if e h t m o r f e l b i s s o p s a k c a b d e e f h c u m s a g n i n i a t b o t i m r e

p eldt est .Thedatagathered

e h t n g i s e d o t d e s

u mate irals and t he feedback gathered from t he Preilminary Field n

g i s e d e h t p o l e v e d o t d e s u s a w g n it s e

T mate irals.

.

4 Preilminary ifeldt es itng

f o s r e h c a e t h s il g n E e v i F . e ri a n n o it s e u q d n a w e i v r e t n i d e d u l c n i t

I SMA

I R K P O

B 2 Yogyakarta and two Engilsh Educaiton Study Program lecturers e

t a u l a v

e d the designed mate irals . I t wa sconducted to gain the feedback and e

h t o t s n o it s e g g u

s mate irals ed signed .The feedback and suggesiton su d se to revise d

e n g i s e d e h t e v o r p m i d n

a mate irals .

.

5 Mainproduc trevision

d e n g i s e d e h t f o n o i s i v e r e h

T mate irals would be conducted based on the f

o s r e h c a e t h s il g n E e v if m o r f n o it s e g g u s d n a , s t n e m m o c , k c a b d e e

f SMA BOPKRI 2

a t r a k a y g o

Y and two lecturer so fEngilsh Language Educaiton Study Program of .

y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D a t a n a S

(45)

.

B ResearchPar itcipants

r e h

T e were two group so fparitcipants in thi sstudy to gain the data from h

t n e t 0 8 f o d e t s i s n o c p u o r g t s ri f e h T . s e v it c e p s r e p t n e r e f fi

d grade student so fSMA

2 I R K P O

B Yogyakarta .Theyr epresentedal loft enth gradestudentsi nsemeste rone . e

t t h g i e e r e w e r e h

T nthgradeclasses ,andt heparitcipant swerechosenr andomly.

e h

T second group consisted o fone Engilsh teache ro fSMA BOPKR I2 .

a t r a k a y g o

Y TheEngilsh t eache rwas chosenbecause t hey knewt he characte irsitc s s

t n e d u t s e h t f o d n u o r g k c a b e h t d n

a and t here i sonly one t eache rwho t aught t enth s

t n e d u t s e d a r

g .I taimed to gain feedback ,opinions ,o rsuggesiton sto design the s

l a ir e t a

m .Theother r espondent swere t wol ecturer so fEngilsh Language Educaiton o

t n e s o h c e r e w s r e r u t c e l e h T . m a r g o r P y d u t

S gain feedback , opinions , o r

n g i s e d e h t t u o b a s n o it s e g g u

s mate irals .

t s ri f e h t , g n it c e ll o C n o it a m r o f n I d n a h c r a e s e R e h t n

I groupoft he paritcipants

e v l o v n i s a

w d to gain the data to design the mate irals .From the second group o f t

n a p i c it r a

p s ,only Engilsh teache ro fSMA BOPKR I2 Yogyakarta were involved .s

t n e d u t s e h t f o d n u o r g k c a b e h t d n a c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t w e n k y e h t e s u a c e b

g n it s e T d l e i F y r a n i m il e r P e h t n

I ,only the second group o fthe paritcipant s e

r e w y e h t , d e v l o v n i s a

w eo En ngilsht eache ro fSMABOPKR I2Yogyaka traandt wo , k c a b d e e f n i a g o t d e m i a t I . m a r g o r P y d u t S n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E f o s r e r u t c e l

e h t t u o b a s n o it s e g g u s d n a , s n o i n i p

(46)

9 2

.

C InstrumentsandDataGatheringTechnique

d n a h c r a e s e R n i a t a d e h t n i a t b o o t , y d u t s s i h t n

I informaiton collecitng and

s a h c u s s t n e m u rt s n i h c r a e s e r e m o s d e y o l p m e r e ti r w e h t , g n it s e t d l e if y r a n i m il e r p

s a w t n e m u rt s n i h c r a e s e r t s ri f e h T . e ri a n n o it s e u q d n a , w e i v r e t n i , n o it a v r e s b o

e s b

o rvaiton. “Observaiton wa sa technique tha tcan be used when data collected k c o c n a H ( ” e t a d il a v o t t l u c if fi d s i r o e u l a v d e ti m il f o e b n a c s n a e m r e h t o h g u o r h

t ,

2 1 : 8 9 9

1 -13) .I taimed to ge tto know the classroom stiuaiton and the students ’ .

c it s ir e t c a r a h

c Writtendescripitonmethodwouldbeusedi nt hi sstudyt oobservet he .

m o o r s s a l

c Classroom stiuaiton covered the avaliablitiy o fthe teaching media , s

l a ir e t a

m ,clas ssize ,etc .The students ’characte irsitc covered age ,gende ,r i nterest , .

e g d e l w o n k d n u o r g k c a b d n a

T he second insrtumen ttha twa sused to obtain the data wa s interview . r

o , d e r u t c u rt s i m e s , d e r u t c u rt s y l h g i h e b d l u o c w e i v r e t n

I unsrtuctured . Sem i

w e i v r e t n i d e r u t c u rt

s wa sused in thi sstudy .“Sem isrtucture interview involved a n

e p o f o s e ir e

s -ended quesiton basedon t het opic areat he r esearche rwantst o cover” 9

: 8 9 9 1 , k c o c n a H

( -10 .)I taimed t ogaindetalii nformaitonf romt her espondents .The r

w tie rchose one Engilsh t eacher in SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta to be i nterviewed . e h t m o r f n o it a m r o f n i t n a tr o p m i e m o s n i a t b o o t d e t c u d n o c s a w w e i v r e t n i s i h T

e h t f o s d e e n e h t d e d u l c n i n o it a m r o f n i t n a tr o p m i e h T . s r e h c a e

t mate irals,t het eaching

g n i h c a e t g n it s e r e t n i e h t d n a , d e s u y ll a u s u y e h t t a h t d o h t e

m -learning acitviite stha t

a t a d e h T . d e k il y e h

(47)
(48)

1 3

f o s t n e d u t s e h t f o c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h

t SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta. Thrid, t he wrtie r r

e h c a e t h s il g n E e n o d e w e i v r e t n

i fo SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta .I taimed t o obtain e

h t f o s d e e n e h

t mate irals,t he t eachingmethod,andt he acitviites .Fourth,t he wrtie r f

o s t n e d u t s e h t o t s e ri a n n o it s e u q d e t u b ir t s i

d SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta to ifnd ou t e

h

t students ’needs ,the acitviite stha tthey ilked ,and the topic tha tthey ilked .I t e

h t g n i n g i s e d n i r e ti r w e h t d e p l e

h mate iralsfort hes tudents .

h s il g n E e v if o t d e t u b ir t s i d s a w e ri a n n o it s e u q , g n it s e T d l e i F y r a n i m il e r P e h t n I

f o s r e h c a e

t SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta andt wo Engilsh LanguageEducaiton Study t s e g g u s d n a , s t n e m m o c , k c a b d e e f e h t n i a g o t d e t c u d n o c s a w t I .s r e r u t c e l m a r g o r

P ion s

d e n g i s e d e h t p o l e v e d d n a e s i v e r o t d e s u e b d l u o w t a h

t mate irals.

.

D DataAnalysi sTechnique

t s s i h t n

I udy , the data gathered from closed-ended and open-ended s

a w a t a d e h T . e ri a n n o it s e u

q presented in the form o fpercentage and narraitve t

p ir c s e

d i on.

m o r f d e r e h t a g a t a d e h

T the open-ended quesitonnarie w are analyzed r

w e h T . y l e v it p ir c s e

d tie rwould analyze the resul to f open-ended quesitonnarie by o t n i n o i s u l c n o c e h t e d a m d n a n o it s e u q h c a e n o s r e w s n a e h t r o f n o i s u l c n o c g n i k a m

h t a g a t a d e h T . a e d i n i a m e n

o ered from t he clo -se ended quesitonnarie was presented f

o m r o f e h t n

i percentage .Ary ,Jacobs ,andRazavieh( 1990 :235 )statedt hati nLiker t e v if s e s u e ri a n n o it s e u q e h t f o s t n e m e t a t s ’ s t n e d n o p s e r e h t f o t n e m g d u j e h t , m e ti e l a c s

. t n e m e e r g a f o s e e r g e

d Theyar emenitonedbelow.

(49)

e l b a

T .3 1. Degree so fAgreement

e r o c

S Explana iton

1 2 3 4 5

Srtonglydisagreewtiht hes tatement t n e m e t a t s e h t h ti w e e r g a s i D

t n e m e t a t s e h t h ti w d e d i c e d n U

t n e m e t a t s e h t h ti w e e r g A

t n e m e t a t s e h t h ti w e e r g a y l g n o rt S

n

I analyzing thedatagathered from t he close-ended quesitonnarie,t he wrtie r e

g a t n e c r e p d e s

u . I tusedt oanalyzer espondents ’opinionaboutt hemate irals ,content , n

e p o e h t r o F . s e it i v it c a g n i n r a e l d n

a -endedquesiton ,st her esul twa spresentedi n t he it

a r r a n f o m r o

f vedescirpitve.

e l b a

T .3 2. ThePercentageo fRespondents ’Opinion

o

N Respondents ’Opinion Percentage(%)

t e d i c e d o t d e r e h t a g a t a d e h t f o s tl u s e r e h t d e s u r e ti r w e h

T he t opics da n how

(50)

3

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

(51)

d e n g i s e d e h t t u o b a s n o it s e g g u s d n a , s t n e m m o

c mate irals .Thedata gainedwould be d

e n g i s e d e h t p o l e v e d d n a e s i v e r o t d e s

(52)

5 3

V

I

R

E

T

P

A

H

C

S

N

O

I

S

S

U

C

S

I

D

D

N

A

S

G

N

I

D

N

I

F

H

C

R

A

E

S

E

R

t n e s e r p r e t p a h c s i h

T s ther esutl sanddiscussion oft hestepsi n designinga se t g

n i k a e p s f

o mate iralsbasedonmul itplei ntelilgences fort enthgrades tudent so fSMA y

g o Y 2 I R K P O

B aka tra .Thi schapte ranswer sa quesiton elaborated i n t he problem o

it a l u m r o

f n .Therefore, t hi schapter i sdivided into t wo pa trs .The fris tpar texplain g

n i k a e p s f o t e s a g n i n g i s e d f o s s e c o r p e h

t mate irals based on mulitple intelilgences , g

n i k a e p s d e n g i s e d e h t s t n e s e r p t r a p d n o c e s e h t e li h

w mate irals.

.

A Content soft heMaterials

w o h s t n e s e r p t r a p s i h

T a se t o f speaking mate irals based on Mulitple S

f o s t n e d u t s e d a r g h t n e t r o f e c n e g il l e t n

I MA BOPKR I2 Yogyaka tra designed. In g

n i k a e p s e h t g n i p o l e v e

d mate irals, t hi sstudy employed Research and Developmen t B

y b d e s o p o r p d o h t e m ) D & R

( org and Gall .There were ifve step sconducted in e

h t g n i n g i s e

d mate irals .Those step swere used t o answer the fris tquesiton stated i n .

w o ll o f s a e r a p e t s h c a e f o s li a t e d e h T . n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p e h t

.

1 Students ’Need sandCharacteris itc

l a n o it c u rt s n i f o s e ir o e h t d e t c e ll o c r e ti r w e h t ,s w e i v e r e r u t a r e ti l g n it c u d n o c y B

s d o h t e m g n i h c a e t s ti d n a g n i k a e p s f o e r u t a n e h t , s l e d o m n g i s e

d ,the theo ire so f

(53)
(54)

7 3

, t s il k c e h c h tr u o

f mos to fthe student schose “undecided” ,whlie 18.75% o fthe .

t n e m ir e p x e e c n e i c s e k il t o n d i d y e h t t a h t d e t a t s s t n e d u t s

t s il k c e h

C s numbe r ifve to seven were related to musica lintelilgence .From f

o % 5 . 7 6 , e v if r e b m u n t s il k c e h

c thestudent sstatedt hatt heyr eally ilkedmusic .From e r e h t fi d a s y r e v e b d l u o w y e h t t a h t d e t a t s s t n e d u t s e h t f o % 5 . 7 6 , x i s r e b m u n t s il k c e h c

. d lr o w s i h t n i c i s u m o n s a

w Fromcheckils tnumbe rseven ,60%oft hestudent sstated d

r a e h e h t g n o s e h t g n a s y e h

t onTVwhliet hey wen tsomewhere . t

s il k c e h

C s numbe reigh tand nine were related to spaita lintelilgence .From e

h

t eighth checkilst ,mos to fthe student schose “undecided” and 18.75% o fthe .

e l z z u p g n i o d t a d o o g e r e w y e h t d e t a t s s t n e d u t

s From t heninth checkilst ,21.25% o f s t n e d u t s e h t f o % 5 y l n o d n a , s p a m g n i d a e r t a d o o g e r e w y e h t d e t a t s s t n e d u t s e h t

. ” e e r g a y l g n o rt s “ e s o h c

s t s il k c e h c h t n e v e l e d n a h t n e t e h

T w ere related to bodliy-kinestheitc .

e c n e g il l e t n

i Fromcheckils tnumbert en ,26.25%oft he student schose“agree”t o t he .

tr o p s t a d o o g e r e w y e h t t a h t t n e m e t a t

s There were 21.25% chose “srtongly agree” , e s o h c % 5 . 2 4 d n a , ” e e r g a s i d y l g n o rt s “ e s o h c % 5 . 2 , ” e e r g a s i d “ e s o h c % 5 . 7

. ” d e d i c e d n u

“ Checkils tnumbe releven revealed t ha t10% of t he student sreally ilke .

g n i c n a

d Only 6.25% o fthe student schose “agree” ,25% “undecided” ,20% chose .

” e e r g a s i d y l g n o rt s “ e s o h c % 0 3 d n a , ” e e r g a s i d

t s il k c e h

C s numbe r twelve and thi treen were related to interpersona l e

r t s il k c e h c h tf l e w t e h t m o r F . e c n e g il l e t n

i vealed t ha t45% oft he student sstated t hey .

d a s t l e f s r e h t o n e h w d a s t l e

f There were 21.25% o fthe student schose “srtongly

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

(55)
(56)

9 3

. t n e m e t a t

s From t hi sdata,i tcould be seen t ha tmore t han hal fof t he student swere .

h s il g n E h ti w g n it s e r e t n i

n r a e l o t d e k il s t n e d u t s e h t r e h t e h w o t d e t a l e r n o it s e u q d n o c e s e h

T speaking

h s il g n

E .There were 27.5% of the student sstated tha tthey did no t ilke speaking t

n e d u t s e h t f o % 5 7 . 3 1 d n a h s il g n

E ssrtongly disagreed t o t he statement .I tcould be r

e b m u n e h t t a h t d e d u l c n o

c s of t he student swho did no t ilke speaking Engilsh were highert hatt henumbe roft hes tudent swho ilkeds peakingEngilsh.

n o it s e u q d ri h t e h t m o r

F , i twa srevealed t ha t33.75% of t he students t hough t .

y s a e t o n s a w t i d n a n u f t o n s a w h s il g n E g n i k a e p s t a h

t Therewereonly1.25% oft he

t a h t d e e r g a y l g n o rt s s t n e d u t

s speaking Engilsh wa sno tfun and no teasy .From s e it l u c if fi d d n u o f s t n e d u t s e h t f o % 5 7 . 8 4 t a h t d e l a e v e r s a w t i ,r u o f r e b m u n n o it s e u q

. g n i k a e p s g n i n r a e l n i

n o it s e u q h tf if e h

T sw a related t o t he media used by t he t eacher .There were s

s t n e d u t s e h t f o % 5 . 7

2 tated tha tthe media used by the teache rwa sgood enough . y

l n

O 6.25%oft hes tudentswhowere srtonglyagreedt ot hes tatement. Fromt hes ixth u

q esiton ,i tcould be seen tha t16.25% o fthe student sare tn o alway sspeaking in h

s il g n

E in the classroom and 18.75% o fthe student ssrtongly agreed that they .

m o o r s s a l c e h t n i h s il g n E n i k a e p s s y a w l

a I twa srevealed t ha tmos tof t he student s .s s a l c h s il g n E d a h y e h t n e h w h s il g n E f o d a e t s n i e g a u g n a l e v it a n r i e h t k a e p s o t d n e t

n e v e s e h

T th quesiton related to thei rhabi tin speaking Engilsh .There were %

0

4 f o et h students stated tt yha the w ere rtyingt os peak Engilsh outside t he

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

(57)

. m o o r s s a l

c I tcould be concluded tha tmos to fthe student swere rtying to pracitce .

m o o r s s a l c e h t e d i s t u o h s il g n E r i e h t

h s il g n E n r a e l o t d e k il s t n e d u t s e h t f o % 5 . 7 3 t a h t d e l a e v e r n o it s e u q h t h g i e e h T

e r e w e r e h T . s e m a g h g u o r h

t 3.75% of t he student ssrtongly agreed to t he statement . h s il g n E n r a e l o t d e k il s t n e d u t s e h t f o t s o m t a h t n e e s e b d l u o c t i ,r e b m u n s i h t m o r F

m a g h g u o r h

t e s .

e h

T ninth quesiton related t o t he acitviite swa sdone by t he student soutside , s e it i v it c a s u o ir a v e r e w e r e h T . ll i k s g n i k a e p s r i e h t e v o r p m i o t m o o r s s a l c e h

t they

g n i s u , h s il g n E n i s m a r g o r p V T r o s e i v o m g n i h c t a w , h s il g n E n i s g n o s g n i g n i s e r e w

,t e n r e t n

i playing game swhich used Engilsh language ,and talking wtih f irend sin .

h s il g n E

e h

T tenthquesitonr elated t ot he dfi ifculitesf oundbyt hestudentsi n l earning .

g n i k a e p

s From t he data, i tcould be concluded t hat t he dfi ifculites t ha tcould be t he d n a , r a m m a r g , y r a l u b a c o v f o k c a l e h t e r e w h s il g n E n r a e l o t m e h t r o f r e ir r a b

. n o it a i c n u n o r p

’ s t n e d u t s e h t t u o d n if o t d e s u e r e w s e ri a n n o it s e u q o w t t r a p f o s tl u s e r e h T

f o d n u o r g k c a

b knowledge , thei r interest , the students ’ dfi ifculite s in learning ,

g n i k a e p

s and thei r habi t in speaking engilsh . The resutl s were used a s the e

h t g n i n g i s e d n i n o it a r e d i s n o

c mate irals to make the sutiable mate irals fo rthe .s

t n e d u t s

d e t c u d n o c s a w w e i v r e t n

(58)

1 4

, t s e r e t n i , s c it s ir e t c a r a h c ’ s t n e d u t s e d a r

g how to moitvate the students ,and also the a

e p s n i y ti li b a ’ s t n e d u t

s kingEngilsh f rom t het eache rpoin to fview.The responden t s

t n e d u t s e h t f o e m o s t a h t d e n o it n e

m were cleve renough ,goodenough ,anddiilgent . d n u o f s e m it e m o s d n a h g u o n e r e v e l c t o n e r e w s t n e d u t s e h t f o e m o s , r e v e w o H

u o c t I . h s il g n E g n i n r a e l n i s e it l u c if fi

d ld be concluded t hat t he studen ts had dfiferen t .s

c it s ir e t c a r a h

c The responden talso stated tha tthe student s were interesitng in e

h c a e t e h t e s u a c e b h s il g n E g n i n r a e

l ralway st ire sto moitvate them .The teache r e

t a v it o

m d t hem by t elilng t hem t hat i n t he future Engilsh would be very usefu lfo r .

w e i v r e t n i b o j a d a h r o b o j a r o f d e il p p a y e h t n e h w y ll a i c e p s e , m e h

t Quesitonnumbe r

e h t t a h t d e t a t s t n e d n o p s e r e h T . h s il g n E g n i k a e p s n i y ti li b a s t n e d u t s e h t o t d e t a l e r r u o f

t n e d u t

s s ’ablitiywass itlli nbeginnerl eve lbecauset heyhaddfiferen tbackground .

e h

T quesitons numbe r ifvet os evenwererelatedt othet eacher’ sdfi ifculitesi n g

n i k a e p s g n i h c a e

t and t he students ’dfi ifculites i n l earningspeaking. The responden t h

t d e t a t

s a tthere were some dfi ifculite sEngilsh in genera lsuch a sdiscipilnary and y e h t s e m it e m o S . y d u t s o t y d a e r t o n e r e w s s a l c e h t o t e m a c s t n e d u t s e m o S . s e s u c o f

n o s s e l e h t o t s u c o f e b o t t l u c if fi d t i d n u o f y e h t d n a e t a l e m a

c s .However ,no tal l

n u e r e w s t n e d u t

s discipilned and could no t be focus . Some student s arleady o

o t s r e d n

u d what t hey had t o do when t hey came t o t he classroom .There were also h

s il g n E d e n r a e l y e h t n e h w s t n e d u t s e h t y b d e c a f s r e ir r a b e m o

s in genera land

g n i k a e p

s from t he t eacher’ spoin to fview .The responden tmenitoned t he students ’ if

fi d n i a

m culitesi n l earning Engilshwerevocabulary ,pronunciaiton,i ntonaiton ,and

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

(59)
(60)

3

(61)
(62)

5

(63)

3 ExpressionHappiness 4 4 ShowingattenitonandSymphaty 4 5 GivingI nsrtuciton 4

6 Announcement 2

7 Recount 4

8 Narraitve 4

9 Procedure 4

l a t o

T 3 4

t c e j b u S d n a s c i p o T .

3 Contents

e m it d n a s e v it c e j b o e h t g n i v a h r e tf a s t n e t n o c e h t d e t c e l e s r e ti r w e h T

w e h t , p e t s s i h t n I .s p e t s s u o i v e r p e h t n i n o it a c o ll

a rtie rselected t het opic and subjec t t

i n u h c a e r o f t n e t n o

c which sw a sutiable wtih t heobjecitve sand t he students ’need s e

r e t n i d n

a s ts . c i p o t e h

T andt hes ubjec tconten twerepresentedi nt he table 34 . . .

3 . 4 e l b a

T Untis ,Topic ,s andSubjec tContents

ti n

U s Topic Subjec tContent 1 Inrtoduciton ,

g n it r a p / g n it e e

m xxEExxpprreessssiioonnoof fi mnerteoditnugciton xExpressiono fparitng

2 Invtiaiton xExpressiono faccepitngani nvtiaiton xExpressionofr efusingani nvtiaiton 3 Expressing

e n i p p a

H ss xxERxesppreosnssieont ooex fhparpepsisnioensso fhappiness 4 ShowingAtten iton

d n

a Sympathy xxEExxpprreessssiioonnooffs s hhoowwiinnggs ayttmenpaitothny 5 GivingI nsrtuciton xExpressiono fgivingi ns rtuciton

xResponseo fgivingi nsrtuciton 6 Announcement xAnnouncementt ext

(64)

7 4

ti n

U s Topic Subjec tContent xSimplepastt ense

8 Narraitve xNarraitvet ext

xKindo fnarraitvet ext xRegula rand riregula rverbs xDriec tandi ndriects peech 9 Procedure xProceduret ext

xImperaitve

xTransiitona lphrase

t x e n e h

T step a tfe rselecitng the subjec tcontent swa sdeciding the learning e

n if e d e r e w s r o t a c i d n i e h T . s r o t a c i d n

i d based on the competency standard ,basic r

f s t n e t n o c t c e j b u s e h t d n a , e c n e t e p m o

c om each unti .The indicator so feach uni to f n

g i s e d e h

t mate irals ew er presentedi nt het able4 . .4

ti n U . 4 . 4 e l b a

T s ,Topics ,andI ndicators

ti n

U Topic Indicators

1 Inrtoduciton , g n it r a p / g n it e e

m  MStueedeitnntg sa1r:eablet oi dent fiyt heexpressiono f . o e d i v e h t n i d e s u g n it r a p / g n it e e m , n o it c u d o rt n i

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset ot heexpression .

g n it r a p / g n it e e m , n o it c u d o rt n i f o

 Student sare able t o make a dialogue by using t he .

g n it r a p / g n it e e m , n o it c u d o rt n i f o n o i s s e r p x e

Mee itng2:

 Student sareablet ouset heexpression e

e m , n o it c u d o rt n

i itng/par itng.

 Student sareablet ogiver esponsest ot he . g n it r a p / g n it e e m , n o it c u d o rt n i f o n o i s s e r p x e

2 Invtiaiton  Mee itng1:

Student sare able to identfiy the expression so f .

n o it a ti v n i n a g n it p e c c a

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset ot heexpression .

n o it a ti v n i n a g n it p e c c a f o

(65)

ti n

U Topic Indicators

 Student s are able to identfiy the expression o f .

n o it a ti v n i d n a g n i s u f e r

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset ot he . n o it a ti v n i n a g n i s u f e r f o s n o i s s e r p x e

 Student sareablet omakeadialoguebyusingt he . n o it a ti v n i n a g n i s u f e r d n a g n it p e c c a f o s n o i s s e r p x e

Mee itng :2

 Student sareablet ouset heexpressiono faccepitng .

n o it a ti v n i n a g n i s u f e r d n a

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset ot heexpression f

o accepitng ani nvtiaiton.

 Student sareablet ouset heexpressionofr efusing .

n o it a ti v n i n a

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset ot heexpression .

n o it a ti v n i n a g n i s u f e r f o 3 Expressing

s s e n i p p a

H  MStuedeeitnntg sa1re : ablet ouset heexpressiono f .s

s e n i p p a h

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset ot heexpression .s

s e n i p p a h g n i s s e r p x e f o

Mee itng2:

 Student s are able to use the expression o f .s

s e n i p p a h

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset ot heexpression .s

s e n i p p a h g n i s s e r p x e f o 4 Showing

d n a n o it n e tt A

y t a h p m y S

Mee itng1:

 Student sareablet ouset heexpressionofs howing .

n o it n e tt a

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset heexpressiono f .

n o it n e tt a g n i w o h s

 Student sareablet ouset heexpressionofs howing .

y h t a p m y s

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset heexpressiono f .

y h t a p m y s g n i w o h s

Mee itng2:

 Student sareablet ouset heexpressionofs howing .

n o it n e tt a

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset heexpressiono f .

n o it n e tt a g n i w o h s

 Student sareablet ouset heexpressionofs howing .

(66)

9 4

ti n

U Topic Indicators

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset heexpressiono f .

y h t a p m y s g n i w o h s 5 Giving

n o it c u rt s n

I  SMtuedeeitnntg sa1r:eablet ouset heexpressiono fgiving n

o it c u rt s n

i .

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset ot heexpression n

o it c u rt s n i g n i v i g f

o .

Mee itng2:

 Student sareablet ouset heexpressiono fgiving .r

e d r o

 Student sareablet ogiver esponset ot heexpression .r

e d r o g n i v i g f o

6 Announcement  Student sareablet oi dentfiyanannouncemen.t  Student sareablet oanalyzet hepurposeoft he

.t n e m e c n u o n n a

 Student sareablet ogiveanannouncemen.t  Student sareablet ouseverball anguage. 7 Recount  Mee itng1:

 Student sareablet oanalyzer ecountt ex.t

 Student sareablet o ifndt hegene ircs rtuctureoft he .t

x e t

 Student sareablet ousepastt ensei nr ecountt ex.t  Student sareablet omaker ecountt ex.t

Mee itng2:

 Student sareablet odoamonologt ot el lan .

e c n e ir e p x e

8 Narraitve  Mee itng1:

 Student sareablet oi dentfiyt hegene ircs rtuctureo f .t

x e t e v it a r r a n

Student sareablet oi dentfiyt hel anguagef ocu so fa .t

x e t e v it a r r a n

 Student sareablet ousepastt ensei nt henarraitve .t

x e t

 Student sareablet ousepassivevoicei nnarrative .t

x e t

 Student sareablet ousedriect-indriects peechi na .t

x e t e v it a r r a n

 Student sareablet omakeanarraitvet ex.t  Mee itng2:

(67)

ti n

U Topic Indicators

9 Procedure  Mee itng1:

 Student sareablet oanalyzet hegene ircs rtuctureo f .t

x e t e r u d e c o r p a

 Student sareablet ouses implepresentt ensei nt he .t

x e t e r u d e c o r p

 Student sareablet ouset hevocabularyi nt he .t

x e t e r u d e c o r p

 Student sareablet omakeaproceduret ex.t  Mee itng2:

 Student sareablet odoamonolog.

.

4 LearningExperiences

e h t n o d e s a b d e t c e l e s e r e w s e c n e ir e p x e g n i n r a e l e h

T Competency standard ,

c i p o t , e c n e t e p m o C c i s a

B and t hei ndicator so feachunti .Thel earningexpeirence so f e

r e w t i n u h c a

e divided intot hreepa tr ,st hef ris tpatri npre-acitvtiy,t hesecondpa tri s .

y ti v it c a t s o p s i tr a p d ri h t e h t d n a , s e it i v it c a n i a m

.

1 ) eP -r acitvtiy .Pre-acitvtiy consisted of some acitviites tha taimed to atrtac tthe t a h w t u o b a n o it a n a l p x e f e ir b s t n e d u t s e h t e v a g o s l a t I . n r a e l o t t s e r e t n i s t n e d u t s

s l a ir e t a

m theyweregoingt ol earnt ha tday .Theacitvtiyi nt hi spar tpresentedi nf orm tt

a d l u o c t a h t s r e h t o d n a , s n o it s e u q , s e r u t c i p , s o e d i v f

o rac tthe students ’interes tto .s

e it i v it c a t x e n e h t n i e r o m n r a e l

e h t e t a ti li c a f d l u o c t a h t s e it i v it c a e m o s f o d e t s i s n o c t r a p s i h T . s e it i v it c A n i a M ) . 2

d e t a l u m r o f r e ti r w e h t , o s o d o t r e d r o n I . y ti li b a g n i k a e p s r i e h t e c n a h n e o t s t n e d u t s

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI... PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI... 5 5 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI.. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI.. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI... PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI... 1 2 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI... 6 5 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN