!
* +, -!.
/ 01 '2
1/3 &/
23
4 " +0"5 3 :
: 29 / 7 / 92 ! : 24 / 4 / 93
" #
$" % &
$ % &' ( : ) * +, - - $ ./
- 0, ' . $ ./ 1 2. $ * 3 4 5 6 7 89 0
- 0: ; < = ( .
? 9 9@A 7 $ B 0C D.
4 * 3 0 E .
$ ./ F * 3
0 E . G' 1 2. $ 9
$ ./
0C D. @ HI, @ 7
@ :J. K2' 9 0:
I; L M
N - 1390 .
(%
) * . QRD. S $ B9@A 7 : */ 0F
234
* 3 $ T
@ :- 9 0:
. . ) 98 T ( + ) 57 T (
) 62 T (
@ ) 17 T ( L F F I;
. ; @/
9 0. I - :-
DREEM(DundeeReady
Educational Environment Measure) .
7 0. I - :- 0F - 5.
50 - N 0F ZI 0R E
4 ' - ;
3
$
' 8 (
$ ./ ,
@ 4 3 1 $ 8:, ( . .
&+, 9 0: :
* B9@A 7 L .
$ :. 5F
DREEM
* 3 52
/ 108 $ 200 . 7 I[89
@ * 3 G'
0C D.
@ * 3
$ ./ F
$ : \ I: ; 9 1 2.
) 003 / 0
= (.P
C @ :( * 3 7 ^ $ @ ;@
./
' 9 . '@ T .
0F * L M :J. 9 0: 7 0. I - 9 0R E 7 L . 0: 7
@ :- . .
0R ,@ IQ.
) 01 / 0
= (.P
& +
* F _ 0 : L ; 1 2. * 3 0F 0` ;
a R.
@ $ ./ N = 0 : 0, ' . 8 $
I . b 9 $ T:- @ - @ \ * 3 :+ ; +, $ ./ c- I. d 3
DREEM
&' I ' .
IF $ 9 e8F $ ./
.
- %
" . -/6 5 7/& :
DREEM
5 *38
& "/
^ I . $ ./
: . f:C - 9 L
. - * , . I6 @ IF
. I.$ ^ 7
g< . . @ - &' N E h (
.
$ ./ @ f :C9 . % &' 9 c' . $@ .
C Ii:C. . 7 $ f9 )
1 (.
$ % &' (
- ) * +, - - $ ./
. 7 89 0
1 - + $ ./ KKJ' :F .k- D' @
I; L
2 - l I F
. . @ :- :-
. L
3 -
I; L % k_ @ I l I F
Downloaded from zums.ac.ir at 10:54 IRDT on Sunday May 28th 2017
= ( 0, ' . $ ./ 1 2. $ * 3 4 5 6 0: ; <
- ) 2 .(
1 2. 0F D:Q. :CI @ 5 .
0 3' @ 4 IQ. 0 $ ./
$ * 3 @ ' -
- 1 2.
) 3 .(
7 I` f9 . * H @ @
0F IIF
0Q- ' f+. KI e ; 1 2.
C m I.
- .
*/
0Q- ' 5 +C' 0F F F ' 9 _ 0
f D:C.
- $ $ ./ T F g+ 0 f D:C. n @ )
4 .(
I9 * $ ./ 1 2. T F 0. J o
- $ ./
) 6
@ 5 .(
* -
$ ./ +,
[Medical Education for World federation(WFME)]
2.
p 1 9 p
; p +. $ p
f Q. 7 ' p
9
$ p 0.
$ ./ 9 p
3 @ 8 k
&' p
= @ p Ek p
*/ % 9
p p 0 Ip * p
\ e p % @
Q- ' p 0 $ ./
p . p ) 7 .(
, p 2. @ p 1
fF E p ./
p . $ p ' p 9 p @ ; 0=
T:. 9 p _ 0 %@
p F p :- 0 0 p p
@ e
p
*/ $
; @ p . I[89 p Q' . 7 p
3 IIF 7
L p p
; p
:+
p @ p p - K2'
) 8 .(
9 L6
; ;
$ ; 1 2.
@ d fF E
$ ./
.
% C-
@ 9
+I -
$ 9 L6 0F
$ ; 8F 1 2.
@ d
fF E
$ ./
; 7 @ ' L6
B3I- 1 2.
$ ./
L
[Dundee Ready Educational
Environment Measure(DREEM)]
0F - N -
1997
1- ' :F
? - L
I ' - 0
@ 7 @ '
; .
7 L6 0
* I K J '
%k . 0.
- o J &'
$ ./
@ - I
%@ T'
Q< @ 1 2.
gC 0 1 2.
a R.
0 F .
@ 0F . '
% k_
* ; :8 <
:(
* .
$ ./
9 <
) 3 .(
q(
9 8
*/
I' g
$ 8 :
* 8
*
;/
* 8:,
*
@ c- I:.
@ R.
a
* ) 9 ( 0 .
I:- L6 L
$ ./
B9@A
(
$ L6
DREEM
. T:-
@ f+. BD 0 I
Q6 r 1 2. 0F
D . * . 7 Q' ; 9
./ 9 0.
T * 3 \ @ $
. IIF ) 7 ( @
; 1 2. 0F 3 / $ - : IIF 7 Q' 5. $
) 10 ( . - +, @ 5 8' !6
* 3 $
; 9 1 2. $ ` ,@
$ * 3 4 0F
. $ ./ 1 2.
0 '
@ % &' ,
$ ./ 1 2. $ - 0I + 03 : )
13 - 11 ( @ 0F 3 / $
. *@
* 3 F
$ ./ ^ N 2' @ &'
8 ' 3 % = 6 2' @ &' - < ;
4 */ @ 8 F . */ 3 L 8 $ . &' */
3 c , $ ' )
1 (.
$ - @ N 2' 3 % @ \ 0 0, '
$ ./ ^
@ * I 0 3 0F D @
. 0Q. , * , 8 T N 2' 7 '
7 B9@A
? 9 0C D.
* 3 4
$ ./ 9 1 2. $
0 E . 0 E . * 3 $ ./ F
@ G'
0C D.
@ HI, @ 7 0:
M :J. K2' 9
L N - I;
1390 , @ E _
.
(%
) *
9@A 7 p $ B p S T = ' p - QRD.
p . Q8, p
. p Q6 R.
p 0 . p 5 3 p ' * p 9 p 1 2 3
@ 4
)
@ G' p ( 3 @ p ' * p 9 p 7 @ 8 )
@
F p ./
p
$ ( . : $ * 3 7
@ :- 9 0
. . ) 98 T ( + )
57 T ( )
62 T ( @
) 17 T ( . ; 0 8
% = 0 . 8'
8
Downloaded from zums.ac.ir at 10:54 IRDT on Sunday May 28th 2017
3 . :- $ T:- - 7
DREEM
L fF E $ ./ 1 2. - 0 0:( I;
.
p 7 - . I p 0 , @ p k_ BJ @ p
. % p ; e
7- HI, 5.
0:
mRD.
' @ K2' @
50 0 N -
+ % = p
ZI I 0, - I ;
0 ZI
0R E ;
' - 4
3
$ ' 8
( ,
$ ./
@ 4 3
$ 1 8:, (
. 0I :.
p
$ 0. I - l -
ZI I ; p 0 - +
0, I S 83.
-
@
%s 200
. 0I ;
- + 9 0,
I 5.
k. F D . p f ) 4
$ :.
(
fD . ) 3 $ :.
( . R f:C 7G8 )
2 $ :.
( T6 J.
p f ) e
$ :.
( @ 6 J. k. F p
fT ) T=
p
$ :.
( Q' p 7 p . 9 p
R E p ' 0 p Q' 0 0, p - p iF E @ %s p
:.
p 9$
0I ; 9 p . p iF E t :.
p N . l - 0R E 9 $
DREEM
g- 2. % = 7 0 p
0 p : ; ) 12 N -
iF E 48 :.
p
$ ( ' - p ) 11 - p iF E N p
44
:.
p
$ (
3 4
p ' $ p ( 8
) 8 N -
iF E 32
$ :.
(
$ ./ , @ )
12 iF E N - 48
$ :.
.(
$ :.
F 0. I - +`
@ ; a R.
(
M Q\
' T=) 50 ( a R. 08 5 .
) 51 ' 100 (
a R.
gi. 8- 0 : )
101 ' 150 ( C @
a R.
6 ) 151 ' 200 ( I 0Dg_
.
@ p I - p _ $ 0.
p
@ u p :2.
p T:- @ p $
^ p % p KJ:.
p q L p
; I
0:
. . :- 9 @ +
@ $ */
0Q6 R. e 3. * .$/ u _ 9 ( ^ @ %
$ 20
= 3 0
.$
30 $@
) 87 / 0 ( r=
7 Q'
; . .$/
p
* 9 p ./
p . p T:- p 9 * .$/ 5.
T = ' p ) 2 @ 7 L . p
Q. ? p ( .$/ @ p 2' 9 *
) D:C. ' p 5 6 / p
@ p e H _ p 0 ( p . 7
0Q6 R.
05 / 0
P<
0: ; ^ IQ.
. Fv 0 $s
- 2 \ ' p $s % p
_ p 0 9@A w
@ 0. I - \ % = @ 0 1 ,
*/ T ( @ @ ; < * :(
5 8 '
8 .
&+, B9@A 0 9 x- @ 0. I - * 8 5 8 ' * .
0Q6 R. 2' 1- ' 86
./ - 0 = .
iF
E @ p . 9 p p B9@A 158 T ) 5 / 67
= ( y .
. L . p I- 7 p 8 / 2 81± / 20 N - . RD. ^ $ p
m
K2' p 1 / 14 @ @ :F mRD. = 9
/ 85
= p
RD.
p I F m p - p F @ p
& . p K2' 0 N p
5
p . 4 / 24
= p 0Q6 R.
: p 0 9 p
+ p 5
/ 26
= 0:
9 3
/ 7
= @ 0:
9 / 41
= 9 0:
. . @ :- . 5 '
.
197 T p ) 2 / 84
= p ( * 3 mRD.
* !;
l@
G' @ 37 T ) 8 / 15
= (
* 3 mRD.
!;
p F l@ * p
./
p
$ ..
. L p 7 ? 2 @
Q.
8 p F p 9 / 20 52± / 108 83. $ p S 200 :.
p $
. .
N@ , 1 0R E Q. ? 2 @ 7 L . 0. I - 9
DREEM
$ ./ F @ G' @ ; @ 9 . *
.
@ * 3 0F - */ $ F E 9 0:
G' $
: \ ; 9 1 2.
@ 0C D.
$ ./ F @
IQ. %@ T' ^ 7 $ @ ; @ 7
,@
.
Downloaded from zums.ac.ir at 10:54 IRDT on Sunday May 28th 2017
4 +<
1 : 3 6 >0 1 ?/@ / A8-&38 B/C3 /
DREEM
/D& E/ ' ; 5 *38 8-;
F .
P-value
?/@
-/6 5 91
/ 25
) 48 / 6 ( 56
/ 22
) 60 / 5 ( 004
/ 0
?/@
+/ 8 99
/ 21
) 90 / 5 ( 62
/ 20
) 05 / 4 ( 08
/ 0
?/@
5 38 62
/ 18
) 72 / 3 ( 72
/ 19
) 24 / 4 ( 1
/ 0
?/@
<
90 / 26
) 74 / 5 ( 51
/ 24
) 79 / 3 ( 002
/ 0
?/@
!<8 758- 47
/ 15
) 91 / 3 ( 27
/ 14
) 54 / 3 ( 08
/ 0
G <
02 / 110
) 45 / 21 ( 59
/ 100
) 83 / 15 ( 003
/ 0
@ ; @ 7 5D:C. ' * .$/ 0 0, ' G'
@
$ ./ F
*
* :( 8 7 L . 0F )
2 / 22 66± / 108 (
* C 0C D.
) 9 / 17 25± / 108 ( 's @ ; @ 7 .
,@ IQ. %@ T' ./ ^ $ )
8 / 0 p= (
) N@ , 2 ( .
7 L .
5 0R E 0. I - z
DREEM
6 / * .$/ $ T:-
H @
@ g DQ' * .$/
7 LSD
0:
9 M :J.
L 0F * 0:
. . @ :- 0 ; 0
IQ.
0:
%@ T:.
) . 01 / 0
= (P
7 0F
0: - * '@ T' 9
) . N@ , 3 .(
4 +<
2 : / 3 6 >0 1 ?/@ / A8-&38 B/C3
DREEM
H0< E/ ' ; 5 *38 8-;
-!I
-"
P-value
?/@
-/6 5 6
/ 6 62± / 25 9
/ 5 90± / 24 4
/ 0
?/@
+/ 8 6
/ 5 10± / 22 6
/ 5 09± / 21 2
/ 0
?/@
5 38
1 / 4 36± / 19 2
/ 4 93± / 19 3
/ 0
?/@
<
6
/ 5 29± / 26 3
/ 5 02± / 27 3
/ 0
?/@
!<8 758-
4 28± / 15 5
/ 3 28± / 15 9
/ 0
G <
2 / 22 66± / 108 9
/ 17 25± / 108 8
/ 0
Downloaded from zums.ac.ir at 10:54 IRDT on Sunday May 28th 2017
N@ , 4 7 L . f: / Q. ? 2 @
0. I - 9
DREEM
. * 9
. 0R E ;
f: /
16 ) IF . e8F 7. 9 < B 0 $ ./
(
7 L . 7 's 9
/ 0 63± / 2 f: / @ 48 ) f Q. : $ ./
-
- 2.
( 7 L . 7 :8F 01
/ 1 6± / 1 .
0R E
f: / ' - 32
) f9 $ - D $ 1 7 - .
. IIF ( 7 :8F 7 L . 06 / 1 87± / 1 . 0R E
f: / 8 ' 26
) N - 6 Q ; ./ 0: !; 9
@ 7 R.
- F f9 (.
7 L .
7 ' ) 9 / 0 2± ( 9 f: / L 0C D.
. 0R E
$ ./ , 2
f: / 12 ) 0 $ ./ @ Ig .$
- E _ ( (
@ 17 ) @ 5 . e c D'
. a C2. $ ./
( $ :8F 9 7 L . 2
) 0
c ' ' 16 / 1 56± / 1 @ 27 / 1 65± / 1 ( . 0R E 4
8:, ( $ 3
f: / 3 ) ( : 8E f:C -
:- * 3 p
l ,@
p (
14 ) 7.
Ip %
lkF 9 p
$ ./
p CE p L:C( l p
. IF p f ( @ 28 ) 7.
Ip
% CE p +I' l p . IF p f ( L . p 8F 7 p $ :
2 ) c ' ' 0 9
/ 0 29± / 1 14 / 1 61± / 1 @ 01 / 1 99± / 1 (
.
4 +<
3 : 3 6 >0 1 ?/@ / A8-&38 B/C3 /
DREEM
! E/ ' ; 5 *38 8-;
/D&
! - 5 K 8+,;
8-/
P-value >5 !3
L/M LSD<0/05
?/@
-/6 5 21
/ 26
) 92 / 6 ( 44
/ 25
) 20 / 6 ( 66
/ 24
) 91 / 6 ( 64
/ 25
) 14 / 6 ( 7
/ 0
?/@
+/ 8 71
/ 23
) 99 / 5 ( 65
/ 21
) 10 / 5 ( 69
/ 20
) 80 / 5 ( 07
/ 22
) 6 ( 01
/ 0 @ :-
. .
?/@
5 38 37
/ 19
) 53 / 4 ( 95
/ 19
) 65 / 3 ( 33
/ 19
) 75 / 4 ( 22
/ 19
) 12 / 4 ( 7
/ 0
?/@
<
59
/ 27
) 54 / 5 ( 54
/ 26
) 47 / 4 ( 38
/ 25
) 19 / 6 ( 20
/ 27
) 19 / 6 ( 2
/ 0
?/@
758-
!<8 59
/ 15
) 45 / 4 ( 21
/ 15
) 84 / 3 ( 88
/ 14
) 4 ( 67
/ 15
) 41 / 3 ( 7
/ 0
G <
50 / 112
) 69 / 23 ( 81
/ 108
) 43 / 18 ( 96
/ 104
) 52 / 22 ( 83
/ 109
) 06 / 21 ( 3
/ 0
Downloaded from zums.ac.ir at 10:54 IRDT on Sunday May 28th 2017
4 +<
4 : O!5 / A8-&38 B/C3 / 0* - 1
P
DREEM
Q ? 5 *38
/ A8-&38
B/C3 / 0* - 1 O!5 1 ?/@
?/@
-/6 5 06
/
1 2/18 . . u ' H ' % C , F 0 7. 1
12 /
1 2/05 . - 89 ; L c n - % C , 7
07 /
1 1/83 . - 2.- 3 $ ./ 13
9 /
0 2/63 . IF . e8F 7. 9 < B 0 $ ./ 16
1 2/20 . . ; = ( 0, ' $ ./ 20
02 /
1 2/48 . IF . e8F 7. HT 0 8: B 0 $ ./ 22
1 2/10 . . T:- ( 0 $ ./ * .$ $ 24
04 /
1 2/02 . F ' Q< @ ; $ ./ 25
9 /
0 2/02 . F Sk_ $ ./ @ 9 ; 9 ? 9 $ 7. 38
02 /
1 2/33 .f N Q ; e 7. . y $ ./ 44
2 /
1 2/20 . - F ' % . ' F ; $ : % . I ; 47 01
/
1 1/63 . - 2.-f Q. : $ ./ 48
?/@
+/ 8 9
/
0 2/08 . I:C9 9 ;/ l 9 7 - . 2
8 /
0 2/06 . IIF . 8E $ ./ 2. 8 $ 7 - . 6
14 /
1 2/39 . ; . JC8' 0 * 3 7 - . 8
04 /
1 2/16 . I:C9 g:C. 7 - . 9
8 /
0 2/13 . IIF . < * 8 o . _ g' 9 % +. 7 - . 18 01
/
1 2/11 . IIF . 58 a ( 3 0 ($ 0b 7 - . 29
06 /
1 1/87 . II . f9 $ - D $ 1 7 - . 32
9 /
0 2/32 . IIF . T:- $ ./ 7 E {\ @ 9 N i. $ 7 - . 37 01
/
1 2/34 . . gK H ' _ 7 - . 39
02 /
1 2/17 . ( ; ./ H ' 7 - . 40
12 /
1 2/44 IIF . gK 7 - . * 3 50
?/@
5 38 9
/
0 2/58 . 0. * I[89 . F 0 5g< $ 0F ; 9 5 9
/
0 2/94 .f !; . D . N C. - 9 E @ 0F f:C9 7G8R. 7. 10 12
/
1 2/15 . . ./ ( 0 0 E fIF . l CE 7. 21
9 /
0 2 . - F f9 @ 7 R. ; ./ 0: !; 9 N - 6 Q 26
Downloaded from zums.ac.ir at 10:54 IRDT on Sunday May 28th 2017
9 /
0 2/37 zC _ ( 0 $ 0[ / 9 f ' . 7. 27 .
01 /
1 2/61 .f 8 ( 6 89 ) 9 89 * L 0 E 0F 0: ; % F 0 31
1 2/15 . D' 7. ; _ 5 . 5E 9 % +. 41
9 /
0 2/38 . - . : + 9 g< . 1g' . 0: ; 0F g6 R. $ C 45
?/@
<
9
/
0 2/50 . - fF E . / d H ' _ 11
16 /
1 1/56 . - E _ ( 0 $ ./ @ Ig .$ 12
27 /
1 1/65 .. . a C2. $ ./ @ 5 . e c D' 17
8 / 0
2/48 . - fF E . / d IJ- * .$ _ 23
12 /
1 2/06 . ,@ 7. 9 % +. 0Q- ' = 30
04 /
1 2/49 .fIF . :E l CE 9@ ; 0 $ ./ % C , 7. 33 01
/
1 2/15 .fIF . :E l CE x- @ B- /9 I 8- ; _ 34 9
/
0 2/29 fIF . cCF $ ./ % C , IIF . % 3' 7. 35 . 9
/
0 2/27 . f 0: F 8' ( 0 f ' . $ ./ % C , 36 10
/
1 2/31 . . { , ' */ $ l :- 0 $ ./ 1 2. * %!6 42 05
/
1 2/27 . IF . L 3 ; e * I 0 7. $ ./ 1 2. 43 09
/
1 2/22 .f- z f9 ( . 0F 's G- f ' . fI . l CE 49
?/@
!<8 I 8 : 9
/
0 1/29 . ,@ l :- * 3 ( : 8E f:C - 3 1 2/17 .fIF T:- $ ./ 7 $ f ' 8 $ L:C( 5 6 0 7. 4
14 /
1 1/61 .fIF . L:C( l CE $ ./ 9 lkF % I 7. 14 01
/
1 2/89 . ( * :-@ @ 7 7. 15
1 2/87 . - a ( 7. 8:, ; $ 19
01 /
1 1/99 .fIF . +I' l CE % I 7. 28
9 /
0 2/44 . - a R. $ ./ 1 2. 7. ;$- 46
0
; 1 2. BD h K( L @ 0, '
* +, - - $ ./
- N E .
0F `
$ ./ 9 0. D . 7 Q' f+. 5. $ - $ ./ 1 2.
. R. ? 9 0 0, ' 6
0Q 4 $
* 3 ; 9 1 2. $ I;
$ :. 5F 7 L . % $ :. S 83. -
DREEM
* 3 52 / 108 $ 200
* 7 0F
$ 9 .
1 2. $ * 3 gi. +, : ; 9
. TI. ' . 0F - @ \ 0: 7 0 0, ' 0:g6
0 = gi. @ N/ 1 8 7 f9 $ I9 0:
1 2.
' wk= 0 $ L ; @ 9
Downloaded from zums.ac.ir at 10:54 IRDT on Sunday May 28th 2017
$ ./ N g< 5 < 1 * : 0F * 3
I:C9 $ ./ % . ( = * : . ' F f9
|
*k K2:6 ' TF
0 .k- % . (
0Q. , @ ; ' ? 9
) 14 (.
6 :- * 89 @ *@ B9@A 9@A
; 9 1 2. $ * 3 4 $ +,
@ 548
0: 9 3
5. M :J.
. . K' 0 !&' '
c_ . F
I-
9 @ ; :
0F 3
8 7 L .
DREEM
3 / 137 $ 200 ) 15 (.
7 I` f9
0Q6 R.
3 * :C L 0F 8 7 L .
200 / 124 )
16 ( . 9 0F L B9@A
* :C L LI. + $ ./ * :- 8 ,
8 7 L . !(
200 / 139 ) 17 ( 0F $ Z : 7
0Q6 R. 7 L . - 's \ E
. */ 5 s $ '
f:C - 0F 7
* . * / $ ./ 9 2. 3 @
* @ I9
I 6 @ G' $ ./ 1 2.
$ ( @ :+
9 . $ ./ f:C - @ . .
:I- I; L $ ./ f:C - 0F 6 E
. . 0C D. \ E u D2'
@ @ * 3 @ G'
$ ./ F I9 *
@ * 3 0F 7 G'
I: ; 1 2. $ : \ 7 I[89
%@ T'
IQ.
* 3 $ @ ; @ 7 7 } 26 7 $
,@
. 9 _ B9@A * 3 @ 0F
3 .
*/ * . Z : u . 3 : 9
0F I:
@ * 3 0C D. 0
* 3
@ 1 2. $ 7 6
L ; 9
I:C9 ' \ *k ; )
18 .(
0Q6 R.
* 89 @ s @
; ' TI. - 's 9 N - * 3 $ ) 19 ( % 8 I9 z
N - * 3 :8F N@ 9 N - 0C D. 's 9
; )
20 .(
7 0F % Q6 R.
. 0Q6 R. Z :
J89 .
; @ g+ N z 3 0Q6 R.
0 $ ./ 9 1 2. $ - @ @ N - * 3 . * N@ N - * 3 gC 9
) 21 .(
7 0F
0:
. 9 - d'
. [89 I 7 B9@A 9 0:
k. </
03 : 5\ @ M6 J.
. . * 9
* / -
@ * 3 * 3 0C D. I 6
@ 8 ^
F 's
) 13 .(
7
5 6 7 0 s 8:E Z : %@ T' 4 %@ T'
0C D. $ ./ , @ 1 2. $ G' * 3
@ * 3 . $ ./ F
.
\ E u D2' 7 L .
8 * C 0C D. * :(
0F . IQ. 7 7 @ - 's @ ; @
\ ; 9 1 2. $ * C 0C D. * :(
: .
89 [ 0Q6 R. 7 I .
IQ. %@ T'
C @ :( * 3 7 5
5F @ 0R E % $ :.
0. I -
DREEM
/ u D2' 7 @ 9 . )
7 ( @
F $ 5 ' )
22 (
* 89 @ s @ )
19 ( 9 B9@A @
I9 3 )
23 ( 6 :- ) 24 ( b - @ ) 25 ( J89
. - 7 0: * 3 0F 9 . * Z :
0 t . $ ./ 1 2. $ 0R E
@ ' -
( $ 4 4 9 0: L 0C D. 8:,
I: R.
.
*/
( : 8E f:C - 0F D:Q. 9
7 - . @ ,@ l :- * 3 0
IIF 8 58 a ( 3 0 ($
D $ 1 @
8 f9 $ - IIF
. 3 @ 9 0: *
0R E +
F $ a R. $ ./ , .
0: * 3 89 @ *@ u D2' @ H ~ @
A @ 0 1 2. $ -@ * 3 gC 0 0 !&'
Downloaded from zums.ac.ir at 10:54 IRDT on Sunday May 28th 2017
0R E a R. $ ./ , @ ' - ;
F 4 '
K' @ ; * 3 @ @
0: - 0 gC 8:, F . 0R E 9
' -
$ C. :8F F
) 15 .(
0Q6 R.
\ E 42 7 7 L . f: / 2
@ 3
f: / 7 0gI, 9 . 0F I:C9 $ ./ 1 2. $ 9 I '
I g+
p @ 8 :8F 7 L . f: / $
2 0F
* I9
. 5 . .
. 3 8' 7 $ f: /
9 f: / 7 L . 7 's
l CE * 3
0F F
*/
9 :C9 7G8R.
I N C. - 9 E @ 0F
. D .
!;
I ( * :-@ @ 7 @
8:, ; $
*/
9 a ( - . 4 7 :8F 0F 8: /
$ I' g 7 L . :
f: / 3 ( : 8E f:C -
f: / ,@ l :- * 3 12
@ Ig .$
f: / - E _ ( 0 $ ./
14 % I 7.
f: / @ fIF . L:C( l CE $ ./ 9 lkF 48
f Q. 7 I[89 $ ./
- - 2.
. 7 7 L . 9 7
I:C9 L 6 .
* :C L
. t . 7 7 L . f: / 0
9 : g : f:C -
,@ l :- * 3 a ( -
* 8 Q.
0 IIF . 58 a ( * 3 0 ($
- 7.
$ 0F 0[ / 9 <
@ Ig .$ @ fIF •TE
- E _ ( 0 $ ./
) 16 .(
f: / $ . @
0Q6 R. Z : 0 . r . 7 7 L . 9 . \ E .
0Q6 R.
f: / Q- * :C
l :- * 3 ( g : f:C - ,@
7 L . 7 ' 7 )
26 ( . . 7 0F
0Q6 R.
' . .
* 5\ @ bk. </ 0Q6 R.
. 9 f: / 0F 9 10
15 @ 19 7 : 0. I -
f: / @ 7 L . 3
12 47 @ 48 7 L . 7 :8F
. \ E 0Q6 R. Z : 0 . 0F )
13 .(
$ 0 8,
0 8 f3E Q' %@ T' B9@A 7 9 @ 2.
@ * ; IIF F 0: @ 9
M :J. 9 .
7 I` f9
f: / @ 9 ' u 8 7:( ^I. 0 T F 9
%k . 0 0:C, % < t D h (
@ L
- h ( .
* & + _ 0 F
* 3 0F * 0Q6 R. 7 1 2.
B ; L ; ' gi. 8- 0 :
8 $ TI.
. $ ./ ^ 0F 3 / $
@ N 2' @ &' 0 $ 0Q. , 9$ c- I' 0 @ I:C9 I 9 0 * 3 0 I 0 I
. 8+. BD I ' IIF T %s 2' @ &'
7 I
9 $ T:- I .
DREEM
. e8F '
$
. . +I 7 I[89 1 2. $ * 3 4 ;
f^I. _ 0 $ ./ 9 )
N - 9 * (
$ ;
o . @ f6 - d ' ; +,
3 .
* 1 % * "/1
I; L 6 . 8E B9@A 7
3 ; . l z- @ ' 06 D. * ; IC 0 -@ 7
$ ( B9@A $ ./
L @ $ 7 I[89
0 F L 5 K2' 0 5n :2. * 3
, 0F I;
8 9 89 . B9@A 7
. $ IIF .
References
1- Nomeli M, Joibari L, Sanagoo A. Student
participation is key to any change: students' role in the transformation and modernization of
Downloaded from zums.ac.ir at 10:54 IRDT on Sunday May 28th 2017
education system. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2013;10(1): 50-59.
2 -Roff S, McAleer S, Harden R, etal.
Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Med Teacher. 1997; 19(4):295-99.
3- Miles S, Leinster S. Medical students‘
perceptions of their educational environment:
expected versus actual perceptions. Med Educ.
2007; 41:265–72.
4- David, K, Doris Y. Development of a questionnaire for assessing students perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance. Learning Environ Res. 2009;
12(1):15-29 .
5- Plucker JA. The relationship between school climate conditions and students aspirations. J Educ Res. 1998; 91(4):240-46.
6- Pimparyon P, Caleer SM, Pemba S, Roff S.
Educational environment, student approaches to learning and academic achievement in a Thai nursing school. Med Teacher. 2000; 22(4):359-64.
7- Ayed I, Sheik S. Assessment of the educational environment at the College of Medicine of King Saud University, Riyadh. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2008; 14(4): 953-59.
8- Shreemath S, Mayy A ,Roff S. Students’
perceptions of educational environment: A comparison of academic achievers and under- achievers at Kasturba Medical College, India Education for Health. 2004; 17 (3): 280 – 291.
9- SoltaniArabshahi K, Kouhpayezadeh J, Sobuti B. The educational environment of main clinical
wards in educational hospitals affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences: Learners' Viewpoints Based on DREEM Model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2008; 8(1): 43-49.
(Persian)
10- Genn J. AMEE medical education Guide No.
23 (Part 1): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education a unifying perspective. Medical Teacher. 2001;
23(4) :337-344.
11- Abraham RR, Ramnarayan K, Pallath V, Torke S, Madhavan M, Roff S. Perceptions of academic achievers and under achievers regarding learning environment of Melaka Manipal Medical College (Manipal campus), Manipal India, using DREEM the Inventory. South East Asian Journal of Medical Education. 2008; 18-24.
12- Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Stud Higher Educ. 2002; 27(1):27- 52.
13- Aghamolaei T, Fazel I. Medical students’
perceptions of the educational environment at an Iranian Medical Sciences University. BMC Medical Education. 2010;1(1): 10:87.
14- Jabarifar S, Khademi A, Khalifehsoltani F, Yousefi A. Assessment of Isfahan dentistry students about learning - teaching environment.
Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011; 10 (5) :860-867.
15- Brown T, Williams B, Lynch M. the Australian DREEM: evaluating student
Downloaded from zums.ac.ir at 10:54 IRDT on Sunday May 28th 2017
perceptions of academic learning enviernments within eight health science courses. Internatinal Journal of Medical Education. 2011; 2(94):94- 101.
16- Fidelma D, McAleer S, Roff S. Assessment of the undergraduate medical education environment in a large UK medical school. Health Education Journal. 2006, 65(2):149-58.
17- Varma R, Tiyagi E, Gupta JK. Determining the quality of educational climate across multiple undergraduate teaching sites using the DREEM inventory. BMC Med Educ .2005, 5(1):8.
18- Taheri M. Students' perceptions of learning environment in Guilan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Medical Education. 2009;
13(4): 126-133.
19- Kossioni A, Varela R, Ekonomu I, Lyrakos G, Dimoliatis I. Students’ perceptions of the educational environment in a Greek Dental School, as measured by DREEM. European Journal of Dental Education. 2012; 16(1): 73-78.
20- Rishabh R, Sunil K, Abhay K, Veena R, Roy C. Analyzing the dreams coming true for young undergraduates of DMCH, Laherisarai ,Darbhanga using DREEM score. International Journal of Recent Trends in Science And Technology. 2013; 6( 2): 60-63
21- Roff S, McAleer, Ifere OS, Bhattacharge S. A global diagnostic tool for measuring educational environment: comparing Nigeria and Nepal. Med Teach. 2001; 23(4):378-82.
22- Till H. Identifying the perceive weaknesses of new curriculum by means of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) Inventory. Med Teach. 2004; 26(1):39-45.
23- Abraham R, Ramnarayan K, Vinod P, Torke S. Students’ perceptions of learning environment in an Indian medical school. BMC Med Educ
2008; 8:20. Available from:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472- 6920-8-20.
24- Denz-Penhey H, Murdoch JC.A comparison between findings from the DREEM questionnaire and that from qualitative interviews. Med Teach.
2009: 31: 449–453.
25- Edgren G, Haffling A, Jakobsson ULF, McAleer S, Danielsen N. Comparing the educational environment (as measured by DREEM) at two different stages of curriculum reform. Med Teach. 2010: 32: 233–8.
26- Al- Hazimi A, Hyiani A, Roff S. Perceptions of the educational environment of the medical school in King Abdul Aziz University. Saudi Arabia. Medical Teacher. 2004; 26: 570-73.
Downloaded from zums.ac.ir at 10:54 IRDT on Sunday May 28th 2017
Medical Students' Perceptions of Learning Environments in Gonabad University of Medical Sciences
Moshki M1, Dehnoalian A2,3, Shareinia M4
1Faculty of Public Health, University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
2 Dept. of Nursing, School of Nursing, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran
3School of Nursing & Midwifery, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
4Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
Corresponding Author: Dehnoalian A, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
Email: [email protected] Received: 20 Oct 2013 Accepted: 15 Jul 2014
Background and Objective: Recently, many changes have been made in medical education all over the world. For this reason, students’ perception of the educational environment has attracted much attention. The aim of this research is to compare perception of the students who are in training courses with the students who are in theoretical courses and compare two genders and different fields of study in Gonabad University of Medical Sciences in 2011.
Materials and Methods: This research is cross-sectional in which 234 students of nursing and midwifery(98students), health(57 students), paramedicine(62students) and medicine(17 students) of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences participated. Data collection instrument was DREEM (Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure). This standard questionnaire included 50 items in five fields of learning , students’ perceptions of atmosphere, students’ perceptions of teachers, students’ academic self- perception, students’ social self perception. The obtained data were analyzed after inclusion in software SPSS, version 20.
Results: Research findings showed that total mean of DREEM score for students was 108.52 out of 200.
Students of theoretical courses were more satisfied with learning environments than the training students.
This is statistically significant (P=0.003). There was no statistical difference between female and male students. There is a significant relationship between nursing, midwifery and paramedicine(P=0.01).
Conclusion: Generally, although the students evaluated the learning environment in the university as desirable, it is necessary to pay more attention to educational principles and create suitable educational environment for better learning of the students and the use of instruments such as DREEM can contribute to process of change in education.
Keywords: Learning environment, DREEM, Health science students
Downloaded from zums.ac.ir at 10:54 IRDT on Sunday May 28th 2017