• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

AND GENEROSITY TO DISARM YOUR VICTIM

Dalam dokumen The+48+Laws+Of+Power (Halaman 112-118)

12

HI\\«.I-.54Hxnmu Ull IHH-.li (2|l\ll|,\|,\\

['hlI1C‘(’.Y1‘0(ii1m'p])<' Barriof Milan,wi1o.~;e druminM95fill!/mt willziu1/ws’z'vmm’ntI1 ((‘ILlllV_\«’...W115‘ afort’-

rumzernftllul\'[7£'tIl£l/

1_ypvn/Uturlarumual

II(lH’I§{(U(’I'. my(‘our- riwor"mvuiir-r"

im/mxmr....llis real puriml0/ izlurv In-gut:

c1j'Ie.rInrmover!in AnI.m»rrium, l'I'wr€ hr lM.l‘Ul'l1¢'(I (hrmin0/

MedicoUnivcrsale, ntainrtium-'<I41;:v('uI reimw, anddraw’

almn1inumm-I: wiz/z six lmr.\'e.u,..l’:rr;'eieI.v .\‘In'mm’:I(0him.and mnwinvali(l.\‘ /mil I/’2t’I?l.\‘(‘[1’Af.\mrrivriin .\‘t'dllIl c'fmiI'.\‘ 1//I film wit)’

/lmmPurixInhis])/Ht‘!

in Ams/vnlum.Burn rankno/lctyvtnml for his cun.\'uIluI[m1.x: Ho rim:-i/um-d _z:rvmxmm amongrile/mar zmzl was ncwrkrmwrllo rmrvrwany121112142‘)- zlu-oug/:Ill1‘]:(L\'I1/I’

hillsofc.t'cfmI:grr./3:11¢’

c(m(lI'H((,‘([tolive wirlz s‘m'I1.splcIulru'.m'n,'r- ilwlccszr,21 was[H‘l’\‘!:I72(’1’

rim! ht’pa. ml lhs‘

p/u'lu.m/Jlwrr ,\trm(é.

Mir/rlwilyI/ILV‘/suiwjlic»

Imrlimpjwtlrml frmn Am,m'r¢1un1, Then1'!

was(lI\'::ov<,'r'mIthat In’

11.41:! lmicwiwitirlam:

mmwyandrlimnolzrlx (hm /mt! [mewplurcul

in/11’:r'I1m'gv.

-in» w)w1«R<n rm ¢‘HAR1.v\\,\7\.

(Fm-Ln.orFR/\!~«(‘IW0, W3‘)

90

0

LAW12

OBSERVANCE OFTHE LAW

Sometimein

1926,

a

tall, dapperly

dressedman

paid

avisittoAl

Capone,

themostfeared

gangster

of histime.

Speaking

with an

elegant

Continental accent, theman introduced himselfas Count Victor

Lustig.

He

promised

thatif

Capone

gave him

$50,000

he could doubleit.

Capone

had more

than

enough

fundsto coverthe

“investment,”

but hewasn’t inthe habitof

entrusting large

sums to total

strangers.

Helooked the countover: Same-

thing

about the man was different-—-his

classy style,

his manna-r—and so

Capone

decided to

play along.

He counted out{he bills

personally

and

handed them to

Lustig. “Okay, Count,”

said

Capone.

“Doubleitin

sixty days

like you said.”

Lustig

left with the money,

put

it ina

safe—deposit

box

in

Chicago,

then headedtoNew

York,

wherehe had several other money-

making

schemesinprogress.

The

$50,000

remainedinthe bank box untouched.

Lustig

madenoef-

forttodoubleit.Two months later heretumedto

Chicago,

took the money from the

box,

and

paid Capone

anothervisit. Helookedatthe

gangstefs stony~faced bodyguards,

smiled

apologetically,

and

said,

“Please

accept

my

profound regrets,

Mr.

Capone.

I’m sorryto

report

thatthe

plan

failed. . . I

failed.”

Capone slowly

stood up. He

glowered

at

Lustig, debating

which

part

of theriver to throw him in. But the countreached into hiscoat

pocket,

withdrew the

$50,000,

and

placed

itonthe desk.

“Here,

sir,isyour money, to the penny.

Again,

my sincere

apologies.

This is most

embarrassing.

Things

didn’t workouttheway I

thought they

would. I would have loved

tohave doubled your money for you and for

myself»-—Lord

knows I need it--but the

plan just

didn’tmaterialize.”

Capone sagged

backinto his

chair,

confused. “I know

you’re

a con

man,

Count,”

said

Capone.

“I knew itthemomentyou walkedinhere. I

expected

eitheronehundred thousand dollarsor

nothing.

Butthis.. .

get- ting

my money back . . . well.”

“Again

my

apologies,

ML

Capone,”

said

Lustig,

ashe

picked

uphishatand

began

toleave.

“My

God! You’re hon- est!”

yelled Capone.

“If

you’re

onthe

spot,

here’s fiveto

help

you

along.”

He counted out five one—thousand~dollar bills out of the

$50,000.

The

countseemed

stunned,

bowed

deeply,

mumbled his

thanks,

and

left,

tak-

ing

the money.

The

$5,000

waswhat

Lustig

had been after all

along.

Interpretation

Count Victor

Lustig,

a manwho

spoke

several

languages

and

prided

him-

selfonhis refinement and

culture,

was oneof thegreatconarfistsof mod-

ern times. He was known for his

audacity,

his

fearlessness, and,

most

important,

his

knowledge

ofhuman

psychology.

He couldsizeupa manin minutes,

discovering

his

weaknesses,

and he had radarforsuckers.

Lustig

knew thatmostmen build up defenses

against

crooks and other trouble- makers. Theconartists

job

isto

bring

thosedefensesdown.

One sure way todo thisis

through

anactof

apparent sincerity

and

honesty.

Who will distrustaperson

literally caught

intheactof

being

hon-

est?

Lustig

used selective

honesty

manytimes,butwith

Capone

hewenta

step

further. No normal con manwouldhave daredsuchacon;he would have chosen his suckers for their

meekness,

for thatlook about them that says

they

will taketheirmedicine without

complaint.

Con

Capone

and you would

spend

the rest of your life

(whatever

remained of

it)

afraid. But

Lustig

understood thata manlike

Capone spends

his life

rrfistrusting

oth-

ers.Noone around himishonestorgenerous,and

being

somuch inthe

company of wolves is

exhausting,

even

depressing.

A man like

Capone

yearnstobe the

recipient

ofanhonestorgenerous

gesture,

tofeel thatnot everyone hasan

angle

orisout torob him.

Lusiig’s

act ofselective

honesty

disarmed

Capone

becauseit was so

unexpected.

A con artistloves

conflicting

emotions like

these,

since the

person

caught

upinthemisso

easily

distracted and deceived.

Donot

shy

awayfrom

practicing

this lawonthe

Capones

ofthe world.

Withawell-timed

gesture

of

honesty

or

generosity,

youwillhavethemost brutal and

cynical

beastinthe

kingdom eating

outof your hand.

Everything

turnsgray whenI don ’thaveatleastonemarkanthe horizon.

Life

thenseemsemptyand

depressing.

Icannotunderstandhonestmm.

They

leaddesperatelives,

full ofbaredom.

(mm: ‘.1110:Lu.«u,«;, ISO!) :94?

KEYS ’l‘(.) P()\/\"l:lR

Theessenceof

deception

isdistraction.

Distracting

the

people

youwant to deceive

gives

you the timeand space todo

something they

won’: notice.

Anactof

kindness, generosity,

or

honesty

isoften themost

powerful

form

ofdistraction because it disanns other

people’s suspicions.

It tums them

into

children, eagerly lapping

up any kind of a.ft'ectiona.tegesture.

In ancientChina thiswascalled

“giving

before you take”--the

giving

makes ithard fortheother personto noticethe

taldng.

It isadevice with infinite

practical

uses.

Brazenly taking something

fromsomeone is

danger-

ous,even for the

powerful.

Thevictimwill

plot

revenge. Itisalso

danger-

ous

simply

to askfor what you

need,

no matterhow

politely:

Unless the

other personsees some

gain

for

themselves, they

maycometoresentyour neediness. Learn to

give

beforeyoutake. It softens the

ground,

takesthe

biteoutofafuturerequest,or

simply

createsadistraction. And the

giving

can takemany forms:an actual

gift,

atgenerous act,akind

favor,

an“l1on~

est”admission-—whateverittakes.

Selective

honesty

isbest

employed

onyourfirstencounterwithsome one.Weareallcreaturesof

habit,

andourfirst

impressions

lasta

long

time.

Ifsomeonebelieves youarehonestatthestartof your

relationship

ittakes

alottoconvincethem otherwise. This

gives

youroomtomaneuver.

jay Gould,

like Al

Capone,

was a man who distrusted everyone.

By

the time he was

thirty—three

he was

already

a

multimillionaire, mostly through deception

and

strong-arming.

In the late

1860s,

Gouldin- vested

heavily

inthe Erie

Railroad,

then discovered that the market had

L/SW12 91

92, LAW l2

been floodedwith avast amountof

phony

stock certificates for the com»

party. He stoodtoloseafortune andtosufferalot ofembarrassment.

Inthe midst of thiscrisis,a mannamed Lord

john

Gordon- Gordonof- fered to

help. Gordon—Gordon,

a Scottish

lord,

had

apparently

made a

small fortune

investing

inrailroads.

By hiring

some

handwriting experts

'Gordon—Gordon was able to

proveto Gould that the

culprits

forthe

phony

stock certificateswereactu-

ally

several

top

executiveswith theErieRailroad itself. Gouldwas

grateful.

Gordon«Gordon then

proposed

that he and Gould

join

forcesto

buy

upa

controlling

interest in Erie. Gould

agreed.

For a while the venture ap-

peared

to prosper. The twomen were now

good friends,

and everytime Gordon—Gordon came to Gould

asking

for money to

buy

more

stock,

Gould gave it to him. In

1873, however,

Gordon-Gordon

suddenly dumped

allof his

stock, making

afortune but

drastically lowering

the value

of Gould’sown

holdings.

Then he

disappeared

from

sight.

Upon investigation,

Gould foundoutthat Gordon-Gordon’s realname

was

john Crowningsfield,

and that he was the bastardsonofamerchant

Seaman andaLondonbarmaid. There hadbeenmany clues before then that Goi-donvGordonwas a conman,buthis initialactof

honesty

and sup

port

hadso blinded Gould thatittook theloss ofmillions for him to see

through

the scheme.

A

single

actof

honesty

isoftennot

enough.

What is

required

isarepu- tationfor

honesty,

builton a.seriesofacts-—but thesecanbe

quite

inconse-

quential.

Oncethis

reputation

is

established,

aswith first

impressions,

itis

hardtoshake. ~

Inancient

China,

Duke Wu of

Chéng

decideditwastimetotakeover

the

increasingly powerful kingdom

ofHo.

Telling

no one of his

plan,

he

marriedhis

daughter

toHu’s ruler. Hethencalledaoounciland asked his ministers, “I am

considering

a

military campaign.

Which

country

should

weinvade?”Ashe had

expected,

oneof hisministers

replied,

“H11 should beinvaded.” The duke seemedangry, and

said,

“Huisasisterstatenow.

Why

doyou suggest

invading

her?”He had theministerexecuted for his

impolitic

remark. The rulerof Huheard about

this,

and

considering

other

tokensof Wu’s

honesty

and the

marriage

withhis

daughter,

he tooknopre- cautions todefend himself from

Chéng.

A few weeks

later, Chéng

forces

swept through

Hu and tookthecountry,neverto

relinquish

it.

Honesty

is one of the best ways to disarm the wary, butit isnotthe

only

one.

Any

kind of

noble, apparently

selflessactwillserve.

Perhaps

the

best suchact,

though,

isoneof

generosity.

Few

people

canresista

gift,

even

fromthemosthardened enemy, whichis

why

itisoften the

perfect

wayto disarm

people.

A

gift brings

outthe childinus,

instantly lowering

ourdc»

lenses.

Although

we oftenviewother

people’s

actions inthemost

cynical light,

we

rarely

seetheMachiavellian element ofa

gift,

which

quite

often hides ulteriormotives. A

gift

isthe

perfect object

inwhichtohidea

decep—

livemove.

Over three thousand years ago the ancientGreekstraveledacrossthe

seato

recapture

thebeautiful

Helen,

stolenaway from them

by Paris,

and

to

destroy

Paris’s

city, Troy.

The

siege

lastedtenyears, manyheroes

died, yet

neither side hadcomecloseto

victory.

One

day,

the

prophet

Calchas

assembled theGreeks.

“Stop battering

away at these walls!” he told them. “You must find

some other way, some ruse. We cannot take

Troy by

force alone. We mustfindsome

cunning

stratagem.”

The cun—

ning

Greek leader

Odysseus

then came up with the idea of

building

a

giant

wooden

horse, hiding

soldiers inside it,

then

offering

it to the

Trojans

as a

gift.

Neoptolemus,

son of

Achilles,

was

disgusted

with this

idea;

it was

unmanly.

Better for

thousands to die on the battlefield than to

gain victory

so

deceitfully.

But the

soldiers,

faced

with a choice between another ten years of

manliness, honor,

and

death,

ontheonehand

and a

quick victory

on the

other,

chose the

horse,

which was

promptly

built. The trick was successful and

Troy

fell.

One

gift

didmorefor the Greekcausethantenyearsof

fighting.

Selective kindnessshould also be

part

ofyour arsenal of

deception.

For

years theancientRomans had

besieged

the

city

of the

Faliscans, always

un~

successfully.

One

day, however,

when the Roman

general

Camillus was

encamped

outside the

city,

he

suddenly

sawaman

leading

some children

toward him. Themanwas aFaliscan

teacher,

and the

children,

itturned out,werethe sons and

daughters

of thenoblestandwealthiestcitizens of

thetown. On the

pretense

of

taking

these childrenoutfora

walk,

he had led them

straight

tothe

Romans, offering

themas

hostages

in

hopes

ofin-

gratiating

himself with

Camillus,

the

city’s

enemy.

Camillus didnottake thechildren

hostage.

He

stripped

the

teadier,

tied his hands behind his

back,

gave each childa

rod,

and let them

whip

him all the way backtothe

city.

The

gesture

hadanimmediate effect on

the Faliscans. Had Camillus used the childrenas

hostages,

someinthe

city

would have voted to surrender. And even ifthe Faliscans had gone on

fighting,

theirresistancewould have been halfhearted. Camillus’s refusalto

take

advantage

of the situationbroke down the Faliscans’resistance, and

they

surrendered. The

general

had calculated

correctly.

Andinanycasehe

had had

nothing

to lose: He knew that the

hostage ploy

would nothave

ended thewar, atleastnot

right

away.

By turning

thesituation

around,

he

earnedhis

enemy’s

trustand

respecg disarming

them. Selective kindness will oftenbreak down even the most stubborn foe:

Aiming right

for the

heart,

itcorrodes thewillto

fight

back.

Remember:

By playing

on

people’s

emotions,calculatedactsof kind-

ness canturn a

Capone

into a

gullible

child. As with any emotional ap-

proach,

thetacticmustbe

practiced

withcaution:If

people

see

through

it,

their

disappointed feelings

of

gratitude

and warmth willbecome themost violent hatred and distrustUnless youcanmake the

gesture

seemsincere and

heartfelt,

donot

play

with fire.

Im age: The

Trojan

Horse.

Your

guile

is

hidden inside

a

magnificent gift

that proves irresistible to youropponent.

The walls open.

Once

inside,

wreak havoc.

LAW 12 1 93

94 LAW 12

Authority:

When Duke Hsien of Chin was aboutto raid Yii, he

presented

to them a

jade

and a team of horses. When Earl Chih was about to raid

Cl1’ou~yu,

he

presented

to

them

grand

chariots. Hence the

saying:

“When you are about to take. you should

give." (Han-feivtzn,

Chinese

philosopher,

third

century

B.C.}

REVERSAL

When youhavea

history

ofdeceitbehindyou,noamountof

honesty,

gen-

erosity,

orkindnesswillfool

people.

In fact itwill

only

callattention toit-

self. Once

people

have cometoseeyouas

deceitful,

to acthonestallofa

suddenis

simply suspicious.

Inthesecasesit isbetterto

play

the rogue.

Count

Lustig, pulling

the

biggest

can of his career, was aboutto sell theEiffel Towerto an

unsuspecting

indusixialistwho believedthe govern- ment was

auctioning

itoff forscrapmetal. The industrialistwas

prepared

to handover a

huge

sumof moneyto

Lustig,

who had

successfully imper-

sonated a

government

official. Atthe lastminute,

however,

the markwas

suspicious. Something

about

Lustig

botheredhim. Atthe

meeting

inwhich

hewastohandoverthe money,

Lustig

sensedhissudden distrust.

Leaning

overto the

industrialist, Lustig explained,

in a low

whisper,

how low his

salary

was,how difficult his financeswere,onandon.Aftera

few minutes of

this,

the industlialistrealized that

Lustig

was

asking

for a

bribe. For the first time he relaxed. Now he knew he could trust

Lustig:

Since all

government

officials were

dishonest, Lustig

hadto be real. The

manforked overthe money.

By acting dishonest, Lustig

seemed the real

McCoy.

Inthiscaseselective

honesty

would have had the

opposite

effect.

AstheFrench

diplomat Talleyrand

grew

older,

his

reputation

as a mas-

ter liar and deceiver

spread.

At the

Congress

ofVienna

(1814-1815),

he

would

spin

fabulous stories andmake

impossible

remarlmto

people

who

knew he had tobe

lying.

His

dishonesty

hadnopurpose

except

to cloak the momentswhen he

really

was

deceiving

them. One

day,

for

example,

among

friends, Talleyrand

said with

apparent sincerity,

“In businessone

ought

to showone’s hand.” No one who heardhim could believe their

ears: A manwho never once in his life had shown his cards was

telling

other

people

toshow theirs. Tactics like this madeit

impossible

todistin-

guish Talleyi-and’s

real

decepfions

from his fake ones.

By embracing

his

reputation

for

dishonesty,

he

preserved

his

ability

todeceive.

Nothing

intherealmofpowerissetinstone.Overt

deceptiveness

will

sometimescoveryour

tracks,

even

making

you admired for the

honesty

of

your

dishonesty.

13

Dalam dokumen The+48+Laws+Of+Power (Halaman 112-118)